BREXIT: The E.U. TREATY and the “Ultimate Criterion” in order to leave…..

 

In this massive hysteria prevailing throughout Great Britain today in respect of whether THERESA MAY and her (unelected) government should have the sole and exclusive right to 'trigger Article 50' and negotiate all the terms for withdrawal; or, whether PARLIAMENT (Representing, "All the People"), should be involved?

 

Absolutely everyone, the Judiciary, the profession of law, Government, Parliament, and even the National Press, have all completely forgotten or purposely ignored, all about the, 'ultimate criterion', applicable here:

 

WHO, OWNS THE BLOODY TREATY?

WHO, ACTUALLY, OWNS THE, E.U. TREATY?

 

GOVERNMENT DOES NOT OWN THIS TREATY;

THE BRITISH PEOPLE DO.

 

The British people, in another referendum, decided and determined that they wanted to 'Join the E.U.' The government of the day merely 'signed’ the document to join; on behalf of all the people. So, the, E.U. TREATY, is the "PEOPLE's TREATY".

 

Furthermore, at the very instant, that the government of that day ‘signed’ the Treaty; right at that very instant, all the People of Great Britain became "Euro Citizens" and, they were, and are even now, wholly protected by European Law, the European Human Rights Court, and, European Human Rights Law.

 

The British people, by the, BREXIT, referendum, has now voted and determined they want to 'leave' the E.U. But, that vote result only determined the INTENT to leave.

 

IT DID NOT AUTHORISE IN ANY WAY, ANY ACTION REQUIRED AT ALL, IN ORDER, TO LEAVE THE E.U.

 

Nor, in any way, did it remove, abolish, or even demean the existing: British People's E.U. 'protection'; guaranteed, under European, LAW; of both the European Human Rights Court and, European Human Rights  Law.

 

This 'protection' is legally still valid and in force until the very moment Great Britain, actually, ‘LEAVES’, the E.U.

Until then, myself, and everyone in the country, is entitled to demand that the "European Human Rights Court" provides our 'protection' in respect of all the procedures and negotiations that will be necessary; to withdraw from the E.U. And, that, "TREATY."

 

The "European Human Rights Court" must immediately intervene to protect 'BRITISH E.U. CITIZENS' from being abused. This court must immediately rule and declare that the procedure for 'triggering' Article 50 and negotiating the terms of withdrawing from the E.U. must take into account the rightful 'human rights' interests of all the BRITISH E.U. CITIZENS, living today in the U,K. Because, under those 'negotiations' and the possible 'outcome', their legal status will radically change. Whereas, such 'radical change' under, E.U. Current Law, is wholly unlawful; until Great Britain has actually left the E.U.

 

UNTIL GREAT BRITAIN HAS ACTUALLY LEFT THE E.U. THE  BRITISH EURO CITIZENS ARE PROTECTED BY EUROPEAN LAW AS GUARANTEED BY THE E.U. TREATY.

 

Accordingly, the European Human Rights Court must ensure that during the withdrawal 'negotiating' procedures taking place, that "BRITISH EURO CITIZENS" human rights, are protected during those procedures; and, the court must rule that the only way that this can be done; is to order that the 'negotiations' and all of the procedures necessary in order to withdraw from the E.U.; must be controlled through, THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT.

 

This 'protection' cannot be guaranteed if THERESA MAY and her vested interested TORY government has the sole and exclusive right to control these necessary procedures.

 

THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT IN PROTECTING BRITISH EURO 'CITIZENS'; DURING THESE WITHDRAWAL PROCEDURES; MUST ENSURE, THAT ONLY 'PARLIAMENT' IS AUTHORISED TO TRIGGER ARTICLE 50 AND NEGOTIATE THE LEAVING OF THE E.U.

 

All this is most important because the British people have no protection of law whatsoever; there is no access to a 'Written Constitution"; or, a proper, "Bill of Rights; or access to a "Supreme Court" where it is possible to test, question, or challenge the 'abuse' of parliament; in the courts. Furthermore, although there is a 'Reigning Monarch' sitting upon the English throne who is charged by the duty of honouring the "Original Contract"; requiring the protection of the People; ELIZABETH THE SECOND, provides no protection at all.

