JERMY
CORBYN entirely fulfilling his leadership election promise to try and
create a new way of doing politics and establishing a more true democracy;
provides a 'FREE VOTE' for all Labour Members of Parliament in
respect of the vote taking place today regarding the 'bombing' of
the 'Islamic State' in Syria.
Yet, DAVID CAMERON, the totalitarian dictator, denies all Conservative Members of parliament a 'FREE VOTE'. He is determined to create his own law in exactly the same way as ADOLF HITLER did, in Nazi Germany. HITLER presented his 'Enabling Act' to the German 'Reichstag', (Parliament), which specifically allowed HITLER to create his own laws. And, this Act was passed by that democratic parliament, by 441 votes for ‘Yes’ and only 94 votes for ‘No’. Therefore and thereby, HITLER, legally, had every right, to create his own laws.
But, CAMERON's "enabling act'; the, "WHIPS, in Parliament"; has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in parliament flout and breach the 'precedent of law' that is established and set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
Therefore, if the TORY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT today, under the influence of the WHIPS, give DAVID CAMERON, a majority vote, resulting in the 'bombing' of Syria;
That vote will be wholly illegal and unlawful and it will be wholly eligible for challenge in law.
In order for the 'bombing' of Syria vote in parliament to be perfectly lawful; all Members of Parliament must be afforded the right of the, FREE VOTE. A 'Whipped' vote in parliament has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. This thereby creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"
Yet the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' or applies any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
Here is the 'evidence' of that paragraph, in that Bill,
Yet, DAVID CAMERON, the totalitarian dictator, denies all Conservative Members of parliament a 'FREE VOTE'. He is determined to create his own law in exactly the same way as ADOLF HITLER did, in Nazi Germany. HITLER presented his 'Enabling Act' to the German 'Reichstag', (Parliament), which specifically allowed HITLER to create his own laws. And, this Act was passed by that democratic parliament, by 441 votes for ‘Yes’ and only 94 votes for ‘No’. Therefore and thereby, HITLER, legally, had every right, to create his own laws.
But, CAMERON's "enabling act'; the, "WHIPS, in Parliament"; has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in parliament flout and breach the 'precedent of law' that is established and set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
Therefore, if the TORY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT today, under the influence of the WHIPS, give DAVID CAMERON, a majority vote, resulting in the 'bombing' of Syria;
That vote will be wholly illegal and unlawful and it will be wholly eligible for challenge in law.
In order for the 'bombing' of Syria vote in parliament to be perfectly lawful; all Members of Parliament must be afforded the right of the, FREE VOTE. A 'Whipped' vote in parliament has no legality at all.
The WHIPS in instructing Members of Parliament on how they must vote; overrules and supplants all 'rightful influence' placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. This thereby creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"
Yet the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' or applies any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
Here is the 'evidence' of that paragraph, in that Bill,
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and
Insist upon all and singular
The Premises as their undoubted
Rights and Liberties and that
noe Declarations Judgements
Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any
of the said Premises, ought in
any wise to be drawne
hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
Gordonj
Gordonj
No comments:
Post a Comment