QUEEN’S BIRTHDAY CELEBRATIONS
INDOCTRINATION
- ENTRENCHED DESPOTISM - AND - SHEER MYTH.....
"WE LOVE OUR QUEEN"
More than sixty years on the Throne; yet she has not carried out her 'duty' once.
Our,' WONDERFUL QUEEN'; has never once honoured the "Original Contract" protecting, "Subjects of the Crown", from the tyranny of the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of parliament. Provided, with two 'legal instruments', (The Royal Assent and the Royal Prerogative), that have been purposely designed for the 'protection of the people' - ELIZABETH THE SECOND - has hardly used them at all. In fact, the very last time a 'Reigning Monarch' refused to grant the, 'Royal Assent', to a Bill that had been passed by parliament, was on the '11th day of March 1708". Ever since that date, every 'Reigning Monarch' that has sat upon the 'English' throne; has, "Broken the "Original Contract".
King James the Second was removed from the 'English' throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) in 1688 for,
"Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People";
The, CONVENTION determined that thereby, he had 'abdicated' the throne. The CONVENTION declared that "THE THRONE WAS VACANT"; and, Prince William of Orange became the next King.
The CONVENTION further ruled,
"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed".
'
Elizabeth the Second, therefore, by precedent of, 'LAW', has repeatedly "Broken that Contract"; and, thereby, she has abdicated the throne. There is no 'legality' whatsoever for her still occupying that throne.
"WE LOVE OUR QUEEN"
More than sixty years on the Throne; yet she has not carried out her 'duty' once.
Our,' WONDERFUL QUEEN'; has never once honoured the "Original Contract" protecting, "Subjects of the Crown", from the tyranny of the 'abuses' and the 'prejudice' of parliament. Provided, with two 'legal instruments', (The Royal Assent and the Royal Prerogative), that have been purposely designed for the 'protection of the people' - ELIZABETH THE SECOND - has hardly used them at all. In fact, the very last time a 'Reigning Monarch' refused to grant the, 'Royal Assent', to a Bill that had been passed by parliament, was on the '11th day of March 1708". Ever since that date, every 'Reigning Monarch' that has sat upon the 'English' throne; has, "Broken the "Original Contract".
King James the Second was removed from the 'English' throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) in 1688 for,
"Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People";
The, CONVENTION determined that thereby, he had 'abdicated' the throne. The CONVENTION declared that "THE THRONE WAS VACANT"; and, Prince William of Orange became the next King.
The CONVENTION further ruled,
"The Contract is as binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the Contract they too can be Deposed".
'
Elizabeth the Second, therefore, by precedent of, 'LAW', has repeatedly "Broken that Contract"; and, thereby, she has abdicated the throne. There is no 'legality' whatsoever for her still occupying that throne.
“It is from those that are upon the Throne of England (when there
are any such) from whom the People of England ought to receive
Protection; and to whom, for that Cause, they owe the Allegiance of
Subjects; but there being none now from whom they expect Regal Protection,
and to whom, for that Cause they owe the Allegiance of Subjects, the
Commons conceive, The Throne is Vacant."
Henry Powle, The Speaker of the Convention (Parliament) 1688
"WE LOVE OUR QUEEN"
Sheer indoctrination and myth. And, the wholly corrupt
indoctrination, by the entire British press and media; "the purveyors
of despotism".
Note: THIS IS IMPORTANT; because, WE, The BRITISH people, have no other 'protection of law' at all. Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament; and the entire British Establishment; all look upon 'LAW' as being something that only the 'common people' must obey. In consequence, WE, the people, have no access whatsoever to a, "Written Constitution" or a, "Bill of Rights" or a, "Supreme Court of Law" where we can test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' of parliament; from within law.
We, the British 'common people' do not endure all this travesty in order that the 'Reigning Monarch' shall enjoy all the privileges of 'Monarchy', act as patron to various charities, officially open new premises, buildings and establishments, host garden parties, or travel the 'globe' promoting British goods and British prestige.
We, the 'common people' by, 'precedent of law', must endure this imposed 'subjugation'; but, only if the 'Reigning Monarch' honours and complies with the terms of the "Original Contract', providing the 'protection' of the People.
"Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord"
This is, "The Original Contract"Note: THIS IS IMPORTANT; because, WE, The BRITISH people, have no other 'protection of law' at all. Monarchy, Judiciary, Government and Parliament; and the entire British Establishment; all look upon 'LAW' as being something that only the 'common people' must obey. In consequence, WE, the people, have no access whatsoever to a, "Written Constitution" or a, "Bill of Rights" or a, "Supreme Court of Law" where we can test, question, or challenge the 'abuses' of parliament; from within law.
We, the British 'common people' do not endure all this travesty in order that the 'Reigning Monarch' shall enjoy all the privileges of 'Monarchy', act as patron to various charities, officially open new premises, buildings and establishments, host garden parties, or travel the 'globe' promoting British goods and British prestige.
We, the 'common people' by, 'precedent of law', must endure this imposed 'subjugation'; but, only if the 'Reigning Monarch' honours and complies with the terms of the "Original Contract', providing the 'protection' of the People.
"Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord"
No comments:
Post a Comment