TOO EXTREME...

My blog was “too extreme”….

In posting on my blog, “Pamphlet_teer”, the comments,

A. That, Members of Parliament, were “Fascist”.

B.  That, Government was, “Totalitarian”

C.  That, Her Majesty the Queen failed to protect her ‘Subjects’ by granting the “Royal Assent” to corrupt law.

I, was criticized by someone, who I very much admire, who informed me that I was,

1.  Being, too extreme.

2.  That, the Queen now has nothing to do with the “Royal Assent”. Asserting, that today, this is merely ‘granted’ by the despotic administration overruling, supplanting, and masquerading, as the Monarchy itself. The, “Royal Assent” becoming a  mere formality, where the Queen is not involved at all.

 

So, let me try to justify, the words that I used:

 

 

 

FASCIST

When democratically elected Members of Parliament are elected to faithfully represent the views, opinions, and concerns of those that elected them; they are entitled to expect that those ‘representatives’, when in Parliament, will actually faithfully, REPRESENT. They do not expect that those ‘democratically’ elected representatives will then immediately cast aside their ‘duty’ to their constituents; and, give all their loyalty and allegiance, to their political party. And, comply, with the ‘diktat’, of the political party WHIPS.  When elected Members of Parliament do this; they are not ‘democratic’ at all; they are merely, FASCIST. They are agreeing to an unlawful procedure in parliament, the very same procedure, as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS used, to create their own laws. If they are not democratic, and, willingly submit to this procedure, to create and pass law in parliament; without the participation’ of, “The People”; then what else can you call them but, FASCIST?

 

TOTALITARIAN

Any Government, and ‘governing’ that is not one hundred per cent ‘democratic’; but, adopts the procedure of ‘imposition’ to force Members of Parliament to vote per its own political agenda; and, create and pass laws in parliament, in precisely the same way, as ADOLF HITLER did. It is not, DEMOCRATIC. It is wholly, TOTALITARIAN.

 

THE, “ROYAL ASSENT”

By, ‘precedent of law’, each “Reigning Monarch” sitting upon the English throne is required to honour the “Original Contract”, requiring, as their duty, to protect the People (Subjects of the Crown). They, are required by law, to act as “Head of Government” and, to “Monitor Parliament”, to check and verify that the ‘laws’ created by parliament, are, without corruption;

That, they are in the interests of the country and its people. In, this ‘role and duty’ to protect “Subjects of the Crown”; the “Reigning Monarch”, has the ultimate authority for what becomes, LAW. It is their duty; they may grant the “Royal Assent” to honest law created by parliament. But, where such laws are evidently dishonestly created; in the interests of the protection of the people; they can refuse to grant it, as well.  

The “Royal Assent” and its use, is the ‘right and duty’ of every “Reigning Monarch” that sits upon the English throne. It is their ‘legal instrument’, specifically designed and provided, to protect the People.

The Reigning Monarch cannot allow anyone or anything to ‘masquerade’ as Monarchy; supplanting their authority; in granting the “Royal Assent”. It is the ‘right and duty’ of the Monarch alone.

Where, the MONARCH, allows the ‘despotic administration’ to supplant their role of duty; and permits anyone else to administer the granting of the “Royal Assent”; this will provide the stark vivid evidence; that the British Monarchy is mere ‘myth’ and has no true value at all.

If today, the “Reigning Monarch” no longer grants the “Royal Assent”; then there is no, ‘protection of the people’; and, there is no value, nor, any ‘legal’ validity, for a Monarchy, at all.

 

Gordon J Sheppard