GET RID OF THE ROTTEN CORRUPT JUDICIARY

BRITISH JUDICIARY ARE CORRUPT.

Its time to get rid of the fucking lot of them; they lie, cheat, manipulate, and deceive, all of the time.

 

The, JUDICIARY, arrogantly perform and act in sheer contempt of the ‘common’ people of our country; they constantly assert and assume that they are, “LAW”.

They are not, “LAW” – they are merely the fucking ‘SERVANTS” OF LAW.

 

WE, who voluntarily consent to live by “LAW”; are the, “LAW”. It is as, LORD HAILSHAM, (An ex Lord Chancellor of England) said,

 

“Law is a Myth, without the consent of the people, there is no Law”

Thus,

WE, that consent to live by the, “RULE OF LAW”, are the LAW - The BRITISH JUDICIARY - corrupt that, LAW - every day.

EVIDENCE OF THE CORRUPTION

The BRITISH JUDICARY lie and “Conspire to Pervert the Course of Justice” and, deceive the British people, by ruling that parliament may not be “QUESTIONED” in the Courts. The rotten and corrupt JUDICIARY, for this ruling and, assertion, wholly relies upon, “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”; which they assert, prevents by law, the QUESTIONING of parliament in the Courts.

The JUDICIARY asserts and claims, that “Article 9” is, “ABSOLUTE”; thereby, preventing the ‘questioning’ of parliament, in the Courts, irrespective of any circumstance.

 

NOTE: Now, consider this: the disgusting cowardly corrupt role of the, BRITISH PROFESSION OF LAW; not one of these cowardly bastards; Lawyers and Barristers, with all their ridiculous ‘wigs and gowns’, has ever had the courage; to challenge this corrupt ruling of the JUDICIARY. Just like that profession, in Germany; when, HITLER, secured his right, to create his own law; they, did nothing then and, kept very quiet. Just as, our corrupt, ‘Profession of Law’, is doing today.

 

Anyone, with two eyes and a brain, reading the “Bill of Rights 1689” properly and entirely; can determine in an instant, that this “RULING OF THE JUDICIARY” is wholly untrue, and corrupt. “ARTICLE 9” of that Bill, is not, “ABSOLUTE”.

It, like all the other “PREMISES” of that Bill; are wholly dependent upon the conditions as specified set out in the paragraph, “THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED”.

This paragraph of the Bill specifically instructs parliament; and, anyone else reading the Bill; that parliament may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES” of the Bill; but, only upon the conditions that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”. 



  The, “Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example 

Thereby establishing in, LAW, that anyone and everyone has the right to “QUESTION” parliament in the Courts; if and whenever, parliament, PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”. 

THE ENTIRE PRESENT BRITISH JUDICIARY ARE FUCKING LIARS AND DECEIVERS AND, THEY ARE WHOLLY CORRUPT; EVERY FUCKING ONE OF THEM, MUST NOW GO.

WE, MUST SET UP A COMPLETELY NEW AND FRESH JUDICIARY; THAT WILL PROPERLY RECOGNIZE THE TRUE, “RULE OF LAW”.

 

In, subscribing, ‘voluntarily’, consenting to live by “LAW” and the “RULE OF LAW’ – in preference to, “Anarchy” - all so ‘consenting’ are entitled to ‘specific’ criterion to satisfy that consent:

All, “LAW” created, must conform to,

TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, INTELLIGENCE, LOGIC and RATIONALE.

Any, “LAW” thus created, that does not conform to this criterion; is not ‘valid’ law, at all; it is merely the imposed ‘diktat’ of the, TOTALITARIAN REGIME.

 

All, ‘consenting’ to “Live” by “The Rule of Law”; are entitled to the ‘rights’ to,

 

1.  Participate in the framing of LAW.

2.  Be entitled to ‘equality’ within LAW.

3.  Be provided, the full “protection’ of LAW.

 ALL THREE OF THESE ‘RIGHTS’ ARE DENIED TO THE BRITISH TODAY.

 

FURTHER EVIDENCE VERIFYING THE CORRUPTION OF THE JUDICIARY AND WHY THEY SHOULD BE ‘GIVEN THE BOOT’

 

Just two further instances of their arrogance and their corruption.

 

1.  The Judge refused to allow a woman’s DIVORCE, even, when that woman had asserted; that she was no longer happy in the marriage; and wanted to be free to live her ‘life’ again.

This ruling by this corrupt JUDGE, to refuse her DIVORCE; had nothing whatsoever to do with LAW. It was merely the ‘whim’ or the ‘biased opinion’ of the, JUDGE. It wholly flouted and breached the required criterion for LAW, TRUTH, FREEDOM, JUSTICE, INTELLIGENCE, LOGIC and RATIONALE. If the woman has declared that she is now unhappy in the marriage, all, LOGIC, verifies; she is entitled to the, DIVORCE.

 

2.  In, the Judgment of the JUDGE, in, “Richard v BBC”- (CLIFF RICHARD suing the BBC for invasion of his privacy) – the JUDGE upheld the claim and ordered that the BBC must pay compensation to CLIFF RICHARD in the sum of, two hundred and ten thousand pounds.

Yet, again, this flouts the ‘criterion’ required for, LAW. The JUDGE, upholding that in this matter, CLIFF RICHARDS was entitled to his PRIVACY.

But, in TRUTH and reality, he was not entitled, to that PRIVACY, in this case.

CLIFF RICHARD had been accused of serious sexual abuse; the police had the ‘duty’ to investigate the allegations; and, all Press and Media also had the ‘duty’ and the ‘responsibility’, to report to all the “People of the Country”, how the police carried out that duty.

The police decided to search CLIFF RICHARD’s home. The BBC, taking pictures from a helicopter, merely filmed, and transmitted, the police carrying out that duty. The, BBC, and all the worlds MEDIA, had the irrefutable right and duty, to do this.

Because, if the Press and MEDIA are restricted from doing this; on the mere ‘whim’ or 'bias' of a JUDGE; no one will ever know, how the police are INVESTIGATING any crime at all.  

Absolute, FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, was required and very necessary here.

GET RID OF THE ROTTEN JUDGES.