Corrupt ‘Bills’ and ‘Motions’ created and passed by our “Totalitarian”
Government and Parliament today.
HS2 High Speed Train Bill,
Vast massive expenditure has
already been spent on the preparatory work for the HS2 proposal and project;
yet the BILL as yet has not even been passed by parliament nor has it been
granted the, "ROYAL ASSENT".
Accordingly, now, today, right at this very moment; the "HS2 Bill" is not, 'LAW'
That being so; and, the EVIDENCE proves that this is the case; not a penny should have been spent until the Bill actually becomes 'LAW'. So, from where does the government get the legal authority to spend this huge sum of money; without the Bill being passed as, "LAW'?
Accordingly, now, today, right at this very moment; the "HS2 Bill" is not, 'LAW'
That being so; and, the EVIDENCE proves that this is the case; not a penny should have been spent until the Bill actually becomes 'LAW'. So, from where does the government get the legal authority to spend this huge sum of money; without the Bill being passed as, "LAW'?
No work at all should have
been commenced on this project until parliament of both the, COMMONS &
LORDS, had passed the Bill. And, the Queen had granted the, “ROYAL ASSENT”.
The "Second Reading" of this HS2 Bill took place in parliament on the 25th April 2014; it was passed under a "Whipped Vote" by 452 votes to 41. But, that "Whipped Vote" had no true legal validity at all. Because, the political party WHIPS in parliament instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; overrules and supplants all rightful influence placed upon those Members, by the constituents; and, this therefore creates the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" - Which is wholly proscribed and outlawed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"
The "Second Reading" of this HS2 Bill took place in parliament on the 25th April 2014; it was passed under a "Whipped Vote" by 452 votes to 41. But, that "Whipped Vote" had no true legal validity at all. Because, the political party WHIPS in parliament instructing 'elected' Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; overrules and supplants all rightful influence placed upon those Members, by the constituents; and, this therefore creates the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" - Which is wholly proscribed and outlawed by the, "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"
The Said Rights Claimed
'And they doe Claime Demand and Insist upon all and
singular the Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe
Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People
in any of the said Premisses ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter into
Consequence or Example.'
The House of Lords has not even passed the Bill yet; therefore, it has not yet arrived at HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN's desk for consideration of the granting of the, ROYAL ASSENT.
Furthermore,
in the event that the, 'Present Bill', does arrive at the Queen’s in-tray at
her desk in its present form; HER MAJESTY, by ‘precedent of law’, is bound to
honour the "Original Contract" requiring, the 'protection' of Her
Subjects; therefore, she cannot possibly grant the "ROYAL ASSENT", to
corrupt 'LAW'.
The
'present' HS2 Bill passed by parliament under the influence of the political
party WHIPS, is corrupt 'LAW'; and,
in respect to "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED"; there is no one who can deny
its legal validity. Therefore, in order to establish 'legality' or not for the
Bill; there is only one way to resolve the matter. There must be a proper test
and examination of “Article 9”; the entire “Bill of Rights 1689”; and, the
political party activities in parliament; all carried out in a Court of Law, to
determine legality or not.
This
will place the corrupt Judiciary; who have always "Conspired to pervert the course of Justice" and, deceive
the British people by ruling that, "Article 9" of that Bill prevents
all challenge to parliament in the courts; in a very serious plight indeed;
because, the Judiciary has ALWAYS ruled and determined that, "Article
9" is absolute thereby, preventing all challenge to parliament in the
courts; irrespective of any circumstances.
But,
here in this very instance; in order to test and examine the legal validity of
the WHIPS in parliament; the Judiciary will have to suspend all previous ruling
in respect to "Article 9"; and, actually hear the case. The Judiciary
will be bound to do this, being bound by the ruling and the declaration of,
ERSKINE MAY.
A TREATISE
UPON THE
LAW, PRIVILEGES, PROCEEDINGS
AND USAGE
OF
PARLIAMENT
By, THOMAS ERSKINE MAY
Barrister at Law
Assistant Librarian of the
House of Commons
CHAPTER VI
Jurisdiction of Courts of
Law in Matters of Privilege.
" It has been
shown already, that each house of Parliament claims to be the sole and
exclusive judge of its own privileges, and that the courts have repeatedly
acknowledged the right of both houses to declare what is a breach of privilege,
and to commit the parties offending, as for a contempt. But, although the
courts will neither interfere with Parliament in its punishment of offenders,
nor assume the general right of declaring and limiting the privileges of
Parliament, they are bound to administer the law of the land, and to adjudicate
when breaches of that law are complained of. The jurisdiction of Parliament and
the jurisdiction of the courts are thus liable to be brought into
conflict."
-----------------------------------
Housing and Planning Act 2016
In spite of
all the protests to this Bill by Trades Unions, Local Authorities, and the
massive public demonstrations in London; on the 11th May 2016
parliament passed this Bill; 292 voting for the Bill, 197 against. Yet, again under the unlawful influence of the WHIPS.
The, very
next day, just a few hours thereafter, on the 12th May, Her Majesty
the Queen, granted the “ROYAL ASSENT”. The, sheer blatant indication that Queen
Elizabeth the Second, had not, even looked at the Bill; had not, looked to see
how it was created and that it was free of corruption; had not, even looked at
all of the protests that had taken place; she just ignored her duty and her
responsibility to protect ‘Her Subjects’; she just granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’;
just like any ‘village-postmistress’ framing and rubber-stamping every piece of
paper laid before her by parliament. This Bill had been created and passed
under the influence of the WHIPS; thereby it had no ‘legality’ at all.
ELIZABETH
THE SECOND, granted the ROYAL ASSENT, to,
corrupt, ‘LAW’.
---------------------------------------------
UK Nuclear Deterrent, MOTION.
On the 18th
July 2016 parliament passed this ‘MOTION’ by the vote of 472 votes for; and
only 117 votes against; but, again, it was a “Whipped Vote” having no true
‘legality’ at all.
This
‘MOTION’ before parliament, (Not a ‘Bill’), called upon parliament to approve
the Governments right to spend the horrendous massive expenditure of in excess
of, ‘160 Billion Pounds’; in order to
build four new nuclear submarines and renew the “TRIDENT NUCLEAR MISSILE”
system. And, this ‘Motion’, on being passed, was not going to be subjected to
the usual full ‘scrutiny’ of parliament; whereby, during its readings and
passage through both Houses of Parliament, “The People” would have had the
rightful opportunity to influence their ‘’elected’ parliamentary representative.
Being a ‘MOTION’ it does not get this detailed ‘scrutiny’ of parliament;
neither does it require, the, ‘ROYAL ASSENT’.
This ‘MOTION’ will have
been created, and has been passed by a ‘corrupt’ parliament, passing a
‘corrupt’ Bill; and, “The People” will have had no ‘participation’ at all.
LAWS, BILLS and MOTIONS
being created and passed by parliament today are being created as ‘LAW’; in exactly the same
‘undemocratic’ manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS, created their own laws.
I am sick and tired of
living in this ‘totalitarian regime’ where there is no democracy or protection
of law at all. The political party WHIPS in parliament has no legality
whatsoever. I want the WHIPS wholly abolished; I want a, TRUE DEMOCRACY.
Read my book “DEMOCRACY”;
its very cheap here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
You do not even have to purchase the book to have a look at it;
just activate this link above, then get a ‘sample’ or just ‘look inside’ the
book. Both options are available on the AMAZON website.
No comments:
Post a Comment