 

The only protection of LAW that the British people has or had, is the EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT and EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.

For further info in respect of all of the above see this:http://pamphletteer.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/theresa-may-cant-sleep.html

 

THERESA MAY CAN'T SLEEP.......

THERESA MAY asserts that she is being kept awake at nights due to BREXIT and leaving the E.U.

 

Oh how annoying for her; but I express no sympathy for her whatsoever; because, she might be being kept awake at nights over BREXIT; whilst I have bloody "NIGHTMARES" about it; due to the fact that she claims the sole and exclusive right to negotiate the terms for triggering 'Article 50' and the terms for withdrawal from the E.U.

 

BREXIT the actual leaving of the E.U. will affect the lives of everyone in the country; it is going to produce the greatest CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS of this century; and, just as the BREXIT  'Referendum' provided the right for everyone to vote and participate; the actual 'withdrawal' process in order to leave the E.U. must also provide the right of full 'participation' as well.

 

The only way for 'every one in the country' to PARTICIPATE in this; is thru PARLIAMENT.

So, it is PARLIAMENT and not THERESA MAY (and her Tory cronies) who must decide this.

 

Parliament, must set up a "BREXIT WITHDRAWAL RIGHTS COMMITTEE" and Members of that Committee must be drawn from elected Members of Parliament of all the political parties; and, the best and most experienced legal brains in the country well versed and experienced in "Constitutional Law" drawn from the Judiciary and the profession of law.

 

Such "Constitutional PARLIAMENT Committee's" have been set up before; 

The very establishment in law of the, "SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT", was created and determined by such a special committee: The "Rights Committee" of the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688.

 

This, BREXIT, "Constitutional Law" requirements necessary for negotiating the withdrawal from the E.U. is actually far more important - to everyone in the country' - than the "Supremacy of Parliament" itself. Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689, only provides the protection of the 'Supremacy' of Parliament; but, the paragraph "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" within that very same Bill provides the "Protection of the People"; and, this rules, that when Parliament applies its 'Supremacy'; that it does so on the condition; that; nothing, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 

This is the established, Precedent of Law.

 

In consequence of this, if THERESA MAY solely and exclusively acts and determines the withdrawal process for leaving the E.U. and, wholly ignores excludes and flouts the interests of all the British people at large; she will be creating the "Prejudice of the People". Which will immediately, cancel and abolish the legal validity, of both ARTICLE 9", and, the "SUPREMACY"

 

Thus; for the lawful withdrawal from the E.U. Legally, PARLIAMENT MUST BE INVOLVED .

 

READ AND SIGN THIS PETITION: https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

The Rt Hon Jeremy Wright QC MP; The Lord Chancellor ... www.change.org BREXIT PETITION To. The current Lord Chief Justice - The Right Honourable The Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd. The Attorney General - The Rt Hon Jeremy Wright QC MP

 

SANTANDER BANK TRAVESTY

The transfer of money 'bank to bank' overseas.

 

In wanting to transfer a sum of money to my daughter in Australia from my Santander bank account, for her birthday, on contacting the bank I was informed charges would be as follows:

 

1. £25 standard Santander bank fee for transferring money overseas.
2. 20 Australian dollars for the recipient Australian banks fee.
3. Unspecified charges for some unknown 'middle bank'.

 

But, Santander does not know which 'MIDDLE BANK' that is; nor do they know what fee will be charged. Or, if they knew, they would not tell me.

 

Thus, the consumer has no idea what is the total fee he must pay, and, be deducted from his account, at the time he gives the bank instruction, to transfer the money. He can only verify this, AFTER HE HAS TRANSFERRED THE MONEY.

 

This seems to me to be wholly wrong and unlawful.

 

This "MIDDLE BANK" arrangement as described to me here surely cannot be lawful?

 

In effect it is stealing money without consent. I was quite prepared to accept charges A and B; but, (C), is a sheer tyranny worthy of contempt. I was obliged to find an alternative way to transfer the money. And, I eventually used PAYPAL.

 

I registered the complaint with Santander, but they said, "It was the common banking procedure that all banks use".

 

Therefore, this text as above, is the complaint I have now registered with my Member of Parliament.

 Gordon J Sheppard

 

 

 

BREXIT-THE FINAL ANALYSIS...

