BREXIT IS UNLAWFUL

BREXIT – Just one chance left to stop the insanity.

Just one chance left before leaving the E.U. without a deal.

Just one chance left to challenge the LEGALITY of BREXIT; and secure an injunction in the Courts, to stop all procedures of BREXIT until the Court has heard the case.

 

BREXIT IS TOTALLY UNLAWFUL.

Three ‘prima facie’ reasons verify why BREXIT is unlawful,

1. The Referendum ballot paper was fraudulent and corrupt.
2. The ‘lies’ BORIS JOHNSON told perverted and corrupted the final vote of the Referendum.
3. “Article 50” of the E.U. (Withdrawal) Bill was passed in parliament by a “Whipped Vote”; which has no LEGALITY at all.

 

The ‘corrupt’ Ballot Paper


It only provided two boxes to tick to,  ‘LEAVE’ or ‘REMAIN’


It provided no information at all as to what was to happen if the voter's voted to ‘LEAVE’.

It provided no ‘MANDATE’ to anyone or anything to take charge of procedures if the declared vote was to, ‘LEAVE’ the E.U.

Parliament granted the democratic Referendum; therefore Parliament ought to have taken charge when the final declared vote was to ‘LEAVE’. But, THERESA MAY seized that control for herself; she declared “BREXIT IS BREXIT”; and she set her ‘red lines’ and undemocratically she began the withdrawal negotiations with the E.U.

THERESA MAY INSISTED ON A ‘WHIPPED VOTE’ IN PARLIAMENT IN ORDER TO PASS “ARTICLE 50” & SECURE THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ – Without any LEGALITY at all.

But, the worst thing about the ‘Ballot Paper’ was the fact that it provided no information whatsoever, about the ‘Disadvantages’ on leaving the E.U. The ‘Ballot Paper’ failed to advise the British people voting in that Referendum, that if they voted to ‘LEAVE’ the E.U.; they would also be leaving, ALL PROTECTION OF LAW, as well.

The only protection of LAW that they had, and have, is the protection of the “European Court of Justice” and the “European Human Rights Law”.

 The ‘elite’ establishment of MONARCHY, JUDICIARY, GOVERNMENT & PARLIAMENT does not provide any protection of ‘LAW’ at all. There is no, “Written Constitution”, “Bill of Rights”; or “Supreme Court of Law” where it is possible to test question or challenge the ‘abuse’ and the ‘prejudice’ of Parliament, from within ‘LAW’.

BORIS JOHNSON’s ‘lies’,

BORIS JOHNSON throughout the Referendum ‘LEAVE’ campaign repeatedly told lie after lie in support of that campaign. They were not only ‘lies’ they were ‘FACTUAL PROMISES’ promised to the voter, if they voted to, ‘LEAVE“

1. If you vote to leave the E.U. trade with Europe will continue uninterrupted precisely as it does now“
2. "If you vote to leave the E.U. trade with the rest of the World would be enhanced”.“
3. "If you vote to leave the E.U. ‘£350,000 per week presently paid to the E.U. would become available for the NHS” (The National Health Service”)
4. THESE LIES WERE, THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF TELEVISION, TRANSMITTED TO EVERY TV RECEIVER THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY. THEY WERE ALSO WIDELY PUBLISHED IN EVERY NATIONAL NEWSPAPER. SO THESE ‘LIES’ WERE WHOLLY AVAILABLE TO BE SEEN AND HEARD, THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PUBLIC DOMAIN. 
5. This being the fact of the matter, it is safe to assert that BORIS JOHNSON’S ‘LIES’; ‘could have corrupted’ the final vote declared in that Referendum. Sufficient, therefore, for any honest Court to determine and declare the Referendum vote of 2016, to be UNSAFE. And, must not no longer be relied upon.

 “ARTICLE 50” and the “Whipped Vote

The WHIPS in parliament have no LEGALITY at all.

They are not ‘entrenched’ in LAW. And,

Throughout the entire National Archive of Great Britain there is not one legal document verifying the right and use of the “WHIPS” in Parliament.

When the WHIPS instruct ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this overrules and supplants all rightful influence placed upon those Members, by the Constituents. That elected those Members in the first place.

This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”. Which is wholly proscribed by the ‘peoples protection’ provided by the “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

This paragraph of the “Bill of Rights 1689” specifically instructs Parliament; that Parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only upon the conditions that parliament, “OUGHT NOT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

This paragraph of that Bill, “The Said Rights Claimed” is the over-all superior authority of the Bill; for it states within its text, that it is the authority over “any of the ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill.

Here is the text of, "The Said Rights Claimed"

The, “Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

There is no doubt whatsoever, that according to ‘LAW’ BREXIT has no LEGALITY whatsoever. The Courts must now declare, BREXIT IS UNLAWFUL.