Nom Dom's Taxation Status
In view of the fact that ED MILLGAN and the Labour Party have now declared that if they win the General Election and are elected to govern, that they will abolish the 'Non Dom's' present taxation status; forcing them to pay more tax. I therefore propose that all 'Non Dom's' likely to be affected by this proposal and this, 'totalitarian' arrogance; to seriously consider the following suggestion:
Collectively, all join together speaking with 'one voice' and, all contributing an 'equal financial' contribution; or, contributing more if they wished to do so; in order to employ the most expert and distinguished constitutional law Barrister; in order to test, question, and challenge the true legal validity of the 'unlawful' political activities of the political party WHIPS, in Parliament.
Rationale:
The political party leaders and, 'Members of Parliament' continuously 'strut the TV broadcasting news studios' consistently indoctrinating "The People", on what they intend to do, with our 'lives', if elected to govern. Knowing, only too well, that on being 'elected', "The People", will then have no further 'participation' at all.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY.
DEMOCRACY is all of "The People" governing themselves.
Government and Parliament 'of the people', 'by the people', and, 'for the people'. DEMOCRACY is not; and, it never can be, both Government and Parliament wholly dominated and controlled by political parties.
That is not, DEMOCRACY;
That is the, "totalitarian regime', of the very worst kind.
I am not concerned here about the issue as to whether some 'Non Dom's’ ought to be paying more taxation, or not. I am only concerned here, that if a law abolishing the 'Non Dom's present status is introduced, that this decision should be arrived at by the full FREE VOTE, of a democratically elected Parliament. And, that, it does not become 'LAW', merely under the influence of the 'WHIPS' and, the 'diktat' of the political parties.
That is why I advise and propose that all 'Non Dom's put up the money, (at least one million pounds), making it possible to challenge the present illegal political party activities of the, WHIPS, in Parliament; Political activity, which by 'precedent of law’, has no legality at all.
How do we challenge the political party 'WHIPS' in parliament?
Explanation:
The entire British Judiciary in a, 'conspiracy to pervert the course of justice', has always misread and misinterpreted the "Bill of Rights 1689". They have always misinterpreted it and ruled that, "challenge to parliament", in the Courts, is not permissible; relying, always, upon the text of "Article 9" of that Bill for that denial. This reads as follows:
"The Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament"
And, the Judiciary has always accepted and ruled that this, without any other considerations at all, prevents, by law, all challenge to the business of Parliament, in the Courts. In any case or matter before the Courts where evidence is presented even mentioning any of the business of parliament, the Judge has always stopped the proceedings at once, in the Court, ruling that, "Article 9" prevents all challenge.
Actually, the correct reading and interpretation of the whole of the "Bill of Rights 1689", reveals another paragraph of that Bill that is actually and, in law, the overall 'authority' of that Bill; because, the text, set out in that paragraph, asserts, that it has the authority over all the "Premises" of the Bill. This paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament enacts or applies any of the "Premises" of the Bill; that nothing, "ought prejudice the people".
In view of the fact that ED MILLGAN and the Labour Party have now declared that if they win the General Election and are elected to govern, that they will abolish the 'Non Dom's' present taxation status; forcing them to pay more tax. I therefore propose that all 'Non Dom's' likely to be affected by this proposal and this, 'totalitarian' arrogance; to seriously consider the following suggestion:
Collectively, all join together speaking with 'one voice' and, all contributing an 'equal financial' contribution; or, contributing more if they wished to do so; in order to employ the most expert and distinguished constitutional law Barrister; in order to test, question, and challenge the true legal validity of the 'unlawful' political activities of the political party WHIPS, in Parliament.
Rationale:
The political party leaders and, 'Members of Parliament' continuously 'strut the TV broadcasting news studios' consistently indoctrinating "The People", on what they intend to do, with our 'lives', if elected to govern. Knowing, only too well, that on being 'elected', "The People", will then have no further 'participation' at all.
THIS IS NOT DEMOCRACY.
DEMOCRACY is all of "The People" governing themselves.
Government and Parliament 'of the people', 'by the people', and, 'for the people'. DEMOCRACY is not; and, it never can be, both Government and Parliament wholly dominated and controlled by political parties.
That is not, DEMOCRACY;
That is the, "totalitarian regime', of the very worst kind.
I am not concerned here about the issue as to whether some 'Non Dom's’ ought to be paying more taxation, or not. I am only concerned here, that if a law abolishing the 'Non Dom's present status is introduced, that this decision should be arrived at by the full FREE VOTE, of a democratically elected Parliament. And, that, it does not become 'LAW', merely under the influence of the 'WHIPS' and, the 'diktat' of the political parties.
