DAVID CAMERON’s MANDATE...
In
a summit conference in Latvia David Cameron lectured the European Union Leaders
asserting that the British were fed up and concerned over the more closer
relations with the EU.; he declared that the British people wanted immediate
reform. He asserted that with his recent General Election, 'victory', he now
had the mandate to press the EU for that reform.
Well, that election 'victory' may have delivered a thirteen seat majority for David Cameron and his Tory party in parliament; but, the voting results of that 'election' do not verify, that he has the overall confidence of the British people. And, therefore, he cannot speak for all of the, 'British', at all. He most certainly cannot speak for me.
David Cameron's 'victory' in that election gave him a thirteen seat majority in parliament; but, in the overall voting of the people, he had no 'victory' whatsoever. His so-called 'MANDATE' rests solely on the fact that, 11,334,576 votes were cast for his Tory party; but, 19,361,259 people voted against him and, his Tory party. And, the policies he proposed. Thus, giving him, no true 'MANDATE' to 'speak' for all of the, 'British', at all.
I assert that this determines that he certainly has no true 'MANDATE' of the people allowing him to lecture the "European Union", demanding immediate reform.
I welcome, ever closer relations with the EU; the European Union provides me with the only protection of 'LAW' that I have. The, "EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT".
My, ‘Reigning Monarch’, Judiciary, Government, and, Parliament; denies me all protection of law.
The British do not have a 'Written Constitution' or, a 'Bill of Rights'; or, access to, a "Supreme Court of Law"; where it is possible to test question or challenge the abuses and the prejudice of parliament, from within Law. Furthermore, there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the English throne, charged by 'precedent of law', to provide the 'Subject's' protection. Yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, throughout her entire reign, has failed to provide that protection. She has two 'legal instruments' available to her that has been specifically designed for the ' Subjects' protection. Yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has not used them at all.
THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT IS THE ONLY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW', THAT THE BRITISH HAVE.
Read my book "DEMOCRACY" available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984Well, that election 'victory' may have delivered a thirteen seat majority for David Cameron and his Tory party in parliament; but, the voting results of that 'election' do not verify, that he has the overall confidence of the British people. And, therefore, he cannot speak for all of the, 'British', at all. He most certainly cannot speak for me.
David Cameron's 'victory' in that election gave him a thirteen seat majority in parliament; but, in the overall voting of the people, he had no 'victory' whatsoever. His so-called 'MANDATE' rests solely on the fact that, 11,334,576 votes were cast for his Tory party; but, 19,361,259 people voted against him and, his Tory party. And, the policies he proposed. Thus, giving him, no true 'MANDATE' to 'speak' for all of the, 'British', at all.
I assert that this determines that he certainly has no true 'MANDATE' of the people allowing him to lecture the "European Union", demanding immediate reform.
I welcome, ever closer relations with the EU; the European Union provides me with the only protection of 'LAW' that I have. The, "EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT".
My, ‘Reigning Monarch’, Judiciary, Government, and, Parliament; denies me all protection of law.
The British do not have a 'Written Constitution' or, a 'Bill of Rights'; or, access to, a "Supreme Court of Law"; where it is possible to test question or challenge the abuses and the prejudice of parliament, from within Law. Furthermore, there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the English throne, charged by 'precedent of law', to provide the 'Subject's' protection. Yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, throughout her entire reign, has failed to provide that protection. She has two 'legal instruments' available to her that has been specifically designed for the ' Subjects' protection. Yet, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has not used them at all.
THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT IS THE ONLY, 'PROTECTION OF LAW', THAT THE BRITISH HAVE.
No comments:
Post a Comment