CONSTITUTION,
and the, ‘House of Lords’...
What a load of clap-trap is being
broadcast today on TV News programs about the 'Constitution' and the 'House of Lords'; news
broadcasters and, vested interested politicians, all asserting that the 'Lord's'
have no right to go against the 'Constitution' in respect to challenging the
government's Bill for imposing the proposed changes to "TAX CREDITS"
legislation.
"CONSTITUTION" ? there is no 'Written Constitution'; there is no legal "Constitution" at all in Great Britain today; so therefore the 'Constitution' is anything that YOU, or, Myself, or, what anyone else asserts that it is; and, which, no one can 'verify', at all, in, LAW.
But, in respect to the actual legal validity of the "TAX CREDITS" changes that the government is proposing in this Bill; there is a written legal "Statute in Force" as the 'precedent of law', whereby the changes being proposed, HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
The actual Bill proposing these changes was passed by Parliament 'under the influence' of the political party WHIPS; the 'vote' of parliament passing this legislation therefore was dominated and controlled by the political party WHIPS; who instructed Members of Parliament on how they should vote.
The WHIPS, in parliament, instructing Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote, overrules and supplants, all 'rightful influence' that has been placed upon those 'elected', Members of Parliament, by the Constituents; and, this creates, the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
The, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament applies or 'enacts' any of the "PREMISES" of the "Bill of Rights 1689”; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
Therefore, by, 'precedent of law', any law or Bill or any Act passed by Parliament under the influence of the Whips; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
Thus, the "TAX CREDITS" legislation being considered by the 'House of Lords' today cannot be passed, or, be declared to be lawful; because, the legislation, created, under the influence of the WHIPS, is wholly unlawful; flouting and breaching the "Statute in Force/ "The Said Rights Claimed".
"CONSTITUTION" ? there is no 'Written Constitution'; there is no legal "Constitution" at all in Great Britain today; so therefore the 'Constitution' is anything that YOU, or, Myself, or, what anyone else asserts that it is; and, which, no one can 'verify', at all, in, LAW.
But, in respect to the actual legal validity of the "TAX CREDITS" changes that the government is proposing in this Bill; there is a written legal "Statute in Force" as the 'precedent of law', whereby the changes being proposed, HAVE NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
The actual Bill proposing these changes was passed by Parliament 'under the influence' of the political party WHIPS; the 'vote' of parliament passing this legislation therefore was dominated and controlled by the political party WHIPS; who instructed Members of Parliament on how they should vote.
The WHIPS, in parliament, instructing Members of Parliament on how they must or should vote, overrules and supplants, all 'rightful influence' that has been placed upon those 'elected', Members of Parliament, by the Constituents; and, this creates, the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
The, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed" specifically instructs Parliament, that when Parliament applies or 'enacts' any of the "PREMISES" of the "Bill of Rights 1689”; that, nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
Therefore, by, 'precedent of law', any law or Bill or any Act passed by Parliament under the influence of the Whips; HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
Thus, the "TAX CREDITS" legislation being considered by the 'House of Lords' today cannot be passed, or, be declared to be lawful; because, the legislation, created, under the influence of the WHIPS, is wholly unlawful; flouting and breaching the "Statute in Force/ "The Said Rights Claimed".
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And
they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular
The
Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that
noe
Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice
of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in
any
wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
All
explained in my book "DEMOCRACY" available here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
No comments:
Post a Comment