European
Convention on Human Rights
Saturday,
15 September 2018
20:21
When anyone British
has their “Human Rights” violated, abused or denied; the BRITISH GOVERNMENT is
required by the “LAW” of “Article 1” and “Article 13” of this Convention; (Which
it has signed); to provide access to the British Courts, in order for them to
secure, the possible remedy.
My “Human Rights” are
violated; various British ‘authorities’ are DISCRIMINATING against me denying
my access to a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.
I want to challenge
that INJUSTICE in a Court of Law. The BRITISH GOVERNMENT is obliged by this
CONVENTION to provide that access.
The ‘authorities’
violating my “HUMAN RIGHTS” and denying my access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY are,
1.
The
“Reigning Monarch” HM QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND who has not honoured the
“Original Contract” all of the time she has occupied the throne. This ‘unwritten’
contract, “Betwixt King and People”,
requires all “Reigning Monarchs” to act as
“HEAD OF GOVERNMENT”; to, monitor Parliament; and to protect the “CROWNS
SUBJECTS” from the ‘abuse’ and ‘prejudice’ of Parliament. Granting the “Royal
Assent” if the laws passed by Parliament are free of corruption; refusing the
“Assent” if the laws so passed by Parliament are not in the interests of the
country and the People, or if they are corrupt. HM QUEEN has frequently
granted, or has allowed the granting of “Royal Assent, by the despots now
acting in her name, to corrupt “Acts” “Motions” and “Bills” that have been
passed in Parliament ‘under the diktat and influence’ of the political party
WHIPS; and the WHIPS in Parliament has no ‘legality’ at all. Thereby, HM QUEEN
violates my “Human Rights”, EVERY TIME SHE HAS GRANTED THE “ROYAL ASSENT” TO
CORRUPT LAW.
2.
Government
and Parliament also violate my “Human Rights” and deny my access to a TRUE
DEMOCRACY, by creating and passing Acts, Motions, and Bills in Parliament
today; in precisely the same manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their
own laws. With, all the horrific consequences that followed.
3.
The
political party WHIPS in Parliament also violate my “Human Rights” and deny my
access to a TRUE DEMOCRACY because when they instruct ‘Members of Parliament’
on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all my OWN
‘rightful influence’ I may place upon my Member of Parliament; thereby causing,
“THE PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” - Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is specifically
proscribed by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights
Claimed. This paragraph of that Bill specifically instructs Parliament that it
may have its “SUPREMACY” afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” or Parliament
may ‘enact’ any of the other ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; but only upon the conditions
as set out in, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” which specifically instructs
Parliament that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
4.
The
entire BRITISH JUDICIARY also violates my “Human Rights” and denies my access
to a TRUE DEMOCRACY; by consistently “Conspiring to Pervert the Course of
Justice” and, deceiving the British People, that Parliament may not be
‘questioned’ in the Courts. By, ruling that “Article 9” is, ABSOLUTE in law,
thereby ‘preventing’ the questioning of Parliament in the Courts, irrespective
of any circumstance. This ruling is wholly untrue and corrupt, because the
correct reading of the “Bill of Rights 1689” reveals that anyone has the right
to ‘question’ Parliament in the Courts, if and whenever, Parliament “PREJUDICE
THE PEOPLE”
REMEDY SOUGHT:
IN CONSIDERATION AS TO WHETHER MY HUMAN
RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, AND I HAVE BEEN DENIED MY RIGHTFUL ACCESS TO
DEMOCRACY, THE COURT MUST DECIDE ON ALL THE FOLLOWING CRITERION.
A. Whether the E.U. REFERENDUM ballot paper
provided enough information, to properly consider how to vote. The ballot paper
provided only two options; two boxes to tick, "Leave" and
"Remain"; I contend that this was insufficient information because it
provided no information as to what would happen if the declared result of the
referendum determined, "LEAVE". There was no mention whatsoever
provided in respect to the fact that in the UK joining the E.U. that this was a
'Treaty" and, thereby the 'withdrawal from the E.U.; required
'negotiations' with the E.U.; before the actual 'leaving' could take place. The
ballot paper provided none of this, nor did it even mention the words: "Article 50". I therefore
contend that this 'ballot paper' breached my "HUMAN RIGHTS".
B. The Court must also decide whether a
"WHIPPED VOTE" in Parliament is lawful or not. I contend that the
political party WHIPS in parliament instructing Members of Parliament on how
they must vote; has no legality at all. They flout and breech the, 'precedent
of law' set out in, "The Said Rights Claimed".
C. Therefore, the Court must determine whether
the "Whipped Vote" taken in Parliament passing the "Article
50" Bill; and the, "E.U. Withdrawal Bill"; is lawful
or not. I contend that they are both unlawful and corrupt; and, that they both
deny, my rightful access to, DEMOCRACY.
D.FINALLY, THE COURT MUST DECIDE ON THE LEVEL
OF THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION TO BE AWARDED, IF THE COURT ACCEPTS, THAT BY THE
"EVIDENCE" PROVIDED HERE; MY HUMAN RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.
E. I THEREFORE SUBMIT THE CLAIM FOR
COMPENSATION AS FOLLOWS:
F.
I
want and SUBMIT THE CLAIM for the huge financial compensation of, "ONE
MILLION POUNDS PER YEAR; FOR EACH YEAR OF MY LIFE; MY ACCESS TO DEMOCRACY HAS
BEEN DENIED.
G. This
huge compensation claim is based solely on the value that the
British and American governments ACTUALLY place on, DEMOCRACY. Both of
these governments have spent, "Billions of Pounds" waging war and
killing thousands in order to install their 'idea' of DEMOCRACY in other lands:
Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc etc, wherever, the British or American soldiers’
boots have trampled on other lands.
H.THEREFORE, MY CLAIM
OF "ONE MILLION POUNDS PER YEAR" FOR EACH YEAR OF MY LIFE; WHEREBY
"DEMOCRACY" HAS BEEN DENIED TO ME; AND, MY "HUMAN RIGHTS' HAVE
BEEN VIOLATED; IS MERELY 'TINY' IN COMPARISON.
APPENDIX
Open in new tab:
"European Human Rights Convention:
"The Said Rights Claimed"
No comments:
Post a Comment