BREXIT - A WARNING TO PRIME MINISTER, THERESA MAY

WARNING TO GOVERNMENT

 

I WARN THERESA MAY AND ALL THE RIGHT-WING FASCISTS OF HER GOVERNMENT THAT IF THEY "TRIGGER ARTICLE 50", BY PARLIAMENT VOTING CONSENT, AND, BY HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN GRANTING THE "ROYAL ASSENT"; THEN I SHALL CHALLENGE, IN LAW, AND, BY PRECEDENT OF LAW; ELIZABETH THE SECONDS LEGAL RIGHT TO SIT UPON THE THRONE.

 

BY PRECEDENT OF LAW EVERY 'REIGNING MONARCH" OCCUPYING THE BRITISH THRONE, IS BOUND IN DUTY, TO HONOUR THE "ORIGINAL CONTRACT" REQUIRING THE "PROTECTION" OF THE PEOPLE - (SUBJECTS OF THE. CROWN) - IN, CONSEQUENCE, ELIZABETH THE SECOND, MAY NOT GRANT THE "ROYAL ASSENT" TO CORRUPT LAW.

 

ALL ACTS, MOTIONS, AND BILLS, CREATED AND PASSED BY PARLIAMENT UNDER THE UNLAWFUL INFLUENCE OF THE POLITICAL PARTY WHIPS, IS CORRUPT LAW.

 

THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT FLOUT AND BREACH THE "STATUTE IN FORCE/BILL OF RIGHTS 1689/THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" 

 

THE WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT INSTRUCT ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ON HOW THEY SHOULD OR MUST VOTE; THIS OVERRULES AND SUPPLANTS ALL 'RIGHTFUL INFLUENCE' WHICH MIGHT HAVE BEEN PLACED UPON THOSE MEMBERS BY THE CONSTITUENTS; WHO ELECTED THOSE MEMBERS IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS, THEREBY CREATES THE, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".

 

THIS IS WHOLLY PROSCRIBED BY "THE SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" WHICH SPECIFICALLY INSTRUCTS PARLIAMENT, THAT IN PARLIAMENT ENACTING, ANY OF THE "PREMISES" OF THE "BILL OF RIGHTS 1689", THAT NOTHING, "OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".

 

BE WARNED, PRIME MINISTER, THERESA MAY; THAT IF HER MAJESTY "GRANTS THE ROYAL ASSENT" TO THIS 'CORRUPT' E.U. LEAVING BILL, THEN I SHALL CHALLENGE,

ELIZABETH THE SECOND's LEGAL RIGHT, TO CONTINUE, TO SIT UPON THE THRONE.

 

I am sick and tired of living in this wholly "Totalitarian Regime" where I have no "PROTECTION OF LAW" whatsoever.

 

"ALLEGIANCE IS GIVEN TO THE LIEGE LORD FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE LIEGE LORD"

 

MY 'SUBJUGATION' TO THE BRITISH CROWN; IS WHOLLY DEPENDENT UPON, THE 'PROTECTION' OF THE CROWN. WITHOUT THAT 'PROTECTION' THERE IS NO LAWFUL VALIDITY FOR THE 'SUBJUGATION' AT ALL.

FANTASY or REALITY
In the event that today the 'granting' of the "Royal Assent" has become merely an admin procedure of the despotism that prevails; upholding the Monarchy, but, to its own vested interests; and, the "Reigning Monarch" is not actually involved. Then, in such case, there is no need, nor is there any legality, for a "Monarchy" at all.
Because, the only true legality for a Monarch to sit upon the 'English' throne; is that they honour the "Original Contract" and protect the People. The only way the Monarch can protect the People; is by 'granting' or 'refusing to grant'; the, "ROYAL ASSENT.
 

 

Gordon J Sheppard