GENERAL ELECTION
Before it is too late; before YOU
vote in this election; EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE, before your eyes.
THERESA MAY, throughout her election
campaign; she has continually and consistently used the phrase; “COMING
TOGETHER”. Pleading with all present to ‘join with her ‘coming together’ to
create and establish a better government for the country.
NOTE:
“COMING TOGETHER” with THERESA MAY;
would be like ‘cuddling up’ to the very dangerous pulsating coils of an Amazon
‘Boa Constrictor’, which is within seconds, of squeezing all ‘life’ from your
body.
If, YOU, “Cuddle up” and “Come
together” with THERESA MAY? She will ‘squeeze’ every vestige of DEMOCRACY, from
the country, and, from your life.
EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE
Test the ‘evidence’ for yourself; by asking
the questions posed; and, digesting the information provided here:
THERESA MAY, DO YOU BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY?
After she has obviously replied "YES" or
whatever other 'affirmative' she might use. Then challenge her with this:
THEN WHY CANNOT YOU RELY ON "DEMOCRACY" IN ORDER TO GET LEGISLATION
PASSED BY PARLIAMENT?
WHY CANNOT YOU RELY ON THE "FREE VOTE" OF PARLIAMENT IN ORDER
TO PASS 'ACTS' 'MOTIONS' AND 'BILLS' IN PARLIAMENT?
WHY MUST YOU USE THE 'POLITICAL
PARTY WHIPS' TO INSTRUCT MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY MUST VOTE?
INFORMATION: THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL IN
DETERMINING IF, THERESA MAY, IS ELIGIBLE TO GOVERN THE COUNTRY.
To this QUESTION, she can offer no explanation at
all.
Because, the 'political party' WHIPS in parliament,
has no legality at all.
EXPLANATION:
1.
When the political party WHIPS instruct Members of Parliament on how
they should or must vote in respect of all legislation being presented to
parliament for the vote.
2.
The WHIPS, in doing this, overrule and supplant all 'rightful influence'
that might have been placed upon those 'elected' Members of Parliament, by the
constituents.
3.
This, therefore, creates, the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE"
4.
Yet, the "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" by parliament, is
specifically outlawed and proscribed by the precedent of law set out in,
5.
"THE STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS
CLAIMED".
6.
This paragraph, of that Bill, specifically instructs parliament that,
parliament may 'enact' any of the "PREMISES" of that Bill, but, only
upon the conditions as set out in the paragraph, "The Said Rights
Claimed"; which specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament
'enacts' any of the "Premises" of that Bill, that, nothing,
"OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
THE POLITICAL PARTY 'WHIPS' IN PARLIAMENT DO
"PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE" - THEREFORE, THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT - HAS NO
LEGALITY AT ALL.
Here is the 'EVIDENCE' for this, here is that
paragraph in that Bill,
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and
Insist upon all and singular
The Premises as their undoubted
Rights and Liberties and that
noe Declarations Judgements
Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any
of the said Premises, ought in
any wise to be drawne
hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
NOTE:
The BRITISH JUDICIARY DETERMINES AND RULES THAT "PARLIAMENT CANNOT BE QUESTIONED IN
THE COURTS";
And, in a complete, "Conspiracy to pervert the
course of Justice", deceives the British People by ruling that "Article
9" of the "Bill of Rights 1689" provides the legality
for that denial. Ruling, that "Article 9" in 'LAW', is,
"ABSOLUTE".
This is a complete and utter 'FABRICATION'
because, "Article 9" is not 'absolute' at all; it is
wholly 'conditional' and entirely dependent upon the conditions set out in the
‘precedent’ of law of, "The Said Rights Claimed". "Article
9", is merely one of the 13 "Articles" set out
in the Bill; but, "The Said Rights Claimed" has the overall
'authority' of the entire Bill. Because, it states within it's text, that
it has the 'legal authority' over all other "PREMISES" of
the Bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment