BRITISH SO-CALLED 'FREE PRESS'...

The British so-called ‘Free Press’ is naught but a joke:

How rotten and corrupt this so-called "Free Press" is in our country today. And, how, 'selective' they are, in vilifying that which they do not like or, those, that they deem to have done something wrong.

When, ever has this so-called rotten 'Free Press and Media' turned its investigative searchlight upon the real injustices? As, highlighted here:

1. A 'Reigning Monarch' that has broken the Law every day throughout her entire reign?  ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured the requirement and duty of all 'Reigning Monarchs' that sit upon the English throne, once, throughout her entire reign. She has failed to honour the 'Original Contract' requiring the, protection of the Crown's Subjects', throughout all of the time she has occupied the throne.

 

King James the Second was removed from the throne in 1688 by the CONVENTION (Parliament) for: "Breaking the Original Contract betwixt King and People"; and, in respect to the 'Lineal Descent' (all subsequent 'Reigning Monarch's'), the CONVENTION ruled and determined that,

 

 "The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor broke the Contract, the Successor can also be Deposed".

 

The ‘Original Contract’ is an unwritten contract founded upon the principle established in, Ole English Law, that, “Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord”. There are many who today claim that there is no such thing as the ‘Original Contract’, and, they claim, that as such, that it has no validity in Law. But, the very proof of its true existence and its establishment and entrenchment in ‘English Law’ is determined by the fact, that King James II was removed from the throne for, “Breaking the Original Contract’; and, that, Prince William of Orange, then became the next King.

When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.
 

2. The illegal activities of the political party WHIPS in parliament; whose political activities in Parliament 'prejudice the people' and, thereby, flout and breach the precedent of law set out in, "The Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

This paragraph, 'The Said Rights Claimed', set out within the 'Bill of Rights 1689' makes it abundantly clear that when Parliament 'enacts' its Supremacy, (legally afforded to Parliament by Article 9 of that Bill); or, if Parliament should 'enact' any of the other "Premises" of that Bill; Parliament should not 'prejudice the people'. The political party WHIPS and their political party activities within Parliament, thereby, has no legality at all.

When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.
 

3. The British Judiciary has always denied the People of this country the right to test, question, or challenge Parliament from within, LAW. The judiciary has persistently, ever since the very creation of the 'Bill of Rights 1689' determined and ruled in their Courts that "Article 9" of this Bill, establishes, in, LAW, that Parliament and the business of Parliament cannot be challenged in the Courts. Yet, the very same 'Bill of Rights 1689', if it is read and interpreted correctly, and, in its entirety, determines to the contrary, that anyone may challenge Parliament from within LAW; whenever Parliament 'prejudice the people'. The, paragraph within the Bill, "The Said Rights Claimed", verifying that right.

For more than 326 years the British Judiciary has denied the British people that right.

 When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.
 

4. Each 'Reigning Monarch' of England sitting upon the throne is charged with the responsibility of honouring the 'Original Contract' requiring the, protection of the Crown's Subjects; protecting them from the tyranny of the abuses and the prejudice of parliament.

In order for each Monarch, to carry out that duty, each 'Reigning Monarch' is provided with two legal instruments to assist them in carrying out that role. These legal instruments are: the Royal Assent and the Royal Prerogative. These two legal instruments have been solely designed in order that the 'Reigning Monarch' can protect the People. They have no other function or purpose at all.

The Royal Assent provides each 'Reigning Monarch' with the right and duty to monitor parliament and the Laws and Bills passed by parliament in order to see whether they have been created and passed honestly in parliament, without corruption; to, grant, or, to refuse to grant, the Royal Assent, as the case maybe.

It is interesting to note: that the last time a British 'Reigning Monarch' refused to grant the Royal Assent, was on the 11^th March 1708, when Queen Anne refused it, for a Bill for settling the militia in Scotland.

 

Thus, the British People, are then expected to believe, that every Law or Bill passed by Parliament since the 11th March 1708, is honest and without corruption. Yet, that is positively absurd. Hundreds of Bills and Laws have been created and passed in parliament under the influence of the political party WHIPS; yet, as already established above, the political activities of the WHIPS in parliament has no legality at all.

 

Today, the British do not have a ‘Reigning Monarch’ sitting upon the English throne; they merely have a village sub-postmistress franking and rubber-stamping every piece of paper laid before her, by parliament. Today, the British ‘Reigning Monarch’, abdicates the throne.

When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.

 

5. The Royal Prerogative provides each 'Reigning Monarch' with three options:

(a), to advise Ministers of Government.

(b), to warn Ministers of Government.

(c), whenever the wishes of the people are in direct conflict with the actions of the legislators, (Parliament), to order the dissolution of Parliament.

 

Yet, when, in the aftermath of the democratic General Election of 2010, when the people had voted in order to determine firstly, that no political party should have a majority in Parliament, and, secondly, that there should be a "Conservative led Minority Government"; the leaders of the political parties elected to Parliament in that election, did not like that 'People's Verdict'; so, they determined, that they could 'ignore' the People's vote and thence to proceed to create a government entirely on their own. In 'ignoring' the People's vote in this way they 'prejudiced the people'; and, thereby flouted and breached the "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed".

 

Here, then, was the clear evidence that, "The wishes of the people had been directly in conflict with the actions of parliament"; yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, did absolutely nothing. She did not intervene to protect her people.. She ought to have ordered the immediate dissolution of Parliament. In consequence, today, the British People are being governed by an illegal coalition administration, that was not ‘elected’ at all.

  When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.

 

6. The British People have no right of access to:

A. written constitution;

A. proper 'Bill of Rights'; setting out the 'true citizenship'; and, the rights, and the responsibilities of, CITIZENS.

A. 'Supreme Court of Law'; where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the abuses and the prejudice of parliament, from within, Law.

There is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the English throne, charged with the responsibility of protecting 'Subjects'; yet, she provides no protection at all.

The consequence of all of this, wholly verifying, that the British, have no protection of law at all.

When has the so-called free press, ever turned its searchlight upon this.


A FREE PRESS?
No, not, at all. A, corrupt and rotten Press and Media, that does not investigate the wrong doing of the 'elite and the establishment' which it promotes and props up constantly. A, Press and Media, that does not report 'news'; but wickedly, speculates, assumes, and invents, all of the time. It, also elects to hurt, wound, vilify and defame, all it sets its sights upon.

 

In this nigh, "Totalitarian State", Britain has now become, the so-called, ‘Free Press and Media’, are the very worst tyranny of all.

 

 The 'elite' and the 'establishment' of Monarchy, Parliament, Politicians and the political parties; and, the Judiciary; all look upon 'LAW' as being something only the common people must obey. Whilst, they all, with impunity, flout and breach law every day.