Tuesday, August 25, 2015

SEXUAL ABUSE ALLEGATIONS...


LORD JANNER ‘SEXUAL ABUSE’ ALLEGATIONS.


 
NOW WE ALL KNOW, WHAT ALL THESE 'SEXUAL ABUSE' ALLEGATIONS, ARE ALL ABOUT,

MONEY MONEY MONEY.

The DAILY MAIL reports, "Janner sued for damages by 6 alleged abuse victims"; and, asserts that the alleged victims have begun legal action to sue him for hundreds of thousands of pounds. The legal experts asserting, that in a combined compensation claim; the claim would exceed £2.5million pounds.

ALLEGED VICTIMS AND THEIR CORRUPT LAWYERS ARE NOT SEEKING "JUSTICE" AT ALL. MONEY, IS THE TRUE MOTIVATION.

Ever since the JIMMY SAVILE sex abuse allegations first hit the headlines alleged 'victims' have been coming out if the woodwork in droves, alleging they were sexually abused. Lawyers have been actively pursuing 'clients' to seize the opportunity to cash in. All asserting, that they only seek "JUSTICE".

It is imperative now for both Government and Parliament; and, the Judiciary; to make it absolutely clear that sexual abuse 'victims' pursuing any claim in the courts will only receive, "JUSTICE", in future; if the offender has been fully found 'Guilty' beyond all reasonable doubt; and, that the, "JUSTICE", so rendered by the court, will only be by, PUNISHMENT FOR THE CRIME; but, that, the courts, will not award or entertain, any claims for, MONEY, at all.

Removing the MONEY from all such claims; will verify, the true motivation of "ONLY SEEKING JUSTICE", where any 'sexual abuse' claim, has been made.

Today, with the wild ‘sexual abuse’ hysteria prevailing in the country, after the JIMMY SAVILE allegations first hit the headlines; it is far too easy to assert and allege, 'historical sexual abuse', has taken place; because, historical sexual abuse, is virtually impossible to prove.

The alleged 'victims' and their 'lawyers' merely relying on getting convictions, without actually having to produce any corroborative ‘EVIDENCE’ at all; solely, relying upon, the ‘sympathy’ for the victim; by a Jury.

IT IS NOW IMPERATIVE THAT THE COURTS MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT HISTORICAL SEXUAL ABUSE MUST BE ACTUALLY PROVED BY 'EVIDENCE' ESTABLISHING GUILT. AND, THAT NO MONEY WILL BE AWARDED AT ALL.

GUILT MUST IN FUTURE BE ESTABLISHED,
A. By forensic evidence, or,
B. By several witnesses that have actually witnessed the abuse.

Highly publicised recent sexual abuse trials in this country have been naught but the travesty of injustice; where there has hardly been any 'concrete evidence' being presented in the courts at all.

Guilt, has merely been established by, assertion, accusation, assumption, and speculation, without any actual ‘evidence’ being presented at all.

Everyone, rightly, must have sympathy for the terrible plight endured by the genuine victims of sexual abuse; but, where MONEY is present as a ‘motivator’ for accusation; the ‘word’ alone, of the accuser, must always be in doubt.

No comments: