BREXIT - URGENT MESSAGE FOR VINCE
CABLE MP; Leader of the Liberal Party.
In respect of ‘BREXIT’; You now
announce that you are going to, ‘REVOKE’ “Article 50”.
Please take note, Sir;
There is no need to revoke “Article 50” because it is already
wholly illegal and unlawful; all that is necessary; is to test and challenge
the, LEGALITY, in the ‘SUPREME COURT”.
Where the JUDICIARY, will be unable
to refute all the contentions and the submissions ‘submitted’ in support of the
claim. As set out here,
Explanation:
“Article 50” of the “EU (Withdrawal) Bill” was
passed in parliament in a “WHIPPED VOTE”. Elected Members of Parliament were
instructed by the ‘WHIPS’, on how they should vote.
This political activity by the ‘WHIPS’
in parliament has no LEGALITY whatsoever.
The ‘WHIPS’ are not entrenched in ‘LAW’.
They are merely the ‘private’
arrangements of the political parties.
There is not one LEGAL INSTRUMENT
anywhere within the entire archive of the United Kingdom, that can prove and
establish the, LEGALITY OF THE ‘WHIPS’, in parliament.
Furthermore, when the ‘WHIPS’
instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote; this,
over-rules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ of the Constituents. WHO
ELECTED THOSE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, in the first place.
This, therefore, causes the, “PREJUDICE
OF THE PEOPLE”.
Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” is
specifically proscribed by the ‘peoples
protection’ afforded by the, “BILL OF RIGHTS 1689”. – In the paragraph of
that Bill known as, “The Said Rights Claimed” – this specifically instructs parliament; that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’
any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, only upon the conditions, that nothing,
“OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
1.
The political party ‘WHIPS’ in
parliament do, “Prejudice the People”
2.
Article 50 passed in parliament by a ‘WHIPPED
VOTE’, has caused, the “Prejudice of the People”
3.
The JUDICIARY OF THE ‘SUPREME COURT’ WILL
FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO REFUTE THIS. Because,
4.
The, “Said Rights Claimed” is the “Supreme Authority” of the entire “BILL
OF RIGHTS 1689”. For, it states within its text that it is the, ‘AUTHORITY’,
over all the “PREMISES”, of the Bill.
5.
The Said Rights Claimed
“And
they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their
undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or
Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought
in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
6.
The, “Said Rights Claimed” even over-rules the “SUPREMACY” of Parliament itself if and whenever parliament; “PREJUDICE
THE PEOPLE”.
7.
The, “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” is the one
‘LAW’ that is, “Written in
Stone”.
8.
It can never be amended or even abolished,
without causing the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”
9.
The mere ‘proposition’ being
presented to parliament for the ‘consent’ of parliament for the use of the ‘WHIPS’;
could not even take place; without causing the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”.
VINCE CABLE, Sir,
I urge you to my read my book “DEMOCRACY”. It is available
here in two formats: Kindle e-book download £1.90; or, Paperback £3.,50.
No comments:
Post a Comment