JUSTICE: BLACKMAN – V – EMILE SCHULTZ ?
Email message sent to RICHARD DRAX MP
Re. HIGH COURT, revision of the sentence, and, the
charge of ‘MURDER’ of Marine, ALEXANDER BLACKMAN.
With respect,
Today I witnessed all the wild gleeful hysteria taking place
outside the High Courts in London after the decision to reduce the sentence
passed on Alexander Blackman was announced. Corruptly and entirely due to the
'manipulation' of 'LAW'; his charge has been reduced from MURDER to only, MANSLAUGHTER; and, his sentence has now been reduced to only
seven years. Which means that he will be released in a matter of weeks.
Yet, BLACKMAN killed; and, he
intended to kill.
It is only 'hindsight' and a rotten and corrupt JUDICIARY, that invents
the excuse of 'diminished responsibility' in order to produce this 'expedient'
ruling.
Intimidated, by the DAILY MAIL and, its
rotten corrupt "FREE BLACKMAN" campaign; and, the
MONEY and the influence of FREDERICK FORSYTHE; plus, all the public
response that this created; the Court had no alternative but to comply
favourably; and, manipulate 'LAW'; with this expedient ruling.
If all of this is to have any integrity and credibility, for
this ruling; then, I, DEMAND, that the case of Gestapo Officer, EMILE SCHULTZ; must
be afforded the very same treatment. There, was no one, at his trial, to
even plead, "diminished responsibility", on his behalf;
WHOLLY, CORRUPTLY AND UNJUSTLY, HE WAS HANGED.
ALL THE PUBLIC SYMPATHY TODAY REFLECTED THE PLIGHT OF 'CLAIRE BLACKMAN'
(BLACKMAN'S WIFE).
BUT, WHAT ABOUT THE PLIGHT OF THE WIFE AND THE TWO LOVELY
DAUGHTERS OF EMILE SCHULTZ?
WHO AT THE 'DAILY MAIL' CARES A DAMN ABOUT THEM?
WHO IN GOVERNMENT, PARLIAMENT, OR, JUDICIARY, CARES A DAMN ABOUT
THEM?
AND, CANNOT, FREDERICK FORSYTH, NOT SMELL THE "STENCH OF
INJUSTICE", HERE?
MY DEMANDS,
I, DEMAND, the most extensive review of the entire case of EMILE
SCHULTZ, and his entire trial.
I, DEMAND, that all the surviving members of his family
are traced. And,
I, DEMAND, that they be awarded massive financial
'compensation'; for the unlawful execution of EMILE SCHULTZ; and, all the pain
that they endured.
In true and just law, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO BE FOUND 'GUILTY' OF
THE CRIME OF MURDER, if there is, NO INTENT TO KILL.
ALEXANDER BLACKMAN INTENDED TO KILL.
EMILE SCHULTZ DID NOT.
EMILE SCHULTZ, UNDER THE THREAT TO HIS OWN LIFE; (BY BEING COURT
MARTIALLED AND SHOT); AND, BY THE SEVERE THREAT TO HIS FAMILY AS
WELL; WAS ORDERED TO KILL. HE HAD NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO OBEY.
HIS MILITARY "OATH", AND, THE LAW OF THE
"FUHRERPRINZIP", COMMANDED HIS OBEDIENCE TO ALL ORDERS ISSUED, BY A
SUPERIOR OFFICER.
Sir, with respect; I now expect you to take up this issue with the same
'fervour' you displayed on behalf of ALEXANDER BLACKMAN.
I therefore expect you to pursue this injustice; unless, you determine,
that, only the 'British' are entitled to the protection of law.
Here below is both the URL
link to my blog, setting out the details of this case; and, the full text of this blog.
Sincerely
Gordon J Sheppard
Status: 90 years of age, retired. Not a member of any political party.
FULL TEXT:
MARINE ALEXANDER BLACKMAN - "JUSTICE"? or "INJUSTICE"?
JUSTICE? or INJUSTICE? in the two
cases listed below.
FACT: MARINE BLACKMAN SHOT AND KILLED AN AFGHAN TALIBAN
FIGHTER. AND THE MOMENT HE 'PULLED THE TRIGGER' HE INTENDED TO KILL.
In comparison:
FACT: Gestapo Officer, EMILE SCHULTZ,
was ordered by his commanding officer to accompany him, and, provide an escort,
whilst transporting two prisoners to an unkown and unamed destination. Shortly
afterwards, on that journey, his commanding officer ordered them all out of the
car, they were then ordered to 'relieve' themselves and 'stretch their
legs' in preparation for the long drive ahead. A few minutes later whilst
these two prisoners were doing this, this commanding officer shot them both in
the back. One of the prisoners died immediately; but, the other one was stil
alive, he was seriously injured and was just lying 'severely injured and
in pain' on the ground. This commanding officer then ordered EMILE SCHULTZ to
shoot and kill this prisoner. EMILE SCHULTZ HAD NO INTENTION TO KILL. But
his commanding officer, then threatened SCHULTZ, by informing him, that
the 'order to kill' had been ordered by ADOLF HITLER himself, that, he had
ordered, that all 'escaping prisoners of war' should be shot. The commanding
officer then ordered SHULTZ to kill this prisoner again; but, this time,
he warned SCHULTZ, that if he disobeyed the order yet again; a
supreme 'direct order' of the Fuhrer himself; that he would then be
court-martialled and shot; and, that his family would be severely pubished as
well. Under this direct order of his commanding officer and under this threat
to his own life, and, his family, if he disobeyed; EMILE SCHULTZ reluctantly,
'pulled the trigger' killing this prisoner. At his trial, it was fully
substantiated that EMILE SCHULTZ had never even known that these two prisoners
were, "PRISONERS OF WAR".
Yet, in sheer vicious spite, he
was found 'Guilty', and, he was HANGED.
FREDERICK FORSYTHE says the reason he
took up the case of MARINE BLACKMAN was because he, 'could smell' the injustice
in that case.
Let him now, 'Smell the Stench of
Injustice', in the case of, EMILE SCHULTZ.
I challenge FREDERICK FORSYTHE to use
all his influence, and, all his money, in order to secure, JUSTICE, here.
I WANT THE SURVIVING FAMILY OF EMILE
SCHULTZ TRACED; I WANT THEM TO SUE THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT FOR THE WRONGFUL
EXECUTION OF EMILE SCHULTZ.
I WANT THEM TO BE FULLY COMPENSATED FOR
THE TERRIBLE INJUSTICE THEY WERE FORCED TO ENDURE.
ACCORDING TO 'LAW', YOU CANNOT BE FOUND GUILTY OF MURDER, IF THERE WAS NO INTENTION TO KILL.
EMILE SCHULTZ HAD NO 'INTENTION TO
KILL' WHATSOEVER. BY, HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER, HE WAS ORDERED TO KILL.
No comments:
Post a Comment