Challenging
the illegal activities of,
The
political party, ‘WHIPS’, in Parliament.
I
am looking for two things,
Firstly, I am looking for, a law practise, that will have the courage to
challenge Parliament; and, I am exploring the costs, in employing an expert
constitutional lawyer and Barrister who will take on this case and follow the
instructions as set out below.
Secondly, I am looking for all reasonably intelligent people, who are
financially able to contribute to the costs of this endeavour; intent on
creating, a true, DEMOCRACY.
Purpose: In order to test, question, and challenge the true legal
validity of the present 'unlawful' political activities of the political party
WHIPS, in Parliament, from within law.
Actual project: To force the British Judiciary to officially recognize
and rule that the paragraph known as, “The
Said Rights Claimed”, set out and recorded in the “Bill of Rights 1689”, has
true legal validity. That, in truth and reality, and, by ‘precedent of law’; it
has far greater authority than, the, ‘Supremacy of Parliament’.
To force the Judiciary to rule, that this ‘paragraph’ is the overall
‘authority’ of the entire Bill.
Rationale:
The political party leaders and, 'Members of Parliament' continuously 'strut the TV broadcasting news studios' consistently indoctrinating "The People", on what they intend to do, with our 'lives', if elected to govern. Knowing, only too well, that on being 'elected', "The People", will then have no further 'participation' at all.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY.
DEMOCRACY is all of "The People" governing themselves.
Government and Parliament, ‘of the people', 'by the people', and, 'for the people'. DEMOCRACY is not; and, it never can be, both Government and Parliament wholly dominated and controlled by political parties.
That is not, DEMOCRACY;
That is the, "Totalitarian Regime'.
I am only concerned here, that if any new law or policy is introduced by Government in Parliament; that this new legislation should only be created and passed as law, after the full FREE VOTE, of a democratically elected Parliament. And, that, it does not become, 'LAW', merely under the influence of the 'WHIPS' and, the 'diktat' of the political parties.
I want to challenge the present illegal political party activities of the, WHIPS, in Parliament. Political, activity, which by, 'precedent of law’, has no legality at all.
How do we challenge the political party 'WHIPS' in parliament?
Explanation:
The entire British Judiciary in a, 'conspiracy to pervert the course of justice', has always misread and misinterpreted the "Bill of Rights 1689". They have always misinterpreted this Bill and ruled that, "challenge to parliament", in the Courts, is denied; relying, always, upon the text of "Article 9" of that Bill, for that denial. This reads as follows:
"The Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament"
The Judiciary has always determined and ruled, that, this sentence; without any other considerations at all; prevents, by law, all challenge to the business of Parliament, in the Courts. In any case or matter before the Courts where evidence is presented even mentioning any of the business of parliament, the Judge has always stopped the proceedings at once, in the Court, ruling that, "Article 9" prevents all challenge.
Actually, the correct reading and interpretation of the whole of the "Bill of Rights 1689", reveals another ‘paragraph’ of that Bill that is actually and, in law, the overall 'authority' of that Bill; because, the text, set out in this, ‘paragraph’, asserts, that it has the authority over all the "Premises" of the Bill. This paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament enacts or applies any of the "Premises" of the Bill; that, nothing, "ought prejudice the people".
Rationale:
The political party leaders and, 'Members of Parliament' continuously 'strut the TV broadcasting news studios' consistently indoctrinating "The People", on what they intend to do, with our 'lives', if elected to govern. Knowing, only too well, that on being 'elected', "The People", will then have no further 'participation' at all.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY.
DEMOCRACY is all of "The People" governing themselves.
Government and Parliament, ‘of the people', 'by the people', and, 'for the people'. DEMOCRACY is not; and, it never can be, both Government and Parliament wholly dominated and controlled by political parties.
That is not, DEMOCRACY;
That is the, "Totalitarian Regime'.
I am only concerned here, that if any new law or policy is introduced by Government in Parliament; that this new legislation should only be created and passed as law, after the full FREE VOTE, of a democratically elected Parliament. And, that, it does not become, 'LAW', merely under the influence of the 'WHIPS' and, the 'diktat' of the political parties.
I want to challenge the present illegal political party activities of the, WHIPS, in Parliament. Political, activity, which by, 'precedent of law’, has no legality at all.
How do we challenge the political party 'WHIPS' in parliament?
Explanation:
The entire British Judiciary in a, 'conspiracy to pervert the course of justice', has always misread and misinterpreted the "Bill of Rights 1689". They have always misinterpreted this Bill and ruled that, "challenge to parliament", in the Courts, is denied; relying, always, upon the text of "Article 9" of that Bill, for that denial. This reads as follows:
"The Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament"
The Judiciary has always determined and ruled, that, this sentence; without any other considerations at all; prevents, by law, all challenge to the business of Parliament, in the Courts. In any case or matter before the Courts where evidence is presented even mentioning any of the business of parliament, the Judge has always stopped the proceedings at once, in the Court, ruling that, "Article 9" prevents all challenge.
Actually, the correct reading and interpretation of the whole of the "Bill of Rights 1689", reveals another ‘paragraph’ of that Bill that is actually and, in law, the overall 'authority' of that Bill; because, the text, set out in this, ‘paragraph’, asserts, that it has the authority over all the "Premises" of the Bill. This paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament enacts or applies any of the "Premises" of the Bill; that, nothing, "ought prejudice the people".
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist
upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and
that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the
People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter,
into Consequence or Example”
In "prejudicing the people" in this way; the political party "WHIPS" in parliament, has no legality at all.
But, in any legal action here proposed, we shall not test the Judiciary, over this. We will not challenge Parliament in the Courts at all. We are merely going to challenge the Judiciary, in the Courts; forcing the Judiciary, to properly recognise and rule that the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", in the "Bill of Rights 1689", has 'equal' or more legal authority, than the "Supremacy of Parliament" itself.
"Article 9", of that Bill, provides the legality for the, "Supremacy of Parliament"; and, it is one of the, "Premises", of that Bill. However, the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", has the authority, over all the, "Premises", of that Bill. Therefore, this paragraph has the greater authority. “The Said Rights Claimed” overrules “Article 9”, whenever, Parliament, “prejudice the people”.
When the Judiciary are forced to recognise the true legality of, "The Said Rights Claimed"; the political parties in Parliament will no longer be able to use the ""WHIPS" in order to create and pass corrupt "LAW". Every vote taken in parliament, thereafter, would become, a FREE VOTE. And, a true DEMOCRACY will be born.
A true DEMOCRACY where, new laws and restrictions, or any other legislation; could only be passed in parliament, after proper debate and discussion of all the 'pros' and 'cons', and, after a, FREE VOTE of Parliament has taken place. No more, just, the arrogant diktat of a corrupt political party leader, corruptly forcing the vote through Parliament, by the use of the political party, WHIPS.
Read my book “DEMOCRACY” available here:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
Gordon J Sheppard
No comments:
Post a Comment