“Beyond all reasonable doubt”
Where I
provided two URL links, providing a demonstration of how this ‘hysteria’ had
created grave injustice in the United States of America in the ‘sexual abuse’
trials that had taken place there between 1988-1997.
One lady, 'Julia',
posted a reply on the social network TWITTER asserting that she would not comply with my request
to read and distribute the posting, because she asserted the content was,
RUBBISH. She asserted, that she was more concerned with the children that were
being sexually abused.
As I point
out in my posting, ‘sympathy’ for the ‘alleged’ victims of sexual abuse, must
not overrule or supplant, the true establishment of ‘guilt’, “beyond all
reasonable doubt”.
Sadly, it is my contention, that in both, what
happened in the American trials, (as demonstrated in these two links I provided),
and, what is happening in our courts today; the mere ‘sympathy’ for the
‘alleged’ victims, is supplanting the requirement; that verifiable
corroborative evidence proving, ‘guilt’, must be established, “beyond all
reasonable doubt”.
In many
cases tried in the courts today, the juries just convict because they are so
terribly sorry for the plight of the ‘alleged’ victims. Without, any corroborative
evidence being presented to the court, at all. The mere 'word of mouth' of the 'alleged' victims, being sufficient to convict.
Irrespective
of the severity of the crime, the very compliance, with the “Rule of Law”,
fully establishes the right of every one, accused, that they should have a fair
trial. If there is any room for ‘doubt’ in any trial, no jury has the right to
convict.
Therefore,
in response to this lady’s assertion that my posting was, “RUBBISH”; and, to
all others that may hold likewise opinion, I merely respond by asking this:
If you were
serving on a jury in a sexual abuse trial where the witness, a very young
child, asserts in giving evidence that, “She was sexually abused in a spaceship
and that 21 babies had been killed by the proprietors and staff of the child day
care centre, and, that the dead babies were fed to the sharks”;
Would you believe that evidence? And,
would you convict?
No? Well the juries in America did
believe that evidence and they did convict.
And, the reason for that ‘conviction’
can only be attributed to the ‘sexual abuse hysteria’ that swept through America
at that time. Prosecutors and vested interested Child Social Services
indoctrinated young children on what evidence they should give. When the child
said they had not been abused, they were not believed; and, they were then
constantly interrogated until they admitted they had been abused. Even Judges
were influenced by the ‘hysteria’ that prevailed. In one ‘Appeal’ against the
long sentence that had been imposed, one accuser witness during the trial,
actually recanted and admitted they had lied. But, the Judge denied the ‘Appeal’,
ruling that the ‘original evidence’ was believable; but the ‘recantation’ was
not.
I am very fearful that this wild ‘hysteria’
is prevailing in my country right now.
JIMMY SAVILE was first accused of
sexually abusing one or two young girls, this quickly was escalated, to many
more being abused; suddenly, due to press and media corrupt influence the number
had risen to ‘fifty’ and then even more. One national newspaper reported only a week
ago, that the number had increased so dramatically, that today there is evidence that JIMMY SAVILE had abused more than ‘One Thousand’
young girls. This has become so absurd that today, any woman who had even just 'shook hands' with JIMMY SAVILE, can now come forward 'alleging' sexual abuse.
It is ludicrous to even suggest that
both Judges and Juries are not influenced by this wild ‘hysteria’. And, that is
why, all those today being charged with ‘sexual abuse’ in our country, can never be assured of a,
FAIR TRIAL.
No comments:
Post a Comment