DAVID CAMERON has no right whatsoever to lecture anyone about 'CORRUPTION', for he is one of the most 'corrupt' world leaders that there has ever been. He, specifically, as the British Prime Minister of an unlawful, ‘Coalition administration masquerading as Government’, denied the British people "DEMOCRACY". And, that is the greatest 'corruption' of all.
When I look at DAVID CAMERON, I do not see the man. DAVID CAMERON, I only see, ADOLF HITLER; for he too presided over a, 'Totalitarian Regime'.
ADOLF HITLER warned the whole world what he would do when he achieved the power to govern. He specifically stated that he would use the democratic process in order to gain power, but, the moment he achieved that power, “Heads would Roll”, and, he would create his own Laws.
The very instant Hitler became
‘Chancellor’, he placed before the ‘Reichstag’, (the German parliament), his
“Enabling Act”; providing him with the Supreme power as the, ‘Head of State’;
and, permitting him ‘lawfully’ to create his own law. The ‘elected delegates’
of the Reichstag, knew only too well, that, if they voted ‘YES’ to this,
“Enabling Act”, that, from that very moment, their place and
their participation in the ‘Reichstag’, would became wholly redundant.
The, ‘Reichstag’, would no longer create and pass ‘democratic’ law; Adolf
Hitler, would create, his own laws.
Yet, that, ‘Reichstag’, voted unanimously to pass this “Enabling Act” with the massive majority of 441 votes for ‘YES’, and, only 94 votes for “No”.
The NAZI ‘Totalitarian Third Reich’ had been born, dominated by Fuhrer Hitler.
DAVID CAMERON, had his own
totalitarian, “Enabling Act”; enabling, his ‘political party’
to create and
pass, his own laws. Law, in
the British Parliament today, is not created
and passed by the democratic vote of the ‘elected’ Members of Parliament. The, “Enabling Act”, of the political party ‘WHIPS’; instruct,
Members of Parliament, on how they must vote.
Adolf Hitler, at least had the democratic vote of the ‘Reichstag’, to support his right to create his own law. Therefore, there was nothing at all ‘unlawful’, in what he did.
But, the British political parties “Enabling Act”; by the utilization of the political activities of the WHIPS in parliament is wholly ‘unlawful’. Because, their political activities, ‘instructing Members of Parliament on how they should vote’, has no ‘legality’ at all.
The political party WHIPS in parliament instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members of Parliament, by the Constituents; this creates the, "Prejudice of the People"
"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" IS WHOLLY OUTLAWED AND PROSCRIBED BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' SET OUT IN THE "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689". THE PARAGRAPH, "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED", WITHIN THAT BILL, SPECICALLY INSTRUCTS PARLIAMENT, THAT IN PARLIAMENT APPLYING OR 'ENACTING' ANY OF THE "PREMISES" OF THE BILL; THAT, PARLIAMENT, "OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
Accordingly, DAVID CAMERON'S use of the political party WHIPS in parliament in order to create and pass his own 'LAWS' is wholly, 'CORRUPT'; having, no legality at all.
Here is that paragraph in the Bill of Rights 1689:
The Said Rights Claimed
"And they do Claime Demand and insist upon all and singular the Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter, into Consequence or Example"
Note:
Parliament can never vote to approve the use of the
political party WHIPS in Parliament without causing the, 'prejudice of the
people'. Thus, Parliament can never abolish or amend in any way, the
"Bill of Rights 1689". Because, it provides not only the
"Supremacy" of Parliament; but, more importantly it provides; the, "Protection of the People".
Read my
book “DEMOCRACY” available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
Gordonj
No comments:
Post a Comment