BREXIT – The Withdrawal Process;

The Final Analysis…

 

LAW, is not interested in speculation and assumption; LAW, is only concerned, with the “Letter of Law”

 

The referendum ballot paper did not declare any ‘action’ to be carried out at all; voting “LEAVE” in that referendum, only determined the INTENT to leave.

 

 

1. David Cameron did not grant the E.U. Referendum; he merely put the proposition to parliament for the referendum; and it was PARLIAMENT that approved it voting for it by 6 to 1.

 

2. The ballot paper for the referendum was so stupid and so negligent that it only provided two options for selection: to, LEAVE; or to, REMAIN.

 

3. The ballot paper provided no options at all for any 'authority' or, for any 'action’ to be carried out'; nor did it specify, as to what should happen, if the declared results of the voting in that referendum determined, to, LEAVE.

 

4. The ballot paper did not 'authorise' actually, LEAVING THE E.U, it merely expressed by the, 'letter of law', the INTENTION to leave.

 

4. In consequence of this gross error, negligence, and stupidity of government, that ballot paper provided no provision whatsoever as to what should happen next.

 

5. In consequence again, THERESA MAY and her Tory government have no right of claim to the sole and exclusive ‘determinations’ of the 'leaving' process.

 

6. This is the greatest grave national constitutional crisis of this century; absolutely everyone is going to be affected by the outcome; Leaving the E.U. Is for ever; once leaving, this cannot be changed. Thus, it is a National matter of grave urgency affecting the whole NATION; it cannot be left exclusively in the hands of THERESA MAY and her ideological TORY objectives.

 

7. All the people of the country are entitled to be involved in determining that 'leaving' process.

 

8. Accordingly, and in consequence of the fact that PARLIAMENT granted the referendum in the first place; PARLIAMENT, and, only PARLIAMENT, must now decide.

 

9. In order that I and the British People are protected by law in this respect; I have now petitioned the "Supreme Court" and "Her Majesty the Queen" for that protection. Here is my petition:

 

     https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

 

SIGN IT, and participate.

 

Read my book "DEMOCRACY"; it is a guide for the British for proper participation. I pose fourteen questions for you to answer and, I provide the answers, that you need to know. Read and learn how you are being badly and unlawfully governed, and read also how Monarchy holds you in imposed subjugation without your consent. The book is available cheaply in two formats: a Kindle e-book and a paperback, and it can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984

 

BREXIT REFERENDUM ALERT...

BREXIT REFERENDUM ALERT– ‘UNLESS YOU WANT’ ?

 

IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO ALL 16,141,241 PEOPLE WHO VOTED REMAIN;

UNLESS YOU WANT, THERESA MAY AND HER CORRUPT GOVERNMENT NEGOTIATING ALL THE TERMS FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE E.U. IN THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE VESTED INTERESTS OF THE TORY PARTY;

THEN YOU MUST SIGN THIS PETITION:

https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-jeremy-wright-qc-mp-the-lord-chancellor-brexit-vote-to-leave-challenging-legality-of-the-leaving-process

 

And, persuade all other’s to sign.

 

BREXIT PETITION

 BREXIT PETITION

 

To.

The current Lord Chief Justice -  The Right Honourable The Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd

 The Attorney General - The Rt Hon Jeremy Wright QC MP

 The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice - The Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP

 Her Majesty the Queen

 

INTRODUCTION:

 

In the aftermath of the British People voting to leave the European Union, the country now faces the greatest,

 

"CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS OF THIS CENTURY"

Placing the country with the sheer prospect of peril if things go wrong from hereon, as a result of this decision.

 

Results of the referendum vote:

 

Vote to remain in E.U. - 16,141,241

Vote to leave the E.U. - 17,410,742

Total votes cast - 33,551,983

 

We, specifically, all among the, 16,141,241 people, who voted REMAIN; and, all among the 33,551,983 people, who voted in total; now append our signatures to this petition, challenging the "SUPREME COURT', (the, Highest Court, in the land), to recognise our concerns and to determine and rule as follows:

 

Concerns:

 

 The question posed on the referendum ballot paper only provided the options to REMAIN or LEAVE the E.U. Voting to LEAVE; only provided the COUNTRY with the intent to LEAVE. It provided no 'mandate' at all for ANYONE to have sole and exclusive right to determine who should "Trigger Article 50" or to negotiate any terms for leaving the E.U.

