BREXIT –
ABSOLUTE DISASTER
Radical Remedy now required;
Therefore, LAW must now prevail.
I therefore challenge all the ‘elite’
establishment of our land, MONARCHY. JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT AND PARLIAMENT to
provide the absolute proof of the LEGALITY
for the use of the ‘Political Party Whips’ in PARLIAMENT.
IT IS MY CONTENTION that the ‘Political
Party Whips’ in PARLIAMENT has no LEGALITY
at all.
In instructing ‘elected’ Members of
Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the
Constituents; who ‘elected’ those
Members of Parliament in the first place.
Therefore, when the Political Party
Whips do this; they cause and create, “THE PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.
But, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” by
Parliament, is wholly proscribed by
the ‘precedent of law’ determined by
the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.
This paragraph, of that Bill; “The Said Rights Claimed”; specifically
instructs Parliament, (and all reading), the “Bill of Rights 1689” that Parliament, may have the provision of
the “SUPREMACY”
of Parliament; afforded to Parliament by “Article
9” of that Bill; or, Parliament may ‘enact’,
any of the other “PREMISES” of the
Bill. But, only upon the conditions that in anything that Parliament does in ‘enacting’ any of those “PREMISES” of the Bill; nothing, “OUGHT
PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
Therefore, as determined by the ‘LAW’ of the ‘protection of the people’; set out in this “Bill of Rights 1689”; “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” prohibits
Parliament, from the abuse of Parliament causing the, ”PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.
The, “Said Rights Claimed” is the over-all ‘superior authority’ over ‘everything written’ within the “Bill of
Rights 1689” – This is established by the fact and verification - that within
the text of this paragraph of the Bill; it specially states that it is the ‘superior
authority’ over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.
IT IS THEREFORE MY CONTENTION that,
1.
The Political Party Whips in
Parliament, “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE” and thereby, the Whips in Parliament; has no
LEGALITY at all.
2.
Thus, with the Political Party Whips
in Parliament having no LEGALITY whatsoever; all or any ‘Acts’ ‘Motions’ or ‘Bills’
created and passed in Parliament – under the ‘instruction’ or ‘diktat’ – of the
Whips; also, has no LEGALITY at all.
3.
This being the established fact in LAW; the, “Statute, E.U. (Withdrawal) “Triggering
Article 50” Bill”; is wholly unlawful. Having no LEGALITY at all.
4.
Parliament,
“Triggering Article 50” Bill, is
therefore both, ILLEGAL and CORRUPT.
5.
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN therefore, in respect to this Bill; She granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to corrupt law’.
6.
IF THE ‘ELITE’
ESTABLISHMENT OF MONARCHY; JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT, OR PARLIAMENT, WERE TO REFUTE
THIS CLAIM OR ALLEGATION; THE MERE EXAMINATION BY THE “SUPREME COURT” IS
AVAILABLE TO VERIFY OR REFUTE ALL THE ‘ALLEGATIONS’ SET OUT ABOVE.
7.
I, challenge them to do so.
NOTE – Parliament, and all this ‘elite’ establishment can never claim that in
some previous history of Parliament; Parliament approved the use of the, ‘Political
Party Whips’, in Parliament.
Because, the mere ‘proposition’
placed before Parliament; for the assenting vote of Parliament for such Bill; could never ever
even been ‘put to Parliament’ without flouting and breaching the “Said Rights Claimed”.
This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically ‘protects’
the People from the “PREJUDICE” of
Parliament.
Placing that ‘proposition’ before Parliament; takes that ‘protection of the people’ away. Therefore,
such ‘proposition’ would flout and breach that, LAW.
“The Said Rights
Claimed”:
“And they do Claime
Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights
and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to
the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to
be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
BREXIT – Resorting to LAW here establishes that the ‘Triggering of Article 50’ by Parliament was both UNLAWFUL and
CORRUPT.
This verifies
that in respect to BREXIT now; “Article
50” is not ‘extended’ or ‘revoked’; It is totally abolished.
Therefore,
all the E.U ‘Withdrawal’ legislation of the last two years; has no ‘LEGALITY’ whatsoever.
If the
BRITISH people and Government still want to leave the E.U.? – There will have
to be a new Referendum for the people to decide.
If that new
Referendum result still decides the option to, ‘LEAVE’; then “Article 50”
will have to be ‘triggered’ again.
Meanwhile,
BRITAIN REMAINS IN THE E.U.
No comments:
Post a Comment