CHARLIE
GARD & THE TOTALITARIAN REGIME
In the very sad demise of baby CHARLIE GARD; we now
have the stark vivid incontrovertible proof that, British HUMANKIND, that
create 'life'; have no control or 'jurisdiction' over the 'destiny' of the
'life', that they created. The totalitarian 'REGIME' usurps all that 'right' to
determine their child's destiny; by, imposed and, corrupt legislation; taking
that 'right' away.
Wholly and corruptly and, without any legal
authority whatsoever, the totalitarian "REGIME' assumes that when 'life'
is created and 'born' to the shores of the country; that, it 'OWNS' that LIFE.
Had CHARLIE GARD's body been handed over to his
parents, when they first requested to take him to America, to try a new form of
medical treatment that was on offer; CHARLIE GARD might have survived; and, his
illness, might have been cured.
Absolutely no one today can assert that CHARLIE
GARD might have 'died' or might have ‘lived'; because that 'life saving'
procedure was denied.
The professional medical pique of the hospital
holding CHARLIE GARD, assumed that they had the right to 'own' his body; and,
they refused the parents' wishes in this regard.
There then followed fully six months wrangling in
the 'HIGH COURT'; the British, 'SUPREME COURT OF LAW', and, the, 'EUROPEAN
HUMAN RIGHTS COURT'; which, all finally determined, that CHARLIE GARD was
incurable and that he must die.
How? and Why? should this travesty have taken
place?
Because, all born to the shores of the BRITISH
ISLES are not classified or recognised as, HUMANKIND; with the 'rights' of
HUMANKIND, inherent in the Genes. They, are merely classified, in law, as being
mere, "SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN". Where, they have no 'protection of
law' and no 'rights' at all.
This wicked travesty must now be challenged in law.
Because, this status of being classified as
"SUBJECTS OF THE CROWN' has no true legality at all. It is an 'imposed'
condition that is automatically 'imposed' on every HUMAN BEING, born to these
shores. It binds in law, all so born, to give 'allegiance' to the
"REIGNING MONARCH" for as long as a, MONARCH, shall reign. But,
truthfully, this imposed condition, has no true LEGALITY at all.
No one was ever asked if they wanted to give
'allegiance' to the 'Reigning Monarch'. No one was ever asked if they wanted to
be in 'subjugation' to the Crown. The totalitarian 'REGIME', IMPOSED ALL THAT
STATUS ON EVERYONE, WITHOUT CONSENT.
This 'status' where the CROWN and the JUDICIARY
assumes that the REGIME has the right to determine it owns all HUMANKIND; born
to the shores of Great Britain; derives, solely, from parliament in ages past,
"Swearing allegiance to the King". When, that parliament, in
'swearing the oath', as follows, declared,
"And thereunto the said Lords Spirituall and
Temporall and Commons doe in the Name of all the People aforesaid most humbly
submit themselves their Heires and Posterities for ever and doe faithfully
promise That they will stand to maintaine and defend their said Majesties and
alsoe the Limitation and Succession of the Crowne herein specified and
contained to the utmost of their Powers with their Lives and Estates against
all Persons whatsoever that shall attempt any thing to the contrary."
As, TOM PAINE, the famous author of, "Rights
of Man" says, "MAN HAS NO PROPERTY IN MAN"
One generation of parliament cannot lawfully bind
their POSTERITY, (of another generation), to be bound by the same 'Oath'
that they swear. This has no lawful
validity at all.
Note:
THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE NEVER EVER AGREED TO BE IN
'SUBJUGATION' TO THE CROWN. THE BRITISH PEOPLE HAVE NEVER EVER AGREED TO GIVE
'ALLEGIANCE' TO KING OR QUEEN. THIS TYRANNY IS WHOLLY IMPOSED.
