June 24, 2016
The Rt Hon David Cameron MP
The Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
Dear Prime Minister
Firstly, I am not a TORY; I actually loathe and detest
everything that TORY, stands for and is.
But, I have to admire you personally, for the very hard fight
you put up for the EU ‘REMAIN’ campaign. And, here, although I compliment your
splendid effort to fight to defend the campaign; I must also criticise you for
cowardly giving in to the ‘anti-European’ right wing of the TORY party; and,
trying to placate them; that forced you to announce that there was to be a REFERENDUM,
in the first place. If you had not decided that the REFERENDUM was necessary,
there would have been no ‘vote to leave’ that took place yesterday at all. You,
Sir, are entirely personally responsible for the plight, all the British People,
must face now. I am sad and disappointed that you have elected to resign. But,
I therefore now address this ‘Ultimatum’ to both you and any successor, of the
office of Prime Minister.
Sincerely
Gordon J Sheppard
Status: 89 years of age,
retired. Not a Member of any political party.
ULTIMATUM
1. On 25.04.2014 parliament passed the
“Second Reading of the HS2 Bill”, 451 votes for, and only 50 votes against; all
carried out, under the UNLAWFUL influence, of the political party WHIPS.
2. On the 12.5.16 parliament also passed
the, “Housing and Planning Act 2016”, 292 votes for, and 197 votes against,
also under the UNLAWFUL influence of the WHIPS; and, therefore and thereby,
neither of these two Bills have any true legal validity at all.
3. On the 13.5.16 Her Majesty the Queen
granted the “Royal Assent” to this “Housing and Planning Act 2016”; thereby,
granting the ‘assent’ to corrupt law.
A. The political party WHIPS in
parliament in instructing ‘elected’ Members of Parliament on how they should or
must vote; overrules and supplants all ‘rightful influence’ placed upon those
Members by the constituents; this creates the, “Prejudice of the People”.
B. Yet, “Prejudice of the People” is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of
law’ set out and recorded in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The
Said Rights Claimed”.
Here is that paragraph in that Bill:
“The
Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and Insist
upon all and singular
The Premises as their undoubted
Rights and Liberties and that
noe Declarations Judgements Doeings
or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any of
the said Premises, ought in
any wise to be drawne hereafter, into
Consequence or Example”
C. Parliaments, “SUPREMACY”
This is afforded to Parliament by “Article 9” of the
“Bill of Rights 1689”; and this reads as follows:
“That the
Freedome of Speech Debates and Proceedings of Parlyament ought not to be
Impeached or Questioned in any court or place out of Parlyament”.
D. The political party WHIPS in parliament has no legality
at all.
E. The illegality of the WHIPS in parliament can be
challenged in the courts.
F. Her Majesty the Queen cannot grant the “Royal Assent”
to corrupt law.
This, ULTIMATUM, then, instructs the Prime Minister
(whoever that may be) to immediately ‘abolish’ the UNLAWFUL political party
WHIPS in parliament. To remove all traces of the WHIPS, without any delay.
If the Prime Minister, arrogantly ignores this ‘Ultimatum’
and refuses to abolish the WHIPS’, I shall immediately issue a public challenge
to ELIZABETH THE SECOND, challenging her ‘legal’ right to occupy the English
throne. She has granted the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law repeatedly, more
recently to the, (The “Housing and Planning Act 2016”); and, she has not once honoured
the “Original Contract” all of the time she has sat upon the throne.
THE HISTORY AND THE PRECEDENT OF LAW DETERMINING THE
DUTY OF ALL ‘REIGNING MONARCH’S’ THAT SIT UPON THE ENGLISH THRONE.
The “DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS” departed from this land 'England'
when ‘Charles the First’ had his head cut off. Thereafter, all “Reigning
Monarch’s” only rule by ‘consent’ of the people.
(1), Every reigning Monarch
sitting upon the English throne is required to honour and comply with the
“Original Contract”
(2), I spite of any ‘conspiracy’
that took place betwixt Monarchy and Parliament in the institution of,
“CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY”, (that actually unlawfully removed the ‘people’s
protection’ from this contract), this does not relieve the “Reigning Monarch of
England” from carrying out that duty. Both Monarchy and Parliament may ‘assume
that it does’; but, by ‘precedent of law’ as long as there is a ‘Reigning
Monarch’ sitting upon that English throne; they are always obliged to both
honour and comply with the, “Original Contract”.
(3), The ‘unwritten contract’,
existing in English Law, betwixt Monarch and the People”
(4), The CONVENTION (Parliament)
of 1688 removed ‘King James the Second’ from the throne for, “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King
and People”; The, CONVENTION, determined, that thereby he had ‘failed to
protect the people’, abdicating the throne. The CONVENTION ruled, that the
throne was, Vacant. Prince William of Orange became the next King.
(5), In a huge, “FREE CONFERENCE”,
“Debate at Large”, held in the ‘Painted
Chamber’ of the House of Commons, between 28th January 1688 and 6th February
1688, held between both “Commons and Lords”, they debated the ‘words’, “Abdicated”
and the, “Vacancy of the Throne”. And, at the conclusion of that debate
it was resolved that, (a), King James
the Second, had failed to honour the “Original Contract”; that, (b), he had
abdicated the throne; that, (c) the throne was, VACANT.
(6), During that debate, it was
established as the ‘precedent of law’ that the “Original Contract” although, ‘unwritten’;
it did actually exist in English Law. In this “FREE CONFERENCE” debate, HENRI
POWLE, the Speaker of the CONVENTION,
declared this:
“It is from those that are upon the Throne of
England (when there are any such) from whom the People of England ought
to receive Protection; and to whom, for that Cause, they owe the
Allegiance of Subjects; but there being none now from whom they expect Regal
Protection, and to whom, for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of
Subjects, the Commons conceive, The Throne is Vacant."
With, King
James II, being removed from the throne and with the throne being declared,
VACANT’; the CONVENTION, then turned their attention to the, “Lineal Descent”,
(all other Kings or Queens who would occupy the throne), and, they further
determined that,
“The Contract is as binding upon the
Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract
they too can be Deposed”.
Note: ELIZABETH THE SECOND has not
once honoured that “Original Contract” all of the time she has occupied that ‘English’
throne. She has repeatedly ‘franked and rubber-stamped’ Bills and Laws passed
by parliament under the UNLAWFUL political party WHIPS; granting the “Royal
Assent” to corrupt law.
The ‘Reigning Monarch’ of England is
provided with two ‘legal instruments’ that have been specifically created and
designed to, ‘protect the people’. They are, “The Royal Assent” and “The Royal
Prerogative”. The very last time the “Royal Assent” was refused to a Bill that
was passed in parliament, was on the 11th March in the year 1708,
when Queen Anne refused to grant it to the Bill for the, “Settlement of the
Militia in Scotland.”
Ever since that date, every ‘Reigning
Monarch’ that has sat upon the ‘English’ has treated all their ‘Subjects’ with
sheer contempt.
Respectfully suggest that you
should read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for
proper participation. I pose fourteen
questions for you to answer and, I provide the answers, that you need to know.
Read and learn how you are being badly and
unlawfully governed, and read also how Monarchy holds you in imposed
subjugation without your consent. The book
is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it
can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
No comments:
Post a Comment