Erskine May on the "Privilege of
Parliament”
Government and Members of Parliament
uphold “Erskine May” as the priority “Bible” of Parliament. In respect of,
‘anything in parliament’, parliamentarians always refer to and quote, Erskine
May. Well, in respect to the “Privilege” and the claimed “Supremacy of
Parliament”; this is what “Erskine May” says:
A TREATISE
UPON THE
LAW, PRIVILEGES,
PROCEEDINGS
AND USAGE
OF
PARLIAMENT
By, THOMAS ERSKINE
MAY
Barrister at Law
Assistant Librarian
of the
House of Commons
CHAPTER VI
Jurisdiction of Courts of Law in Matters of
Privilege.
" It has been shown already, that each
house of Parliament claims to be the sole and exclusive judge of its own
privileges, and that the courts have repeatedly acknowledged the right of both
houses to declare what is a breach of privilege, and to commit the parties
offending, as for a contempt. But, although the courts will neither interfere
with Parliament in its punishment of offenders, nor assume the general right of
declaring and limiting the privileges of Parliament, they are bound to
administer the law of the land, and to adjudicate when breaches of that law are
complained of. The jurisdiction of Parliament and the jurisdiction of the
courts are thus liable to be brought into conflict."
Note:
Therefore, if the 'law of the land' as determined by the, "Bill of Rights 1689" determines that if Parliament
creates the "Prejudice of the
People" then, "Article 9" of that Bill becomes null and
void. When, and if, parliament does 'prejudice the people. Then, and, therefore,
in such circumstance, the Judiciary and the courts are bound by 'law' (and, by
“Erskine May”) to hear that case.
But, the British Judiciary, constantly
‘conspiring to pervert the course of justice’, continually determines and
rules, that “Article 9” prevents all challenge in the courts, irrespective of
circumstance.
The
Political Party ‘WHIPS’ in Parliament.
Every week in parliament the ‘WHIPS’ instruct
‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; issuing a
document to them; ordering them to comply. This, is a wholly ‘unlawful’
activity; because, it overrules, overrides, and supplants all ‘rightful
influence’ that might have been placed upon those ‘Members of Parliament’, by
the Constituents. This, therefore creates, the, “Prejudice of the People”. And, this is wholly proscribed by the, ‘precedent of law’ set out in the,
“Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular the Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
CONCLUSION
There can be no doubt whatsoever that
according to ‘LAW’; the political party ‘WHIPS’ in parliament has no legality
at all.
There can be no doubt whatsoever that the, “Said Rights Claimed” is legitimate and valid, ‘LAW’.
There
can be no doubt whatsoever that “Erskine May” determines that the Judiciary,
therefore, must be “bound to administer the law of the land, and to adjudicate
when breaches of that law are complained of.”
It is now up to the British People to demand
of the Judiciary that they investigate and examine and ‘test the legal validity’
of the political party WHIPS and their political party activities, in
parliament.
We must force the Judiciary to hear this
case. Their refusal to do so, will verify without a shadow of doubt, that the
Judiciary are fearful that they would be unable to continue to support their
all previous ruling in respect to “Article 9”, and, do not want a ‘public hearing’
of that case. If this ‘test’ of parliament is not heard in the courts; this
will prove conclusively that the political party ‘WHIPS’ in parliament, has no legality at all.
Here is our chance to create a, TRUE DEMOCRACY. We must not lose this chance.
Gordon
J Sheppard
No comments:
Post a Comment