IMPORTANT ALERT:
THE GIVING OF"ALLEGIANCE" IS A TWO-WAY CONDITION
IN RESPECT TO BOTH THE 'GIVING' AND THE 'RECEIVING'. IN RESPECT TO THE 'GIVING'
OF 'ALLEGIANCE' TO THE 'REIGNING MONARCH'; BY LAW, THIS CONDITION APPLIES:
"ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE 'LIEGE LORD' FOR
THE 'PROTECTION' OF THE 'LIEGE LORD'. (THIS, BY 'PRECEDENT OF LAW') IS KNOWN AS
THE,"ORIGINAL CONTRACT".
ELIZABETH THE SECOND throughout all the sixty odd
years she has occupied that throne, has never ever honoured that,
"ORIGINAL CONTRACT". She has consistently and repeatedly failed to
'protect' the British People. Furthermore, she has consistently "Granted
the "ROYAL ASSENT" to corrupt law. All 'Acts' 'Motions' and 'Bills'
created and passed by parliament, UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY
WHIPS, is corrupt law. Because, the 'WHIPS' in parliament, "PREJUDICE THE
PEOPLE". Which is wholly proscribed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF
RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED".
CORRUPTION OF THE JUDICIARY
The British JUDICIARY repeatedly "Conspires to
Pervert the Course of Justice" and deceive the British people, by ruling
that "Article 9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689" is,
"ABSOLUTE", in law.
"Article 9" reads:
"That the Freedome of Speech Debates and
Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any Court
or Place outside of Parlyament"
In consequence of this the Judiciary, determines
and rules that, "Parliament may not be questioned in the Courts",
under any circumstances.
This, is a foul and wicked lie. Calculated to
provide parliament with an untestable and an unchallengeable “SUPREMACY";
where parliament can say or do anything it pleases, without any 'challenge' in
the Courts.
It is a foul and wicked lie; because, in that very
same Bill, there is another paragraph known as, "THE SAID RIGHTS
CLAIMED" which specifically instructs parliament that it may have its
"SUPREMACY" or, it may 'enact' any of the "PREMISES" of the
Bill; but only by carrying out the 'conditions' as set out in, "THE SAID
RIGHTS CLAIMED". And, this specifically instructs parliament that when it
'enacts' any of the "PREMISES" of the Bill; nothing, "OUGHT
PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
There is no doubt whatsoever, that in consideration
of this; the BRITISH JUDICIARY is rotten and corrupt.
CHARLIE GARD
Having now here fully established that the totalitarian
"REGIME" has no legal right whatsoever to the 'legal' ownership of
CHARLIE GARD and his body. And, having now established wholly and completely
that the entire BRITISH JUDICIARY is wholly corrupt.
The JUDICIARY's ruling in respect to CHARLIE GARD,
is undoubtedly corrupt.
1.
When the British "Supreme
Court" declared and determined that, "Parents
have no right to determine treatment". Therefore, ruling that, “CHARLIE GARD MUST DIE”.
This was corrupt. Parents, having 'created that
'life' have more rights than anyone else.
2.
Especially, MORE RIGHTS IN
NATURAL LAW, than any obstructive medical profession and a totalitarian
'REGIME' that has no rights to the 'ownership' of CHARLIE GARD's body, at all.
CONCLUSION
CHARLIE GARD's parents must now start a legal
action in the courts claiming massive financial compensation from the 'medics'
and the 'JUDICIARY'; that, both, through their corruption, obstruction, and
intransigence, purposely delayed the treatment of CHARLIE GARD; and, who then determined,
that CHARLIE GARD, MUST DIE.
The General Public at large 'trying to save’,
CHARLIE GARD, with all good faith and generosity, contributed, as reported,
"ONE MILLION POUNDS" in order to send him to America for treatment.
I respectfully suggest that this huge sum should
now be used by CHARLIE GARD's parents to sue both the 'medics' and the
'JUDICIARY' that were intent on, his death.
DEFEND CHARLIE GARD, GIVE HIM HIS DAY IN COURT.
Gordon J Sheppard.
No comments:
Post a Comment