BREXIT: The E.U. TREATY and the “Ultimate Criterion” in order to leave…..

 

In this massive hysteria prevailing throughout Great Britain today in respect of whether THERESA MAY and her (unelected) government should have the sole and exclusive right to 'trigger Article 50' and negotiate all the terms for withdrawal; or, whether PARLIAMENT (Representing, "All the People"), should be involved?

 

Absolutely everyone, the Judiciary, the profession of law, Government, Parliament, and even the National Press, have all completely forgotten or purposely ignored, all about the, 'ultimate criterion', applicable here:

 

WHO, OWNS THE BLOODY TREATY?

WHO, ACTUALLY, OWNS THE, E.U. TREATY?

 

GOVERNMENT DOES NOT OWN THIS TREATY;

THE BRITISH PEOPLE DO.

 

The British people, in another referendum, decided and determined that they wanted to 'Join the E.U.' The government of the day merely 'signed’ the document to join; on behalf of all the people. So, the, E.U. TREATY, is the "PEOPLE's TREATY".

 

Furthermore, at the very instant, that the government of that day ‘signed’ the Treaty; right at that very instant, all the People of Great Britain became "Euro Citizens" and, they were, and are even now, wholly protected by European Law, the European Human Rights Court, and, European Human Rights Law.

 

The British people, by the, BREXIT, referendum, has now voted and determined they want to 'leave' the E.U. But, that vote result only determined the INTENT to leave.

 

IT DID NOT AUTHORISE IN ANY WAY, ANY ACTION REQUIRED AT ALL, IN ORDER, TO LEAVE THE E.U.

 

Nor, in any way, did it remove, abolish, or even demean the existing: British People's E.U. 'protection'; guaranteed, under European, LAW; of both the European Human Rights Court and, European Human Rights  Law.

 

This 'protection' is legally still valid and in force until the very moment Great Britain, actually, ‘LEAVES’, the E.U.

Until then, myself, and everyone in the country, is entitled to demand that the "European Human Rights Court" provides our 'protection' in respect of all the procedures and negotiations that will be necessary; to withdraw from the E.U. And, that, "TREATY."

 

The "European Human Rights Court" must immediately intervene to protect 'BRITISH E.U. CITIZENS' from being abused. This court must immediately rule and declare that the procedure for 'triggering' Article 50 and negotiating the terms of withdrawing from the E.U. must take into account the rightful 'human rights' interests of all the BRITISH E.U. CITIZENS, living today in the U,K. Because, under those 'negotiations' and the possible 'outcome', their legal status will radically change. Whereas, such 'radical change' under, E.U. Current Law, is wholly unlawful; until Great Britain has actually left the E.U.

 

UNTIL GREAT BRITAIN HAS ACTUALLY LEFT THE E.U. THE  BRITISH EURO CITIZENS ARE PROTECTED BY EUROPEAN LAW AS GUARANTEED BY THE E.U. TREATY.

 

Accordingly, the European Human Rights Court must ensure that during the withdrawal 'negotiating' procedures taking place, that "BRITISH EURO CITIZENS" human rights, are protected during those procedures; and, the court must rule that the only way that this can be done; is to order that the 'negotiations' and all of the procedures necessary in order to withdraw from the E.U.; must be controlled through, THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT.

 

This 'protection' cannot be guaranteed if THERESA MAY and her vested interested TORY government has the sole and exclusive right to control these necessary procedures.

 

THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT IN PROTECTING BRITISH EURO 'CITIZENS'; DURING THESE WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURES; MUST ENSURE, THAT ONLY 'PARLIAMENT' IS AUTHORISED TO TRIGGER ARTICLE 50 AND NEGOTIATE THE LEAVING OF THE E.U.

 

All this is most important because the British people have no protection of law whatsoever; there is no access to a 'Written Constitution"; or, a proper, "Bill of Rights; or access to a "Supreme Court" where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuse' of parliament; in the courts. Furthermore, although there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the English throne who is charged by the duty of honouring the "Original Contract"; requiring the protection of the People; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, provides no protection at all.

 

The only protection of LAW that the British people has or had, is the EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT and EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.

For further info in respect of all of the above see this:http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/theresa-may-cant-sleep.html