ABOLISH THE WHIPS, Letter to David Cameron, Prime Minister

BREXIT was the very 'last straw' for me.
Absolute political chaos, turmoil, and confusion; the '£' falling drastically; yet, both TORY and LABOUR politicians 'fighting with each other' trying to secure more political power and control. Right at this very moment, only one thing should be on their minds, "This country's new direction now that we have 'chosen' to leave the EU." Careful analysis of all of this, now warrants, immediate very drastic remedy. The, POLITICAL PARTY's, and, their present overwhelming domination and control of this nation has got us all into this plight and mess; the overwhelming 'POWER' of the political party's, must now be completely destroyed. WE, "The People", of this nation today, in reality, have no participation, at all. Hence, my letter to the Prime Minister, shown here below:



June 24, 2016

The Rt Hon David Cameron MP

The Prime Minister

10 Downing Street

London SW1A 2AA

 

Dear Prime Minister

 

Firstly, I am not a TORY; I actually loathe and detest everything that TORY, stands for and is.

But, I have to admire you personally, for the very hard fight you put up for the EU ‘REMAIN’ campaign. And, here, although I compliment your splendid effort to fight to defend the campaign; I must also criticise you for cowardly giving in to the ‘anti-European’ right wing of the TORY party; and, trying to placate them; that forced you to announce that there was to be a REFERENDUM, in the first place. If you had not decided that the REFERENDUM was necessary, there would have been no ‘vote to leave’ that took place yesterday at all. You, Sir, are entirely personally responsible for the plight, all the British People, must face now. I therefore, now address this ‘Ultimatum’ to both you and any successor, of the office of Prime Minister.

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard

Status: 89 years of age, retired. Not a Member of any political party.

  

ULTIMATUM

 

1.     On 25.04.2014 parliament passed the “Second Reading of the HS2 Bill”, 451 votes for, and only 50 votes against; all carried out, under the UNLAWFUL influence, of the political party WHIPS.

2.     On the 12.5.16 parliament also passed the, “Housing and Planning Act 2016”, 292 votes for, and 197 votes against, also under the UNLAWFUL influence of the WHIPS; and, therefore and thereby, neither of these two Bills have any true legal validity at all.

3.     On the 13.5.16 Her Majesty the Queen granted the “Royal Assent” to this “Housing and Planning Act 2016”; thereby, granting the ‘assent’ to corrupt law.

A.     The political party WHIPS in parliament in instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those Members by the constituents; this creates the, “Prejudice of the People”.

B.     Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ set out and recorded in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”.

Here is that paragraph in that Bill:

“The Said Rights Claimed”:

“And they do Claime Demand and Insist upon all and singular

The Premises as their undoubted Rights and Liberties and that

noe Declarations Judgements Doeings or Proceedings to the

Prejudice of the People, in any of the said Premises, ought in

any wise to be drawne hereafter, into Consequence or Example”

 

C.     Parliaments, “SUPREMACY”

This is afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the “Bill of Rights 1689”; and this reads as follows:

“That the Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be Impeached or Questioned in any court or place out of Parlyament”.

 

The British Judiciary has ‘conspired to pervert the course of justice’ and to deceive the British people by constantly asserting and ruling that this “Article 9” is, absolute; thereby, denying all or any challenge to parliament, in the courts. But, “Article 9” is not absolute; it is merely, conditional. Being totally reliant upon the conditions as set out in, “The Said Rights Claimed”. (As shown above). Therefore,

D.    The political party WHIPS in parliament has no legality at all.

E.     The illegality of the WHIPS in parliament can be challenged in the courts.

F.      Her Majesty the Queen cannot grant the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law.

 

This, ULTIMATUM, then instructs the Prime Minister (whoever that may be) to immediately ‘abolish’ the UNLAWFUL political party WHIPS in parliament. To remove all traces of the WHIPS, without any delay.

If the Prime Minister, arrogantly ignores this ‘Ultimatum’ and refuses to abolish the WHIPS’, I shall immediately issue a public challenge to ELIZABETH THE SECOND, challenging her ‘legal’ right to occupy the English throne. She has granted the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law repeatedly, more recently, (The “Housing and Planning Act 2016”) and, she has not once honoured the “Original Contract” all of the time she has sat upon the throne.

 

THE HISTORY AND THE PRECEDENT OF LAW DETERMINING THE DUTY OF ALL ‘REIGNING MONARCH’S’ THAT SIT UPON THE ENGLISH THRONE.

The “DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS” departed from this land when ‘Charles the First’ had his head cut off. Thereafter, all “Reigning Monarch’s” only rule by ‘consent’ of the people.

(1), Every reigning Monarch sitting upon the English throne is required to honour and comply with the “Original Contract”

(2), In spite of any ‘conspiracy’ that took place betwixt Monarchy and Parliament in the institution of, “CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY”, (that actually unlawfully removed the ‘people’s protection’ from this contract), this does not relieve the “Reigning Monarch of England” from carrying out that duty. Both Monarchy and Parliament may ‘assume that it does’; but, by ‘precedent of law’ as long as there is a ‘Reigning Monarch’ sitting upon that English throne; they are always obliged to both honour and comply with the, “Original Contract”.

 

(3), The ‘unwritten contract’, existing in English Law, betwixt Monarch and the People”

(4), The CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 removed ‘King James the Second’ from the throne for, “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People”; The, CONVENTION, determined, that thereby he had ‘failed to protect the people’, abdicating the throne. The CONVENTION ruled, that the throne was, Vacant. Prince William of Orange became the next King.

(5), In a huge, “FREE CONFERENCE”, “Debate at Large” held in the ‘Painted Chamber’ of the House of Commons, between 28th January 1688 and 6^th February 1688, held between both “Commons and Lords”, they debated the ‘words’, “Abdicated” and the, “Vacancy of the Throne”. And, at the conclusion of that debate it was resolved that, (a), King James the Second, had failed to honour the “Original Contract”; that, (b), he had abdicated the throne; that, (c) the throne was, VACANT.

 (6), During that debate, it was established as the ‘precedent of law’ that the “Original Contract” although, ‘unwritten’; it did actually exist in English Law. In this “FREE CONFERENCE” debate, HENRI POWLE, the Speaker of the CONVENTION, declared this:

 

“It is from those that are upon the Throne of England (when there are any such) from whom the People of England ought to receive Protection; and to whom, for that Cause, they owe the Allegiance of Subjects; but there being none now from whom they expect Regal Protection, and to whom, for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the Commons conceive, The Throne is Vacant."

 

With, King James II, being removed from the throne and with the throne being declared, VACANT’; the CONVENTION, then turned their attention to the, “Lineal Descent”, (all other Kings or Queens who would occupy the throne), and, they further determined that,

“The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed”.

 

Note: ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not once honoured that “Original Contract” all of the time she has occupied that ‘English’ throne. She has repeatedly ‘franked and rubber-stamped’ Bills and Laws passed by parliament under the UNLAWFUL political party WHIPS; granting the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law.

 

Prime Minister, if the WHIPS are not abolished from Parliament immediately, I shall expose to the British People this sham of a ‘Monarchy’ we endure now.

 

The ‘Reigning Monarch’ of England is provided with two ‘legal instruments’ that have been specifically created and designed to, ‘protect the people’. They are, “The Royal Assent” and “The Royal Prerogative”. The very last time the “Royal Assent” was refused to a Bill that was passed in parliament, was on the 11^th March in the year 1708, when Queen Anne refused to grant it to the Bill for the “Settlement of the Militia in Scotland.”

Ever since that date, every ‘Reigning Monarch’ that has sat upon the ‘English’ has treated all their ‘Subjects’ with sheer contempt.

 

In conclusion: 
I am a FREEBORN citizen of Planet Earth; yet in LAW; in English LAW, I am classified as a "Subject of the Crown". That, is an imposition upon me. Therefore, if I am to endure this 'unlawful' subjugation imposed upon me; I demand the 'protection of each Reigning Monarch; for as long as a Monarch shall reign. "Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord" - "The Original Contract".

Respectfully suggest that you should read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions for you to answer and, I provide the answers, that you need to know. Read and learn how you are being badly and unlawfully governed, and read also how Monarchy holds you in imposed subjugation without your consent. The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

Read also this petition: https://www.change.org/p/the-lord-chief-justice-of-england-and-wales-the-rt-hon-lord-thomas-of-cwmgiedd-petition-to-create-a-true-democracy?recruiter=63876526&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=share_twitter_responsive