The British,
TOTALITARIAN REGIME.
Here is the
evidence fully establishing that Great Britain is not a, DEMOCRACY.
DOMINIC RAAB MP
is presently negotiating with the E.U. Commissioner, MICHEL BARNIER, the terms of leaving
the E.U. Yet, where does he get the ‘true legality’ for carrying out that
negotiation?
Both he and
the Government assumes that the authority derives from the fact that Parliament
had passed the, “Article 50 Bill” and, the, “European Withdrawal Bill.”
But, in truth
and reality, and, by precedent of, “LAW”, the passing of those Bills by
Parliament ‘under’ the complete domination and control; and, the INSTRUCTION;
of the political party ‘WHIPS’; is wholly corrupt. They have no true
legality at all. Both of those Bills, through all the passages of those Bills, in
Parliament, were passed; by a, “Whipped Vote”.
Thereby, they
are corrupt Bills, having no ‘legality’ at all.
When the
political party WHIPS, in parliament, instruct elected Members of Parliament on
how they must or should vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful’
influence placed upon those Members, by the Constituents.
THIS,
THEREFORE, CAUSES, THE, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”
But, the, “PREJUDICE
OF THE PEOPLE”, is specifically proscribed by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of
Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed.”
This
paragraph of that Bill; (the, very same Bill, whereby Parliament claims its
SUPREMACY); specifically instructs parliament; that, parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’
any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, only providing that parliament, “OUGHT
NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
Note: The, “PREMISES”
is everything written in the Bill; and, when, “The Said Rights Claimed”, determines,
that,
"noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of
the People, “in any of the Premises”, ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter, into Consequence or Example",
“The Said Rights Claimed" is
declaring that it is the, “SUPREME AUTHORITY, of the, whole Bill.
The Said Rights
Claimed
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The
Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations
Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the
said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or
Example”
The,
political party WHIPS in parliament do, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE’; so thereby, the
WHIPS in parliament; has no ‘legality’ at all.
The, “E.U. ‘Article
50’ Bill” and, the, “E.U. ‘Withdrawal Bill” were both passed in parliament; in
all of the ‘stages’; by a, “WHIPPED VOTE”; thereby, verifying in “LAW’; that
both Bills are now, CORRUPT.
If Government,
still wishes to pursue them, to get them both true “legality”; then Government
will have to present them to PARLIAMENT again. But, by this time, all Members
of Parliament having, a, FREE VOTE.
If, in the
E.U Referendum, you are among the, 16 MILLION, who voted, “REMAIN”?
Here is your
opportunity, for your voice to be heard again. All you must do; and, it won’t
cost you a penny; is to scream, ‘from-the-rooftops’,
“THE
POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS ARE UNLAWFUL”
“ABOLISH THE
WHIPS”
16 MILLION VOICES
SCREAMING OUT THIS, WILL ALERT MEDIA TO TAKE NOTE AND THEREBY INVESTIGATE
PROPERLY THE MATTER; AND, PLACE PRESSURE UPON THE JUDICIARY, TO REVISE THEIR
RULING, THAT, “ARTICLE 9”; (PROVIDING THE “SUPREMACY” OF PARLIAMENT); IS “ABSOLUTE”
IN LAW; AND THEREBY, DECLARING; THAT, “THIS PREVENTS ALL QUESTIONING OF
PARLIAMENT IN THE COURTS, IRRESPECTIVE, OF ANY CIRCUMSTANCES”.
THAT, RULING,
BY THE JUDICIARY, IS WHOLLY CORRUPT. BECAUSE, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”; WHEN, PARLIAMENT
”PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”; OVERRULES; “ARTICLE
9”.
Whereby, Parliament, loses its, "SUPREMACY".
No comments:
Post a Comment