TWITTER, again....

TWITTER, the travesty of injustice, prevailing today.

 

In any trial in any Court of Law, the defendant and his legal counsel representing him, will always be provided with all relevant information in respect to the charges, being levelled against him.

Note: (Here, throughout; ‘his’ also is applicable to ‘her’; if the defendant is female.)

The defendant will know and, will have the assurance, that no ‘guilt’ can be established, or any punishment be inflicted, prior to his right to defend himself; before, the Court can take any action against him at all.

 

But, this is not the case; in respect to, TWITTER.

When anyone raises a complaint against the USER of TWITTER;

1. TWITTER provides the complete immunity of the anonymity of the person making the complaint, refusing to advise the 'USER', of the identity of who or why the complaint has been made.

2. TWITTER establishes ‘guilt’ without any trial.

 

3. TWITTER imposes ‘sentence’ automatically against the USER, blocking the account. Without the 'USER' having 'any say in the matter', at all.

4. TWITTER fails to provide the right of reply in order to defend himself, prior to any sentence being imposed.

5. In this travesty of injustice, TWITTER declares to the World, that instead of upholding and protecting the bright jewels of FREE SPEECH, FREE EXPRESSION, and, DEMOCRACY;

6. TWITTER, as a priority prefers, the CENSORSHIP of the, “Totalitarian Regime”.

7. TWITTER does provide an “Appeal” procedure; but, that is wholly useless; because, as the ‘USER’ has not been provided with the precise details of the ‘allegations’ against him; he cannot possibly, submit an ‘Appeal’.

 

Every, USER of TWITTER, should now seriously consider, whether, with, this travesty of injustice taking place consistently today; is it worth subscribing to at all?