GordonJ Sheppard
Thu 30/05/2019 16:42
- Helen
Hayes
Dear Helen Hayes MP
LABOUR PARTY must get to grips properly understanding that a “Whipped
Vote” in Parliament has no LEGALITY at all.
1. The WHIPS and their political party ‘activities’ in Parliament are
not entrenched in LAW.
2. They are merely the ‘private arrangements’ of the political parties.
3. There is not one LEGAL DOCUMENT or LEGAL INSTRUMENT in the entire
archive of Great Britain, that verifies and establishes the LEGALITY of the
WHIPS in Parliament.
4. The political party WHIPS in Parliament has no legality at all.
5. Furthermore, when the WHIPS instruct elected Members of Parliament on
how they must or should vote; this overrules and supplants all ‘rightful
influence’ of the Constituents; who elected those Members in the first place.
6. This therefore causes the, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE”
7. Yet, “PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE” by
Parliament is specifically proscribed by the, “STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF
RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.
8. This paragraph within the “BILL OF RIGHTS” provides
the ‘protection of the people’; It specifically instructs Parliament;
that parliament may ‘enact’ or ‘apply’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but only providing, that
nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.
9. The “SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED” is the ‘Supreme
Authority” over everything that is written in the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”.
For, it states within its text; that it is the ‘authority’ over all the “PREMISES”
of the Bill.
CONCLUSION
A. THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT DO “PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”; THEREFORE,
THE “WHIPS” HAS NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.
B. A “WHIPPED VOTE’ PASSED. BY PARLIAMENT; IS ENTIRELY UNLAWFUL; HAVING
NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.
C. IN CONSEQUENCE; THE “BREXIT” TRIGGERING OF “ARTICLE 50” IN THE
“European (Withdrawal) Bill” PASSED BY PARLIAMENT IN A “WHIPPED VOTE” IS WHOLLY
UNLAWFUL; HAVING NO ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.
D. THEREBY, ALL THE NEGOTIATIONS, ALL THE ENORMOUS COST, AND ALL THE
WORK THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE BETWEEN THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND THE EU COMMISSION
IN RESPECT OF GREAT BRITAIN ‘LEAVING’ THE EU; HAS ALL. BEEN WASTED. BECAUSE,
ALL OF IT, HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT, WITHOUT ANY ‘LEGALITY’ AT ALL.
E. TESTING THE LEGALITY OR ILLEGALITY OF THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT CAN
EASILY BE VERIFIED, BY THE MERE SUBMISSION OF THE CASE TO THE BRITISH “SUPREME
COURT” OR, TO THE “EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE”.
Anyone, or, any MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT; that still insist on the LEGALITY
of the WHIPS; They must now establish that ‘insistence’ in these COURTS OF LAW,
Otherwise, the WHIPS in Parliament; must be ABOLISHED at once.
With, BREXIT, “ARTICLE 50” being declared as unlawful.
JEREMY CORBYN
250,000 people voted for JEREMY CORBYN to be the leader of the LABOUR
PARTY. They each voted for him because they were of the opinion that he was to
be ‘trusted’ and that he would LEAD THE LABOUR PARTY. He has not only betrayed
that ‘TRUST’ by not ‘leading’ at all; but, worse than that, he by his own
actions has established he should not be trusted at all. By his own actions he
has proved to be a, HYPOCRITE. Throughout his own political party career in
parliament and in ‘voting’ he has failed to comply with the instructions of the
Labour Party Whips; doing so because he chose to represent those that elected
him in preference to the political party ‘diktat’. He exercised his FREEDOM to
choose.
Yet, the very instant he becomes the leader of the Labour Party; he denies
that same FREEDOM to all elected Members of the Labour Parliamentary Party. He
instructs them all, to comply, with the instructions of the, “WHIPS”
Nothing could be more hypocritical.
BFN Regards, Gordon J Sheppard
The Said Rights Claimed
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The
Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations
Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the
said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or
Example”
No comments:
Post a Comment