Letter
sent to Michael Gove
Dear Sir
I never
attack anyone behind their back.
Hence, here
is a copy of my posting on social media today.
Gordon J
Sheppard
MICHAEL GOVE MINISTER OF JUSTICE
DAVID CAMERON appointing Michael Gove as Minister of Justice, is just like appointing ADOLF HITLER in charge of Jewish Affairs.
DAVID CAMERON appointing Michael Gove as Minister of Justice, is just like appointing ADOLF HITLER in charge of Jewish Affairs.
Michael
Gove is a 'totalitarian dictator'; just look at the way he treated with
sheer 'diktat' the Education portfolio he previously held.
No wonder DAVID CAMERON has given him the job to abolish the "European Human Rights Act"; TORY, totalitarianism, wants to destroy the only protection of LAW that 'The People' have. TORIES want total and absolute domination and control.
I warn every British adult in the country to vigorously oppose the abolition of this Act. It is the only real 'protection of law' that YOU have.
YOU have no Written Constitution.
YOU have no Bill of Rights setting out 'rights' and 'responsibilities'.
YOU have no access to a 'Supreme Court of Law' where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuse' and the 'prejudice' of parliament, from within LAW.
YOU
have a rotten and corrupt British Judiciary that lies and conspires
repeatedly; ruling that 'law' prevents the 'questioning' or 'challenge' to
parliament in the Courts; when, according to the actual true reading and
true interpretation of the, "Bill of Rights 1689", anyone
may challenge parliament in the Courts; whenever parliament, "Prejudice
the People".
Furthermore, YOU, have a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the throne who is charged with the responsibility and duty to honour the "Original Contract" requiring the 'Protection of the People'; yet, throughout the sixty odd years she has reigned, she has failed miserably, to provide that protection.
Note: The "Original Contract" is an unwritten contract but it is fully established in English LAW.
It derives from the concept that, "Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord". And, it was the, "Breaking of the Contract betwixt King and People", by King James the Second, that removed him from the throne. The CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 determined that by 'breaking this contract', he had 'Abdicated' the throne. They declared the throne was, "Vacant", and, Prince William of Orange succeeded as King. This CONVENTION further ruled that,
"The contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the contract he too can be Deposed".
ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured that contract throughout her entire reign.
Furthermore, YOU, have a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the throne who is charged with the responsibility and duty to honour the "Original Contract" requiring the 'Protection of the People'; yet, throughout the sixty odd years she has reigned, she has failed miserably, to provide that protection.
Note: The "Original Contract" is an unwritten contract but it is fully established in English LAW.
It derives from the concept that, "Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord". And, it was the, "Breaking of the Contract betwixt King and People", by King James the Second, that removed him from the throne. The CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 determined that by 'breaking this contract', he had 'Abdicated' the throne. They declared the throne was, "Vacant", and, Prince William of Orange succeeded as King. This CONVENTION further ruled that,
"The contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the contract he too can be Deposed".
ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not honoured that contract throughout her entire reign.
The
last time a 'Reigning Monarch' of England, protected the 'Crown's Subjects', and, refused to grant the "Royal Assent" to a Bill passed by
parliament; was on the, 11th March 1708; when Queen Anne refused the
'Assent' to the Bill, for "Settling the Militia in Scotland".
Thus,
the British People, are now expected to believe, that every Bill, and, every
Act, and, all of the business of parliament that has taken place in parliament
ever since that date; has been created without corruption. And,
that, is positively absurd. Because, every Bill or Act, or, all the
business of parliament that has been created and passed by parliament under the
influence of the 'WHIPS', has been unlawful.
The
'WHIPS', "Prejudice the People" by instructing Members of Parliament
on how they must vote; thereby, overruling and supplanting all 'rightful
influence' placed upon those 'elected' Members of Parliament, by the constituents.
And, this flouts and breaches the 'precedent of law' as set out and, is
determined by the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights
1689/"The Said Rights Claimed". Which, specifically instructs
parliament, that when parliament applies or 'enacts' any of the
"Premises" set out in the Bill, that nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE
THE PEOPLE".
The
'WHIPS', in parliament, has no 'legality' at all.
Sign
this petition to abolish the 'WHIPS': http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/create-a-true-democracy-abolish-the-whips-in-parliament-now
"Constitutional Monarchy" does not relieve the 'Reigning Monarch' from the responsibility and duty to honour the "Original Contract". Because, when the 'Constitutional' arrangement was first set up by both Monarchy and Government, neither put in place, an entirely different procedure for the protection of the people. This was the time when the Government ought to have introduced a, "Written Constitution" and a "Bill of Rights" and proper access to challenge the 'abuses' of parliament, from within law. Negligently, they ignored the plight of the people altogether as though they were of no consequence; thus, today, the British people have no protection of law whatsoever. Therefore, the, responsibility upon the 'Reigning Monarch', still stands.
"Constitutional Monarchy" does not relieve the 'Reigning Monarch' from the responsibility and duty to honour the "Original Contract". Because, when the 'Constitutional' arrangement was first set up by both Monarchy and Government, neither put in place, an entirely different procedure for the protection of the people. This was the time when the Government ought to have introduced a, "Written Constitution" and a "Bill of Rights" and proper access to challenge the 'abuses' of parliament, from within law. Negligently, they ignored the plight of the people altogether as though they were of no consequence; thus, today, the British people have no protection of law whatsoever. Therefore, the, responsibility upon the 'Reigning Monarch', still stands.
Read my
book "DEMOCRACY" available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. DO NOT ABOLISH THE ONLY PROTECTION OF LAW THAT YOU HAVE,
"THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT".
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. DO NOT ABOLISH THE ONLY PROTECTION OF LAW THAT YOU HAVE,
"THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACT".
Gordon J Sheppard
No comments:
Post a Comment