GOVERNMENT – RUSSIA – AND THE ‘DICTIONARY’….
"HIGHLY LIKELY" - Theresa May.
"MOST LIKELY" - Many Members of Parliament.
"OVERWHELMINGLY LIKELY" - Foreign Secretary, Boris
Johnson.
All, providing the stark vivid evidence that the 'British' who are
governing the country, are behaving like infantile six-year-old little
children who have never seen a 'dictionary'; and, who have no comprehension of
the true meaning of words.
"LIKELY", is not and can never be, CERTAINTY.
(Check out the 'Dictionary').
Yet, Theresa May and her fucking rotten government, and virtually all
the fucking 'right wing' anti-Russian Members of her party in parliament; all
claim they are CERTAIN that RUSSIA is responsible for using "Military
Grade Nerve Agent" poison to murder SERGEI SKRIPIAL and his daughter in
SALISBURY.
This is not the first time this fucking government has made this
'infantile' grave error; not understanding the meaning of words; they have repeatedly
and consistently asserted that, "RUSSIA ANNEXED CRIMEA" - and,
corruptly, they assert, that they are so 'confident' of this, the British
Government actually IMPOSED SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA.
CHECKING OUT THE OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONERY; THE WORD "ANNEX"
OR "ANNEXATION"; IS ACTUALLY DEFINED AS:
"SEIZING TERRITORY BY FORCE"
Russia did not 'seize CRIMEA BY FORCE - RUSSIA secured the 'sovereignty'
of CRIMEA in precisely the same way as the British claim the 'sovereignty' of
the FALKLANDS. By the, INTERNATIONAL CRITERION OF 'SELF DETERMINATION' OF THE
PEOPLE LIVING IN THOSE TERITORIES, themselves.
THE FALKLANDS
The British mounted a referendum, and the people living there voted
as follows:
(a), they declared they were BRITISH; (b), they declared they wished to
remain being BRITISH; and, (c), that they wanted to be governed by
BRITAIN. - This determined in LAW that BRITAIN had the right to govern in
the Falklands; however, it did not provide the BRITISH right to claim the
'ownership' of the, LAND.
CRIMEA
When the fascist gangsters seized the government of UKRAINE and,
threatened the RUSSIAN people living in CRIMEA, a referendum was held in CRIMEA
by those people living there, to determine how they should be governed. In that
referendum all the people living in CRIMEA declared that vote as follows:
(a), they determined that they were, RUSSIAN; (b), they determined that
they wished to remain being, RUSSIAN; (c), they determined that they wanted
their children to be taught RUSSIAN in school; and, (d), that they wanted to be
governed by RUSSIA. They then pleaded with RUSSIA to 'protect' them from the
threat of the gangsters now governing UKRAINE.
THUS, BY THE INTERNATIONAL 'CRITERION' OF 'SELF DETERMINATION' RUSSIA
WAS ABLE TO ASSERT AND CLAIM THE RIGHTFUL SOVEREIGNTY OF CRIMEA.
THE WICKED IMPOSITION OF 'SANCTIONS' AGAINST RUSSIA, BY THE BRITISH FOR
THE 'SPECIFIC ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA', HAD NO VALID LEGALITY AT ALL. RUSSIA
SHOULD NOT ONLY PURSUE THE RECLAMATION OF ALL FINANCIAL LOSS ON ACCOUNT OF
THOSE IMPOSED SANCTIONS; RUSSIA SHOULD CLAIM MASSIVE 'COMPENSATION' AS WELL.
No comments:
Post a Comment