Shauna Hoare, and, the injustice of the ‘Becky Watts’ murder trial...
Wednesday 11th
November 2015
NATHAN
MATTHEWS was convicted today of the murder of Becky Watts and of cutting up her
body, in order to hide her body from being found by the police.
His, girlfriend, Shauna Hoare, was also convicted of manslaughter. The prosecution asserting that, both she and NATHAN MATTHEWS had kidnapped Becky Watts, in order to carry out their perverted sexual criminal attacks upon young girls.
Yet, NATHAN MATTHEWS had already told the police that Shauna Hoare had nothing to do with the killing of Becky Watts. In fact, he told the police, that she did not know anything about Becky's death at all.
Shauna Matthews also denied the she knew anything about Becky Watts death; she repeatedly proclaimed her innocence, and, she actually told the police that, when she, actually found out what her boyfriend had done, she felt sick.
Yet, the rotten police and the rotten corrupt prosecution, were so intent on securing her conviction, that they insisted, that they both had kidnapped Becky Watts, for perverted sexual intent; and, as evidence in support of that wicked absurd 'fantasy'; they produced a copy of a text message from Shauna Hoare sent to her boyfriend Nathan Matthews, which contained the sentence as follows:
"Saw a very pretty girl almost knocked her on the head to bring her home lol"
For anyone who is familiar with the jargon of the Internet and Messaging, here is the stark vivid evidence, proving that this was merely a "JOKE"; without any attempt whatsoever; to carry out the intent; as implied by the police and the prosecution, in the trial.
LOL = "Laughs out Loud."
Therefore this text message actually reads: "Saw a very pretty girl at (so and so) today almost knocked her on the head to bring her home 'laughs out loud".
IT WAS THE SHEER WICKED PROSECUTION, AND THE CORRUPT POLICE, AIDED BY THE FILTY CORRUPT AND ROTTEN PRESS AND MEDIA; that so vindictively influenced a jury to convict Shauna Matthews of this crime. They all repeatedly and consistently promoted the concept of "perverted sexual intent". Where, in truth and reality, there was no 'such intent' at all.
I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL REPORTED ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE PRESS AND MEDIA OF THIS COUNTRY, PROVING, THAT, SHAUNA HOARE, WAS ACTUALLY 'INVOLVED' IN THIS CRIME.
She has been unjustly and wickedly convicted. I hope and trust she will appeal.
His, girlfriend, Shauna Hoare, was also convicted of manslaughter. The prosecution asserting that, both she and NATHAN MATTHEWS had kidnapped Becky Watts, in order to carry out their perverted sexual criminal attacks upon young girls.
Yet, NATHAN MATTHEWS had already told the police that Shauna Hoare had nothing to do with the killing of Becky Watts. In fact, he told the police, that she did not know anything about Becky's death at all.
Shauna Matthews also denied the she knew anything about Becky Watts death; she repeatedly proclaimed her innocence, and, she actually told the police that, when she, actually found out what her boyfriend had done, she felt sick.
Yet, the rotten police and the rotten corrupt prosecution, were so intent on securing her conviction, that they insisted, that they both had kidnapped Becky Watts, for perverted sexual intent; and, as evidence in support of that wicked absurd 'fantasy'; they produced a copy of a text message from Shauna Hoare sent to her boyfriend Nathan Matthews, which contained the sentence as follows:
"Saw a very pretty girl almost knocked her on the head to bring her home lol"
For anyone who is familiar with the jargon of the Internet and Messaging, here is the stark vivid evidence, proving that this was merely a "JOKE"; without any attempt whatsoever; to carry out the intent; as implied by the police and the prosecution, in the trial.
LOL = "Laughs out Loud."
Therefore this text message actually reads: "Saw a very pretty girl at (so and so) today almost knocked her on the head to bring her home 'laughs out loud".
IT WAS THE SHEER WICKED PROSECUTION, AND THE CORRUPT POLICE, AIDED BY THE FILTY CORRUPT AND ROTTEN PRESS AND MEDIA; that so vindictively influenced a jury to convict Shauna Matthews of this crime. They all repeatedly and consistently promoted the concept of "perverted sexual intent". Where, in truth and reality, there was no 'such intent' at all.
I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL REPORTED ANYWHERE IN THE ENTIRE PRESS AND MEDIA OF THIS COUNTRY, PROVING, THAT, SHAUNA HOARE, WAS ACTUALLY 'INVOLVED' IN THIS CRIME.
She has been unjustly and wickedly convicted. I hope and trust she will appeal.
Footnotes:
The Jury in British Criminal Trials are always instructed by the trial Judge that they can only convict if on hearing all the evidence presented in the trial that they are satisfied, 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that the accused is, Guilty.
In this trial, and in respect to SHAUNA HOARE, there was an abundance of 'doubt' that required the verdict of, NOT GUILTY.
Adults viewing porn provides no 'intent' to kill; in spite of those allegations reported, by the hysterical and corrupt Media and Press.
The Jury in British Criminal Trials are always instructed by the trial Judge that they can only convict if on hearing all the evidence presented in the trial that they are satisfied, 'beyond all reasonable doubt' that the accused is, Guilty.
In this trial, and in respect to SHAUNA HOARE, there was an abundance of 'doubt' that required the verdict of, NOT GUILTY.
Adults viewing porn provides no 'intent' to kill; in spite of those allegations reported, by the hysterical and corrupt Media and Press.
Here,
is the typical verifiable evidence that the recommendations of the LEVESON
INQUIRY for the statutory control of the Press, should be implemented in full.
The, wild ‘perverted sexual abuse’ allegations hysterically reported by the
Press prior to and during the trial, without any corroborative ‘evidence’ at all; has so specifically influenced
a jury to convict, SHAUNA HOARE, of the crime of ‘manslaughter’.
Yet, it is highly evident, and, in support, there is considerable evidence of doubt proving, that she has been entirely innocent of that crime.
I NEVER COULD TOLERATE INJUSTICE.
Yet, it is highly evident, and, in support, there is considerable evidence of doubt proving, that she has been entirely innocent of that crime.
I NEVER COULD TOLERATE INJUSTICE.
1 comment:
hey I have looked into this too, though only just a little bit . My initial thoughts are that you very well could be correct. I see no evidence whatsoever that Shauna Hoare was involved in or had any knowledge of what Nathan had done
Post a Comment