THERESA MAY's arrogant smile....

That arrogant smile….

Taking that arrogant smile off THERESA MAY’S face.

 Very simple, just pose these three questions to her, that will verify what a liar and a ‘breaker’ of the ‘LAW’, that she is.

 

Question 1. Do you firmly believe in, DEMOCRACY ?

Question 2. Then why do you not rely on DEMOCRACY to create and pass Government legislation, in parliament?

Question 3. Why do you insist on relying upon the UNLAWFUL political party WHIP, to create and pass that legislation?

 

Note: If each one of the 16,141,241 people who voted “REMAIN” in the E.U. Referendum were each to pose these questions to her; that smile would disappear from her face in an instant; because, it is impossible to be a, “DEMOCRAT”, believing in, “DEMOCRACY”; if the procedures in parliament are not, “DEMOCRATIC”. Members of Parliament being forced by, THERESA MAY, to, comply with, and, submitting, to the political party ‘diktat’ of the WHIPS; has no legality at all.

 

16,141,241 people jamming the Internet and Facebook and Twitter with these questions; and, jamming her mailbox mayt.mp@parliament.uk as well; would soon wipe the smirk off her face.

_{TODAY, BOTH GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT CREATES AND PASSES 'ACTS' 'BILLS' AND 'MOTIONS' IN PRECISELY THE SAME MANNER AS 'ADOLF HITLER' AND THE NAZIS CREATED THEIR OWN LAW. HITLER HAD HIS LAWFUL "ENABLING ACT", FOR DOING THIS. BUT, THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.}

 

_{THE "POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS" IN PARLIAMENT INSTRUCTING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE;}

_{OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS; ALL RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE PLACED UPON THOSE MEMBERS BY THE CONSTITUENTS.}

_{THIS, CREATES THE "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE";}

_{AND, THIS IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' AS SET OUT IN THE, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"}

_{“The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

 

_{Gordon J Sheppard}