ELITE -v- COMMON HUMANKIND

The, ‘Elite’ -v- The, ‘Common’ People.

 

^{"PRINCE WILLIAM DEMANDS £1.3 MILLION FROM A FRENCH MAGAZINE OVER TOPLESS KATE PHOTOS"}

^{PRINCESS KATE BARED HER BREASTS IN PUBLIC, SHE WAS PHOTGRAPHED, THE PICTURE WAS PUBLISHED; PRINCE WILLIAM NOW PURSUES THE CLAIM FOR 'DAMAGES' COMPENSATION, IN THE COURTS.}

^{Prince William, one of the most, 'elite'; has all the power and majesty of the Monarchy, to influence both court and jury in respect of his claim. Plus, he has all the power of 'DESPOTISM', that consistently upholds and promotes the Monarchy as well. He also has all the money he needs to support his claim in the courts. Furthermore, with all this ‘influence’ at his disposal, he can easily persuade the corrupt 'profession of law' to take his case; and, represent him in the courts.}

 

^{Compare this, then; with the plight of all, 'Common Humankind' living today in the U.K. They also, have the 'equal right' to pursue injustice, and seek damages compensation in the courts. But, their access to the courts, is wholly denied.}

^{Consider this;}

 

^{What has the greater superiority of the claim to, injustice? Princess Kate displaying her breasts and, being photographed and that picture being published? Or, all the U.K. 'Common Humankind', being denied access to a, TRUE DEMOCRACY? Who, here, has the greater lawful valid claim?}

 ^{The, ordinary, common people of Great Britain are denied access to a true DEMOCRACY, because,}

_{THE "POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS" IN PARLIAMENT INSTRUCTING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE;}

_{OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS; ALL RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE PLACED UPON THOSE MEMBERS BY THE CONSTITUENTS.}

_{THIS, CREATES THE "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE";}

_{AND, THIS IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE 'PRECEDENT OF LAW' AS SET OUT IN THE, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"}

 

_{“The Said Rights Claimed”:}

_{“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”}

 

But, in Great Britain today, this wicked injustice, cannot be challenged in law.

 

WHY?

 

^{Because, the rotten and corrupt Judiciary "Conspire to Pervert the Course of Justice" and, deceive the British people, that the "Supremacy of Parliament" is, ABSOLUTE; and, therefore ruling, that Parliament may not be 'Questioned' in the Courts, under any circumstances.}

^{But, Parliaments "SUPREMACY" depends entirely on Parliament complying with the conditions, as set out, in the 'precedent of law' of the, "Said Rights Claimed" (as can be seen above). This specifically determines that anyone can 'question' Parliament in the Courts; if and whenever, Parliament, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"}

^{So, the 'LAW' is clear and emphatic on this point; but the 'common people' cannot present this 'injustice' in any court; because, the 'profession of law' is so cowardly, that it will not represent the 'common people', in such a case.}

CONCLUSION

The political party WHIPS in parliament has no legality at all.

The 'common people' cannot get access to 'law' because, they have none of the power and influence of a Prince, as is described above. With, no access to 'LAW' whatsoever;

Britain, is not a "DEMOCRACY";
It’s a rotten, filthy, TOTALITARIAN REGIME".

 

Where, ‘Acts’, ‘Motions’, and ‘Bills’ are being created and passed in Parliament today, in precisely the same way; as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS, created their own, LAWS.