THE 'ROYAL ASSENT' AND THE LIES TOLD.....

PARLIAMENT, THE QUEEN, AND, THE WICKED LIES TOLD…..

 

JUNE 26, 2018

Today the ‘Speaker’ of the House of Commons, JOHN BERCOW MP,

Proudly declared in parliament that,

 

 ‘’The Queen has now granted the ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ to the ‘E.U. WITHDRAWAL BILL’’.

He then asserted that, “this now made it possible for E.U. Law to be translated into British LAW.”

 

Then, dutifully, the entire British Media reported and upheld, the wicked, LIE.

 

THE ‘QUEEN’ HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE GRANTING OF THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ – VERY MANY YEARS AGO THE ‘MONARCHY’ ABANDONED ITS DUTY TO HONOUR THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’; REQUIRING THE PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE; AND, USING THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ AS THE ‘’LEGAL INSTRUMENT’’, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE.

THE ‘MONARCHY’ OF ITS OWN VOLITION, SETTLED INSTEAD, TO ENJOY ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF MONARCHY BUT, TO GIVE UP ITS ROLE AND POWER OF ‘ABSOLUTE’ RULE. THE MONARCHY AGREED TO ACCEPT THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY A CORRUPT CONSPIRACY WITH PARLIAMENT, TO SUBMIT TO THE FAR LESSER ROLE OF, ‘’CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCY’’, WHERE THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ HAD NO POWERS AT ALL.

 

TODAY, THE QUEEN HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ‘’ROYAL ASSENT’ AT ALL; IT IS NOW ‘AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED’ BY THE DESPOTS AND DESPOTISM THAT NOW DOMINATES AND CONTROLS THE MONARCHY. THE QUEEN, AS THE, ‘REIGNING MONARCH’, HAS NO POWER AT ALL. HMQ QUEEN ELIZABETH IS MERELY A ‘PUPPET’ WITH THE DESPOTS AND DESPOTISM; NOW PULLING THE STRINGS.

TODAY, THIS DESPOTISM AND THESE DESPOTS DOMINATES AND CONTROLS EVERYTHING THE MONARCHY DOES. THEY HAVE EVEN REMOVED THE, ‘’PROTECTION OF THE PEOPLE’’ REQUIRED BY THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’ – WHEREBY THE PEOPLE NOW – HAVE NO PROTECTION AT ALL.

 

EVERY ‘REIGNING MONARCH’’ SITTING UPON THE ENGLISH THRONE IS REQUIRED BY ‘PRECEDENT OF LAW’ TO HONOUR THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’. THIS CONTRACT, ALTHOUGH UNWRITTEN, IS FULLY ESTABLISHED IN ENGLISH LAW; IT DERIVES FROM THE CONCEPT ESTABLISHED IN ‘OLDE ENGLISH LAW’ THAT, ‘’ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE LIEGE LORD, FOR THE PROTECTION, OF THE LIEGE LORD’’; AND, IT REQUIRES THAT, THE ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ SHALL ACT AS ‘HEAD OF GOVERNMENT’ AND MONITOR PARLIAMENT, IN THE INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE. ENSURING, THAT THE ‘BILLS’ AND ‘LAWS’ CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT, ARE NOT CORRUPT.

 

IRRESPECTIVE OF ‘’CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY’’ EVERY ‘REIGNING MONARCH’ SITTING UPON THE THRONE OF ENGLAND; IS REQUIRED TO HONOUR AND COMPLY WITH THE ‘’ORIGINAL CONTRACT’’.

FAILURE TO HONOUR THAT CONTRACT – ABDICATES THE THRONE.

KING JAMES II WAS REMOVED FROM THE THRONE FOR, ‘’BREAKING THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT BETWIXT KING AND PEOPLE’’.

WHEN THE ‘CONVENTION’ (PARLIAMENT) OF 1688 REMOVED HIM FROM THE THRONE THEY HELD A MASSIVE DEBATE IN THE PAINTED CHAMBER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS BETWEEN BOTH LORDS AND COMMONS TO DETERMINE THE WORDS ‘’ABDICATED’ AND ‘THE THRONE IS VACANT’ – and it was resolved that KING JAMES II had indeed abdicated the Throne. THE CONVENTION DECLARED: ‘’THE THRONE WAS VACANT”

The Speaker of that CONVENTION and debate, HENRY POWLE, said this: ‘’It is upon those on the throne of England that the People look to for their protection, and to whom for which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, but there being none now that the People can look to for that Regal protection, and to which Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the Commons conceive, The Throne is Vacant.’’

 

The, ‘’Earl of Clarendon’’ in that debate also declared: ‘’The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed, if the Successor breaks the Contract, they too can be Deposed.’’

 

ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not ‘once’ honored that Contract during all the years she has occupied that throne. According to the LAW established by the CONVENTION (PARLIAMENT); She has repeatedly, by failing to honor that Contract, and, failing to protect ‘Her Subjects’ she has ‘Abdicated’ the throne.

 

Every ‘Act’ ‘Motion’ or ‘Bill’ created and passed by parliament – under the influence of the political party WHIPS – is ‘corrupt’ and therefore wholly unlawful. The WHIPS in instructing elected Members of Parliament as to how they should ‘vote’, overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members of Parliament by the Constituents. This therefore causes and creates the ‘PREJUDICE’ of the People.

YET,

PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY THE PRECEDENT OF LAW, AS DETERMINED BY THE, ‘STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED’.

Which specifically instructs parliament – and, anyone else reading the Bill – that parliament may have its ‘SUPREMACY’ afforded to parliament by ‘Article 9” of the Bill; or, parliament may ‘enact’ any of the other ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; but only upon the conditions set out in ‘THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED’. This, specifically instructs parliament, that when parliament ‘enacts’ any of the ‘PREMISES’ of the Bill; Nothing, ‘OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE’.

 

THUS, EVERY ‘ACT’ ‘MOTION’ AND ‘BILL’ CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT – UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS – IN RECENT YEARS – IS WHOLLY ‘CORRUPT’.

 

FOR MANY YEARS THE DESPOTS OF MONARCHY HAVE BEEN REPEATEDLY AUTOMATICALLY ‘IMPOSING’ THE ‘ROYAL ASSENT’ TO CORRUPT LAW.

THE, ‘EU WITHDRAWAL BILL’, IN ALL OF ITS STAGES, THRU PARLIAMENT, WAS PASSED UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THE WHIPS; IN EVERY STAGE; THEREFORE, THIS ‘BILL’ NOW, HAS NO LAWFUL LEGALITY AT ALL. THE ‘EU WITHDRAWAL BILL’ IN ALL ITS ENTIREITY MUST BE PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT AGAIN; BUT, THIS TIME, IT MUST BE PASSED BY A ‘FREE VOTE’.