THE TEST FOR PARTICIPATION IN BRITISH DEMOCRACY

ANSWERS TO THE TEST FOR ‘BRITISH DEMOCRACY’

 

If you cannot answer these questions, you are unable to participate.

And, in consequence, Britain cannot be a Democracy. Because, if you do not know these answers; you, cannot know, what, Democracy, is.

 

This test determines whether you know how to participate properly in, BRITISH DEMOCRACY:

 

Here are the answers you should have known:

 

Question 1.

The American People have the, protection of law, provided for them, in a 'Written Constitution', 'Bill of Rights', and, the right of access, to a "Supreme Court of Law".

 What, in comparison, do the British have in order to provide them with the same protection?

 The British do not have the same protection of law that the American’s have; but they should be afforded the ‘protection of law’ as provided by, the ‘Reigning Monarch’ sitting upon the British throne; as required; by the, ‘Original Contract’. This ‘contract’ is unwritten, but it is fully entrenched in LAW, and, it requires all ‘Reigning Monarchs’, to act as Head of Government; to monitor parliament; in the interests of all Subjects of the Crown. The ‘Reigning Monarch’ is required to protect the people from the tyranny of the ‘abuses’ and ‘prejudice’ of parliament.

 The British also have the protection of Law, provided by the provision of the over-ruling paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed”, set out in the “Bill of Rights 1689”; which instructs parliament that when it applies its “Supremacy”, nothing should ‘prejudice’ the people.

 Question 2.

The British people elect their Parliament in General Election.

When a Parliament is elected at present, is it a democratic 'people's parliament'?

Answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’? And, explain how and why.

The answer is ‘No’. The people in democratic general elections elect their political representatives to represent them in parliament; but, the majority of those elected, on being elected, accept and comply with the ‘diktat’ and instructions issued by their political party, WHIP; and, therefore, they give the priority ‘allegiance’ to their political party; in preference, to those that elected them.

 

Question 3.

Parliament has an office and a procedure known as the 'WHIPS'

What are the 'WHIPS'?

What do the 'WHIPS' do?

What the WHIPS do, is this legal?

Explain how and why.

The political party WHIPS in parliament instruct Members of Parliament on how they must behave in Parliament, and, how they must vote.

This political party activity is wholly illegal.

It, ‘prejudices the people’, by over-ruling and supplanting all rightful influence placed upon those ‘elected’ Members of Parliament, by the Constituent.

This, flouts, breaches, and breaks the ‘precedent of law’, providing the protection of the people set out in, “The Said Rights Claimed”, the, over-ruling paragraph of the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”; which determines that when parliament enacts it “Supremacy”, nothing should prejudice the people.

 

Question 4.

The British Judiciary has always denied the people all right to challenge parliament in law.

How do the Judiciary deny this right?

Is that 'denial' lawful? Or, unlawful?

Explain how and why.

The Judiciary deny the people this right by incorrectly reading and interpreting the “Bill of Rights 1689”. The Judiciary has always claimed and ruled that “Article 9” of that Bill, protects parliament from all challenge from within LAW; Article 9, reads as follows:

 “That the Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament”

And, the Judiciary has always claimed and ruled that this prevents all challenge to parliament in the Courts. But, the correct reading and interpretation of the entire “Bill of Rights 1689” reveals the existence within that Bill of the paragraph “The Said Rights Claimed”; and, this determines that anyone is free, in law, to challenge parliament in the Courts; if, and, whenever, parliament ‘prejudice the people’.

 Question 5.

The British Parliament claims its "Supremacy".

Explain:

How parliament got this 'Supremacy' ?

What is the 'Supremacy' for?

Does anything 'overrule' this "Supremacy”?

 

The, GLORIOUS REVOLUTION and the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 set up by Prince William of Orange, created a ‘Rights Committee’ in order that they could produce a list of ‘rights’ parliament required, of a King. Parliament did not want to have to put up with the same interferences that it had endured under the previous King. King James the Second; who the CONVENTION, had removed from the throne. This ‘Rights Committee’ produced the “Bill of Rights 1689” which under “Article 9” provided parliament with it “Supremacy”.

Parliaments “Supremacy” provides that the Freedom of Speech, Debates, and Proceedings of Parliament, are protected by law.

Parliaments “Supremacy” can be over-ruled, by the authority and, ‘precedent of law’, set out in the paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed” within the “Bill of Rights 1689”. Which provides, that anyone may challenge parliament if and whenever parliament, ‘prejudice the people’.

Question 6.

Each 'Reigning Monarch' sitting on the throne is provided with two legal instruments which enable them to do 'something important’ in respect to parliament.

What are these 'legal instruments' called?

What are they for?

One of these legal instruments is involved in a particular way with every Bill or Act passed by parliament.

Explain:

How?

When was the last time this instrument was used?

These legal instruments are: “The Royal Assent” and “The Royal Prerogative”.

They are provided to the ‘Reigning Monarch’ and, they have been specifically designed for only one purpose, the protection of the “Crown’s Subjects’. They have no other purpose at all.

