Thursday, October 18, 2018

BREXIT - NO ONE HAS EVEN MENTIONED 'LAW'.....


LAW - and the – “Rule of Law”

 

THE SHEER CHAOS, CONFUSION, COMPLICITY, and CORRUPTION taking place now in parliament and, in the country; in respect to everything about BREXIT; and, the legislation;

Where, the Prime Minister and, the 'right wing' element of the Tory Members of Parliament, consistently, are relying upon the fact that the People voted to 'LEAVE' the E.U.; therefore, this is the 'sacrosanct' reason, asserted by their claim, that "BREXIT MEANS BREXIT"; and, that parliament must now recognize and accept that this was the democratic  'vote' of the People, that now must be obeyed.

 

Repeatedly, we hear Members of Parliament proclaiming, "The People have voted to LEAVE we must honour that referendum vote, and ensure we LEAVE"

 

THERE IS ONLY ONE COURSE OF ACTION NOW AVAILABLE TO ALL THAT VOTED "REMAIN"

 

TO CHALLENGE, FROM WITHIN LAW, THE ACTUAL LEGALITY OF THE "BALLOT PAPER" PROVIDED FOR THAT REFERENDUM VOTE.

 

WHAT SICKENS ME ABOUT MY COUNTRY TODAY IS THAT 'LAW' AND THE "RULE OF LAW" IS NEVER EVER EVEN MENTIONED. IN ALL THE "BREXIT" LEGISLATION DEBATES THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN PARLIAMENT; NOT ONE MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT, HAS EVEN MENTIONED THE WORD. "LAW".

 

This is most important, because the British People have no "protection of law" whatsoever.

1.        There is no Written Constitution;

2.        There is no proper "Bill of Rights";

3.        There is no "Supreme Court of Law"; where it is possible to 'question' the 'abuse' of parliament from within, LAW.

4.        Furthermore, the "Reigning Monarch" sitting upon the English throne, charged with the duty of honouring and complying with the "Original Contract" requiring the protection of all "Subjects of the Crown”; has failed miserably to carry out that 'duty'; throughout all the years she has occupied that throne.

5.        Far worse, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has repeatedly granted;  the “ROYAL ASSENT”, to corrupt LAW.

6.        Or, if she has not actually granted that “Assent” by herself; but, has allowed it to be granted, 'in her name', by the despots now dominating and controlling the Monarchy. Irrespective, of whoever granted that, “ROYAL ASSENT”. It, was granted to, "CORRUPT LAW".

7.        All Acts, Motions, and Bills, created and passed by parliament UNDER THE 'DIKTAT' AND INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS, has no 'legality' whatsoever; all such legislation is both UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.

8.        The, political party WHIPS, instructing Members of Parliament on how the should or must vote; overrules and supplants the Constituents right to 'influence' their Member of Parliament. Therefore, this causes the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".

9.        Yet, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is specifically proscribed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".

This paragraph of the "Bill of Rights 1689" specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may have its "SUPREMACY" afforded to Parliament by "Article 9"; or, Parliament may 'enact' any of the "PREMISES" of the Bill; but, only by complying with the requirements of, "The Said Rights Claimed". Which states, and requires, that nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 ALL THE BREXIT LEGISLATION THAT HAS BEEN PASSED IN PARLIAMENT 'UNDER INSTRUCTION BY THE WHIPS' IS WHOLLY UNLAWFUL & CORRUPT. BOTH THE "TRIGGERING OF THE ARTICLE 50 BILL; AND THE "E.U. WITHDRAWAL BILL" PASSED BY PARLIAMENT; IS THEREFORE CORRUPT.

A. MONARCHY DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW'

B. PARLIAMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW'

C. THE JUDICIARY DO NOT ‘PROTECT THE PEOPLE’ AT ALL;

 In fact, truth, and reality, the rotten JUDICIARY consistently, "Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice", and deceive the BRITISH PEOPLE; by ruling that, "Parliament may not be 'questioned' in the Courts", UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. -

Whereas, the "Bill of Rights 1689" in the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", wholly verifies that anyone may 'question' or 'challenge' the 'abuses' of Parliament in the Courts; if, and whenever, Parliament,

"PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"

 

Because, "The People" have no 'protection of law' whatsoever;

The 'legality' of the E.U. REFERENDUM "BALLOT PAPER"; must be tested in, "LAW".

I contend;

1.        The 'ballot paper' contained insufficient INFORMATION for the people to properly understand the implications of what they were 'actually' voting for.

2.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all in respect to the fact that Britain, in joining the E, U., agreed and signed a "TREATY". And therefore, in order to "LEAVE" the E.U.; Britain would be required to 'negotiate' with the E.U.; in order to, LEAVE.

3.        The ballot paper made no mention of this at all.

4.        The ballot paper made no mention of the triggering of "Article 50".

5.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about a, "Customs Union" or a "Single Market".

6.        The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about what would happen if the People voted to. "LEAVE".

7.        The People, therefore blindly boarded a 'bus' without any 'destination' being revealed; and, not having a clue, where the 'bus' was going.

8.        NO ONE GETS ON  BUS - NOT KNOWING - WHERE THE BUS IS GOING.

9.        But, that is what the People did, when they voted, in respect to that ballot paper.

10.                  The ballot paper provided no INFORMATION at all about the role of Parliament.

 

I contend, that, further; the People, were unlawfully motivated to vote "LEAVE" by,

 

1.        The massive ANTI-IMMIGRANT campaign mounted and waged by virtually all British News Media, in the weeks leading up to the actual vote.

2.        Right Wing" Members of Parliament persistently promoting this 'anti-immigrant' stance, in order to 'influence' the voter to vote, "LEAVE".

3.        Plus; The calculated 'lie' told and promoted by the "LEAVE" camp, that, "£350,000 per Week" would be saved to be available for the "National Health Service", if the People, voted to LEAVE.

4.        Plus; The constant 'lie' told and promoted by the "LEAVE" camp; that, "Britain would be far better off and be able to trade successfully with any country in the World, if the People voted to "LEAVE" - Yet, without presenting any 'evidence' at all, to the voter; that this could be, TRUE.

5.        NOT ONE SIGNED CONTRACT, FOR, ANY TRADE DEAL, was provided to the 'voter', in order to verify that claim.

 

I contend,

That no honest person; or honest "COURT OF LAW"; can assert, verify, or rule that the "Referendum Ballot Paper" provided to the voter; was, LAWFUL.

That, 'ballot paper', was wholly UNLAWFUL and CORRUPT.

THE TRUE LEGALITY MUST BE TESTED IN LAW.

 

 

No comments: