WHO IS MOST LIKE HITLER?

Subject: BORIS JOHNSON asserts PUTIN is just like HITLER....

No! He's got that terribly wrong;

BORIS JOHNSON, THERESA MAY, and all the political parties in Parliament are just like HITLER; LAWS, ACTS, MOTIONS and BILLS are being created and passed in the British Parliament today in precisely the same manner, ‘undemocratically’, as when HITLER and the NAZIS created their own LAW.

 

HITLER, before he came to power and throughout the late 1920’s and early 1930’s, warned the entire world what he would do, when he achieved the power to govern. In speeches throughout Germany, and, even in a Court of Law when he was giving evidence, he stated and proclaimed,

 

“We will use the Democratic process in order to achieve the power to govern, but once we achieve that power, ‘heads will roll’ and we will create our own Law.”

 

The entire World was warned what he would do, but no one took any proper notice.

 

The very instance, when HITLER was appointed Chancellor of Germany, he presented to the ‘Reichstag’ (the German democratic parliament) his “ENABLING LAW” - this ‘Law’ allowed HITLER to be established as the “Supreme Head of State” with the powers to create his own Law. That, democratic parliament, on the 23rd day of March 1933, passed that ‘Law’ by 441 votes for, and only 94 against. So, directly from that very precise moment thereon, all the horrors of the Nazi Regime were accomplished by, “Due process of Law” -  Everything that HITLER and the Nazis did, including all the concentration camp committals, all the executions by hanging shooting or by guillotine, and all the “HOLOCAUST” was all brought about by, “Due process of Law”.

 

HITLER’s “Enabling Law” made it all entirely legal and possible.

 

But, the British “ENABLING PROCESS” has no such “legality” at all.

The political party WHIPS in Parliament instruct Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; this ‘unlawful’ diktat; overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ the ‘CONSTITUENTS’ might have placed upon their Member of Parliament; and, therefore and thereby; this causes the “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”

 

Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” by Parliament, is wholly proscribed by the “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/ in the paragraph/ THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”

 

This paragraph specifically instructs Parliament and all Members of Parliament that Parliament may ‘enact’, “ARTICLE 9”, of that Bill; (that provides parliament with its “SUPREMACY”); or Parliament might ‘enact’ any of the other “PREMISES” of that Bill; but, only upon the conditions set out in the ‘precedent of law’ as established within the paragraph: “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”

 

“THE SAID RIGHT CLAIMED” specifically instructs Parliament that when Parliament ‘enacts’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”

 

Thus, when Parliament creates and passes “LAWS” “ACTS” “MOTIONS” and “BILLS” under the, INFLUENCE OF THE DIKTAT OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS; all that rotten ‘legislation’; has no LEGALITY at all.

 

Who is the most like HITLER now? TUTIN? Or, THERESA MAY and BORIS JOHNSON?

 

HITLER HAD PERFECT LEGALITY.

THERESA MAY AND BORIS JOHNSON – HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.

 

Gordon J Sheppard