One of these ‘legal instruments’ the “Royal Assent” is provided in order that, the ‘Reigning Monarch’; whose duty it is to protect the Crown’s Subjects; shall monitor parliament and the Bills and Laws created by parliament, in order to see whether they are created honestly and without corruption; granting the “Royal Assent” if they are in the interests of the country and the Crown’s Subjects; refusing, the ‘Assent’ if they are not.

The Royal Assent has not been refused since 11^th March 1708, when Queen Anne refused it for a Bill for settling the militia in Scotland.

 Question 7.

It is universally believed throughout our land, and, the British People have always been taught, that the most important thing about the 'Glorious Revolution' is that it provided Parliament with its "Supremacy".

But, is this the most important feature of the 'Glorious Revolution’?

What other more important features did it produce?

Parliaments “Supremacy” is not the most important feature provided by the “Glorious Revolution”.

The most important feature of the ‘Glorious Revolution’ and the CONVENTION (Parliament) it created; is the paragraph within the ‘Bill of Rights 1689’ created by the ‘Rights Committee’; for the protection of the people. This paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed” over-rules all other ‘Premises’ of the Bill, including, even the “Supremacy” of parliament itself, whenever parliament ‘prejudice the people’.

This is the most important feature provided by the, “Glorious Revolution”.

 Question 8.

King James the Second was removed from the English throne.

Explain:

How and why?

What affect does this have on the present 'Reigning Monarch' of today?

KING JAMES II was removed from the throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 for, “Breaking the Original Contract betwixt King and People”. The CONVENTION ruled and determined that he had thereby ‘abdicated’ his duty and that thereby he had ‘abdicated’ the throne. The CONVENTION declared the throne was, Vacant. And, Prince William of Orange was offered the throne. He accepted, and, became the next King.

This decision of the CONVENTION affects not only the present ‘Reigning Monarch’ sitting upon the throne; but, also all other ‘Reigning Monarch’s’ in the “Line of Succession” who would also occupy the throne. For, the CONVENTION ruled in respect the “Lineal Descent”, that, “The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor broke the Contract, they too can be Deposed”.

 

Question 9.

In order for a country to be a true democracy certain criterion must apply.

What are these conditions?

Does your country meet this criterion?

Explain how and why?

In any country claiming to be a, DEMOCRACY, only one criterion applies:

A, GOVERNMENT AND A PARLIAMENT, WHERE THE PEOPLE GOVERN THEMSELVES.

DEMOCRACY; is, “Government of the people, by the people, and, for the people.”

All other forms of Government are naught, but, the Totalitarian Regime.

 

Question 10.

In the UK National Census of 2011 the total adult population (being over the age of 20)

was declared to be 48,085,800.

Explain:

How many are there in the total membership of all the political parties, in the country?

Is it right that this tiny minority dominates and controls virtually every aspect of life, in the country?

How is this political party domination and control maintained?

 

The political parties in the country treat their Membership numbers as a ‘State Secret’ and, as highly confidential. Only the Labour Party immediately revealed these numbers when asked. The Tory and Liberal parties arrogantly refused to disclose. However, by diligent research it was ascertained that the total political party Membership in the country, was slightly less than, 400,000.

Is it right that this ‘less than 400,000’ should dominate and control virtually every aspect of the life of the, very slightly less, than 48,085,800 adults in the land; this is wrong; and, it is positively obscene.

This domination and control of the political parties in and over our lives is unlawfully maintained by the activities of the political party WHIPS in parliament; political, activities, having no legality, at all.

 

Question 11.

If you vote in General Elections,

What do you vote for?

What should you be voting for?

In General Elections the people afforded the right and the privilege of voting; they should be voting in order to select their ‘political representative’ to represent them and their interests in parliament.

THEY SHOULD NOT BE VOTING FOR A POLITICAL PARTY.

 

Question 12.

What is the "Original Contract”?

Explain in full detail:

How it came about?

What it is for? 

The ‘Original Contract’ is an unwritten contract; but, it is fully entrenched and established in Law. It derives from the long since distant days of the past, when there were many ‘Lords’ and ‘Kings’, constantly fighting each other for power and control. The, common people of the land, the, ‘serfs’, of that time; would give ‘allegiance’ to their Lord and Master for the protection of their, Lord and Master. And, when the British Monarchy was first formed this ‘idea’ was then adopted, as the requirement, of a King.

 “Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord, for the protection of the Liege Lord”.

That, is the basis and the, concept, of the ‘Original Contract’.

What is it for? The ‘Original Contract’ is the requirement upon every ‘Reigning Monarch’, in the, ‘Line of Succession’, requiring them to act as ‘Head of Government; to, monitor parliament, in order to verify that the Laws and Bills passed by parliament have been created without corruption; and, that they are, in the interests of the country and its people. The ‘contract’ requires the ‘Reigning Monarch’ to protect, all the ‘Crown’s Subjects from the tyranny of the ‘abuses’ and the ‘prejudice’ of parliament.

Any, ‘Reigning Monarch’, failing to honour the ‘Original Contract’; ABDICATES THE THRONE. Precedent in law for this is determined, by the fact, that KING JAMES II, a living and lawful King, was removed from the throne.

 

Please note:

If, you cannot answer, all these questions posed above.

It is not your fault. You are not to blame.

Blame, must be laid at the door of the crass negligence and the fault of the inadequate entire British education curriculum; and, the way, that you were taught.