BREXIT - boarding the bus..

BREXIT – The, “SPECIFIC DESTINATION” required;

And, boarding the bus….

 

Here's something for everyone to think about re bloody BREXIT and our proposed 'leaving the E.U.

For three days eleven Supreme Court Judges and a learned counsel representing the government have been arguing the case as to who should trigger Article 50 and negotiate the leaving of the EU. (THERESA MAY or PARLIAMENT?). For three days’ all ears, have been assailed with sheer drivel, whilst all these bastards, present in that court, submit and consider the historical legal 'precedents' of cases that have been heard in the courts many years before.

So, obsessed with this silly 'game of law' that these bastards, (the profession of law), always play; they have completely forgot or ignored what the case is all about.

Today, I have also been listening to and viewing the debate, "THE GOVERNMENT PLANS FOR EXITING THE E.U." in parliament. Arguments for and against and back and forth, have been raging in this debate all afternoon.

ALL THIS SHEER WASTE OF TIME AND RESOURCES; When I can resolve the crux of this matter in mere seconds. Take note of this:

PUTTING AN "X' in a tick-box marked "LEAVE" on a ballot paper; only declared your ‘INTENT’ to leave. It proves and it validates, in law, the DESTINATION where you intend to go from thereon.

BUT NO ONE GETS ON A BUS OR A TRAIN TO GO TO A SPECIFIC DESTINATION,

IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHERE THE FUCKING BUS IS GOING.

IF THERE ARE NO 'DESTINATION' BOARDS SHOWN ON THE BUS WHEN IT COMES ALONG. BEFORE YOU GET ON, YOU MUST ASK.

This is exactly what all those who oppose THERESA MAY having the sole and exclusive right to dominate and control our 'destiny'; are asking.

WE WANT TO KNOW WHERE THE FUCKING BUS IS GOING, BEFORE WE GET ON. But, when government won't say where this bus is going,

THEN WE SHOULD NOT 'GET ON'...

This is the lesson that all “The People” of this country must learn; If, I can speedily come up with this conclusion in mere minutes; then why is it fucking necessary to have this ‘time wasting’ four-day sitting of the Supreme Court? And, a five-hour debate in Parliament? And, still not resolve the matter?

And, why aren't "THE PEOPLE" creating "Merry Hell" ?

 

If this JUDICIARY and ‘Profession of Law’ are so intent and obsessed with “Precedent of Law” then I will provide them with the greatest ‘precedent of law’ overruling and surpassing all other ‘precedents of law’ that they have referred to in this present hearing in the “Supreme Court”;

“The Glorious Revolution”;

The, origin of the “Bill of Rights 1689”;

And, the paragraph within that ‘Bill’ known as, “The Said Rights Claimed”

THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED specifically instructs parliament that it is the ‘Supreme Authority’ of the Bill by inserting within its text that it has the authority over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill; and it specifically instructs parliament that when parliament enacts any of the “Premises” of the Bill that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

That’s the over all ‘precedent of law’ that the “Supreme Court” ought to be considering today.
 

"NOTHING OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE"

 
There is also another very valid point that this court should consider:

IF THERESA MAY AND HER ‘TORY’ GOVERNMENT is going to be permitted, in law, to have the sole and exclusive right to trigger ‘Article 50’ and negotiate the terms of leaving the E.U. and, wholly ignore and prevent PARLIAMENT from having a say in the matter; she will be exercising the very same ‘totalitarian diktat’ that enabled ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS with their right to create their own laws. HITLER had the perfect legality to do this; because, he had placed his “Enabling Act” before the German Reichstag (Parliament) for that consent. That, ‘democratic’ parliament passed that ‘Act’ into law 441 votes to 94. And, by doing so, DEMOCRACY, in Germany came to its end. This was the actual birth of the, GERMAN THIRD REICH. So, HITLER did ask parliament for that consent. But, THERESA MAY and her ‘Tory’ government here, are wholly intent on depriving PARLIAMENT from having any say in the matter at all. She, ‘wants to create her own law’ without any ‘consent’ at all.

Read and sign this petition: https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

And, read my book "DEMOCRACY" - it provides a guide for the British people on how to properly participate. The book is cheaply available in two formats: a Kindle e-book for download or a paperback and it can be purchased here:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984