That is why I advise and propose that all 'Non Dom's put up the money, (at least one million pounds), making it possible to challenge the present illegal political party activities of the, WHIPS, in Parliament; Political activity, which by 'precedent of law’, has no legality at all.
How do we challenge the political party 'WHIPS' in parliament?
Explanation:
The entire British Judiciary in a, 'conspiracy to pervert the course of justice', has always misread and misinterpreted the "Bill of Rights 1689". They have always misinterpreted it and ruled that, "challenge to parliament", in the Courts, is not permissible; relying, always, upon the text of "Article 9" of that Bill for that denial. This reads as follows:
"The Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament"
And, the Judiciary has always accepted and ruled that this, without any other considerations at all, prevents, by law, all challenge to the business of Parliament, in the Courts. In any case or matter before the Courts where evidence is presented even mentioning any of the business of parliament, the Judge has always stopped the proceedings at once, in the Court, ruling that, "Article 9" prevents all challenge.
Actually, the correct reading and interpretation of the whole of the "Bill of Rights 1689", reveals another paragraph of that Bill that is actually and, in law, the overall 'authority' of that Bill; because, the text, set out in that paragraph, asserts, that it has the authority over all the "Premises" of the Bill. This paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament enacts or applies any of the "Premises" of the Bill; that nothing, "ought prejudice the people".
Here
is that paragraph in the Bill:
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist
upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and
that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the
People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter,
into Consequence or Example”
The
political party activities of the "WHIPS" in parliament does
"prejudice the people"; because, the instructions the
"WHIPS" give to each Member of Parliament, each week, instructing
them on how they must vote; overrules and supplants all rightful influence
placed upon those 'elected' Members of Parliament, by the Constituents.
In "prejudicing the people" in this way; the political party "WHIPS" in parliament, has no legality at all.
But, in any legal action proposed, we shall not test the Judiciary, over this. We will not challenge Parliament in the Courts at all. We are merely going to challenge the Judiciary, in the Courts; forcing the Judiciary, to properly recognise and rule that the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", in the "Bill of Rights 1689", has 'equal' or more legal authority, than the "Supremacy of Parliament" itself.
"Article 9", of that Bill, provides the legality for this, "Supremacy of Parliament" and, it is one of the "Premises", of that Bill; and, "The Said Rights Claimed", has the authority, over all the, "Premises", of that Bill.
When the Judiciary are forced to recognise the true legality of, "The Said Rights Claimed"; the political parties in Parliament will no longer be able to use the ""WHIPS" in order to create and pass corrupt "LAW". Every vote taken in parliament thereafter, would become, a FREE VOTE. And, a true DEMOCRACY will be born.
Where, new laws and restrictions, in respect of "Non Dom's", or any other legislation, could only be passed in parliament, after proper debate and discussion of all the 'pros' and 'cons', and, after a, FREE VOTE, of Parliament has taken place. No more, just, the arrogant diktat of a corrupt political party leader, corruptly forcing the vote through Parliament, by the use of the political party, WHIPS.
I urge all the 116,000 'Nom Dom's' that there are in the country, to put up the money. Collectively, they can easily afford it; and, that money would not only provide protection for the 'Non Dom's', it might also help to create a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.
In "prejudicing the people" in this way; the political party "WHIPS" in parliament, has no legality at all.
But, in any legal action proposed, we shall not test the Judiciary, over this. We will not challenge Parliament in the Courts at all. We are merely going to challenge the Judiciary, in the Courts; forcing the Judiciary, to properly recognise and rule that the paragraph, "The Said Rights Claimed", in the "Bill of Rights 1689", has 'equal' or more legal authority, than the "Supremacy of Parliament" itself.
"Article 9", of that Bill, provides the legality for this, "Supremacy of Parliament" and, it is one of the "Premises", of that Bill; and, "The Said Rights Claimed", has the authority, over all the, "Premises", of that Bill.
When the Judiciary are forced to recognise the true legality of, "The Said Rights Claimed"; the political parties in Parliament will no longer be able to use the ""WHIPS" in order to create and pass corrupt "LAW". Every vote taken in parliament thereafter, would become, a FREE VOTE. And, a true DEMOCRACY will be born.
Where, new laws and restrictions, in respect of "Non Dom's", or any other legislation, could only be passed in parliament, after proper debate and discussion of all the 'pros' and 'cons', and, after a, FREE VOTE, of Parliament has taken place. No more, just, the arrogant diktat of a corrupt political party leader, corruptly forcing the vote through Parliament, by the use of the political party, WHIPS.
I urge all the 116,000 'Nom Dom's' that there are in the country, to put up the money. Collectively, they can easily afford it; and, that money would not only provide protection for the 'Non Dom's', it might also help to create a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.
No comments:
Post a Comment