BREXIT – Question for
the Attorney General.
Yesterday, (3.12.2018), the Attorney
General, GEOFFREY COX MP, made a profound statement to parliament in which he
said,
“I stand ready willing and able to answer any questions of law in respect
to the “European Withdrawal Bill”
Here is my
question,
Can the
Attorney General produce the actual evidence verifying the true legal validity
for the use in parliament of the, Political Party Whips?
I claim assert
and contend that the “Political Party Whips” and their political party activities
in parliament have no true legal validity at all.
When the
WHIPS instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must vote, this
overrules and supplants all rightful influence that might have been placed upon
those Members, by the Constituents.
This
therefore causes the, “Prejudice of the People”.
Yet, “PREJUDICE
OF THE PEOPLE” is specifically proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out in
the,
“STATUTE IN
FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”
This
paragraph within the Bill of Rights 1689 specifically instructs parliament; and
all reading the Bill; that parliament may have its “SUPREMACY” afforded to
parliament by “Article 9” of the Bill; or, parliament may ‘enact’ any of the
other “PREMISES” of the Bill. But only on the conditions as determined by, “THE
SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” – Which specifically instructs parliament that nothing, “OUGHT
PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
The
Attorney General cannot produce the evidence that somewhere in the history of
parliament, parliament approved the use of the political party WHIPS in
parliament,
Because the
mere proposition could not even be ‘put’ to parliament for a vote; without
causing the, “Prejudice of the People”, and removing the ‘protection’ of the
People, provided by, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.
“THE SAID RIGHTS
CLAIMED” therefore is one “Rule of Law” that is, “Written in Stone”.
It can
never ever be amended or even abolished by parliament, without causing the, “PREJUDICE
OF THE PEOPLE”
No comments:
Post a Comment