BREXIT - QUEEN ABDICATES THE THRONE

BREXIT - HM QUEEN ‘Breaks the Original Contract”; Thereby; She has, ‘Abdicated the Throne’.

Note: Throughout the Queen’s entire reign she has consistently ‘broken this contract’ by granting the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to the corrupt LAWS passed by Parliament.

All, “Acts” “Motions” and “Bills” created and passed in Parliament by the process of a “Whipped Vote”; is wholly corrupt; having no legality whatsoever. When the political party ‘WHIPS’ instruct elected Members of Parliament how they should or must vote; this causes and breaches the ‘protection of the people’ provided by the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

 

But, in considering the extreme plight of the country, and all the People of our country; in respect to the chaos corruption and confusion in respect to BREXIT; HM QUEEN must have been fully aware of this threat; yet she has not ‘lifted a finger’ to intervene.

Doesn’t she know she is obliged by law to “PROTECT THE PEOPLE”;

Doesn’t she know she has the DUTY of honouring both her ‘Coronation Oath’ and the ‘Original Contract’.

 

When the Queen invited BORIS JOHNSON to be Prime Minister and form a Government; she specifically, “Broke the Original Contract” and she “ABDICATED” the throne.

Because, BORIS JOHNSON is a ‘criminal’; “Whilst in public office”, He, “Perverted the Course of Justice”; by ‘lying’ repeatedly during the 2016 EU REFERENDUM campaign.

 

HISTORY

In the year 1688, the CONVENTION (Parliament) removed KING JAMES the Second, from the throne. JAMES II was charged with, “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People”.

In a huge debate known as the “Debate at Large” consisting of both the ‘Commons’ and the ‘House of Lords’, held in the “Painted Chamber” of the ‘Commons’; they debated, “Relating to the Word”,

“ABDICATED” and “THE VACANCY OF THE THRONE”.

 

During this crucial debate, The Speaker, HENRY POWLE, said this,

“It is from those who are upon the Throne of England (when there are any such) from whom the People of England ought to receive Protection; and to whom, for that Cause, they owe the Allegiance of Subjects”.

(But, then continuing in respect of King James II, he went on to say),

“but there being none now from whom they expect ‘Regal Protection”, and to whom, for that Cause, they owe the Allegiance of Subjects; the ‘Commons’ conceive, The Throne is Vacant”.

 

LORD TREBY

In this debate said,

When the 'Reigning Monarch';

 

"Doth violate, not a particular Law; but all the Fundamentals; nor Injure a particular Person in Religion, Liberty, or Property; but falls upon the whole Constitution itself, What doth all this speak?

 

"He therein faith declares, I will no more keep within my limited Authority, nor hold my Kingly Office upon such Terms; This 'title' I had by the Original Contract between King and People; I Renounce that, and will assume another 'Title' to myself; That is, such a Title, as which I may Act as if there was no such Law to Circumscribe my Authority."

 

"It is because the King hath thus violated the Constitution, by which the Law stands, as the Rule both of the Kings Government, and the Peoples Obedience, that we say, He hath Abdicated, and Renounced Government.”

 

EARL OF CLARENDON

Speaking of the ‘Lineal Descent’ in this debate; (all other ‘Reigning Monarch’s’ that would sit upon the throne); declared,

 

“The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the contract he (or she) can also be Deposed”.

 

CONCLUSION

There is no doubt whatsoever that HM QUEEN, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, has “Broken the Original Contract” and her Coronation Oath; thereby she has failed miserably to protect Her Subjects; and therefore, She, ABDICATES THE THRONE.

 

BORIS JOHNSON must now stand trial for “Perverting the Course of Justice” during the EU Referendum of 2016. The ‘lies’ that he told in support of “Leaving the EU” campaign were transmitted world wide by live television reports; and they must have ‘influenced’ the voting in that Referendum. Whether the ‘voter’ voted to ‘LEAVE’ entirely in respect to their own ‘conviction’, ‘motivation’, and ‘Intelligence’; only a COURT OF LAW can decide.

I merely contend, the ‘lie’ was prominently emblazoned on both sides of a large red bus; which was seen ‘world wide’ on transmitted television reports; and this, MUST HAVE INFLUENCED THAT VOTE. It is now up to every ‘lazy’ voter who voted “REMAIN”,

 

To do something positive, at last, in order to challenge this travesty and injustice, using ‘LAW’, in a, “COURT OF LAW”.  

All the silly protest marches in the streets; achieves nothing at all.