 

THERESA MAY, the Prime Minister and her government has no 'lawful' right whatsoever to claim the sole and exclusive right to trigger Article 50 and negotiate the terms of withdrawal

 

THIS IS A MATTER OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE - WHERE EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY IS AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME - THE COUNTRY AND ALL LIVING WITHIN IT FACE TERRIBLE PERIL IF WRONG DECISIONS ARE MADE.

 

We, all signing this petition therefore challenge the "SUPREME COURT" to determine and rule,

 

A.   That; THERESA MAY and her government does not have the sole and exclusive right to trigger 'Article 50' and negotiate withdrawal from the E.U.

B.    That; There should be a "BREXIT COMMITTEE" set up, comprising of all shades of political party representation of Parliament, to determine this issue.

C.    That; The 'Committee' must exclude, all Members of Parliament who lied and manipulated the referendum vote, in order to achieve the result, that they desired. The 'Committee' Membership must be the representation of honest people wholly 'unbiased' in arriving at their decisions in respect to this matter.

 

We, all signing this petition; also petition HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, to carry out her duty in protecting 'the people'; "HER SUBJECTS"; as determined and required by the 'precedent of law' set out in the "Original Contract" binding upon all 'Reigning Monarchs' that sit upon the English throne.

 

We, respectfully request, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, to protect us all, in this regard.

 

We, append our signatures here, in good faith.

 

BREXIT and CORRUPTION...

RE. BREXIT REFERENDUM AND THE AFTERMATH…

 

THE BREXIT BALLOT PAPER ONLY PROVIDED ONE QUESTION: 'REMAIN' OR 'LEAVE'.

IT PROVIDED NO PROVISION AT ALL FOR WHAT SHOULD FOLLOW IF THE RESULT OF THE VOTE WAS TO LEAVE. FURTHERMORE, IT PROVIDED NO INSTRUCTION OR PROVISION OF ANY MANDATE AS TO WHO OR WHAT SHOULD NEGOTIATE THE ACTUAL LEAVING OF THE E.U. IF THE DECLARED VOTE WAS TO LEAVE.

THIS THEREFORE, NOW PRESENTS THE, "CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM OF THIS CENTURY". EVERYONE IN THE COUNTRY THEREFORE BEING AFFECTED BY THE OUTCOME. IT IS THERFORE A "NATIONAL PROBLEM"; WHICH ONLY 'LAW' AND THE 'SUPREME COURT' CAN DECIDE.

THERESA MAY, (a un-elected Prime Minister), AND HER GOVT HAS NO EXCLUSIVE MANADATE IN ORDER TO TRIGGER ARTICLE 50 OR NEGOTIATE THE PROCESS OF LEAVING THE E.U. ONLY PARLIAMENT CAN PROPERLY DECIDE THIS.

THE, 14,410,742, PEOPLE WHO VOTED TO REMAIN MUST NOW COLLECTIVELY CHALLENGE THE 'SUPREME COURT', TO DECIDE.

 

The 'Supreme Court' should firstly determine,

(A), that the referendum ballot paper provided no information or any option for the actual process of leaving the E.U. if, the voting determined, the option to leave;

(B), to rule on the actual 'legality' as to THERESA MAY and the governments intentions now.

In the event that the 'Supreme Court' determines and rules on the 'illegality' of the governments present intent in respect of this; then, the 'Supreme Court' must then order, that an 'all political party' representation, OF PARLIAMENT, should be set up to form a "Constitutional Committee" in order to determine how Article 50 and the procedure to leave the E.U., should take place.

 

But, excluded from any and all participation on that Committee; must be the very ardent pro-BREXIT 'Members of Parliament' who during the referendum; campaigned and 'lied' repeatedly; to CORRUPTLY, influence that vote.

Thereby excluding, the likes of, DAVID DAVIS, BORIS JOHNSON, MICHAEL GOVE, and, many others, from serving on this Committee. If the Committee is to be formed there must be no corrupt bias of the 'liars' that manipulated the referendum.