My letter to HM Queen telling her to go..

March 16, 2017

 

Her Majesty the Queen

Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA

 

Madam

 

The, DESPOTISM, surrounding the Monarchy today, is disgraceful.

Telephoning the number 02079304832 on three occasions today treated me with absolute contempt. The ‘operator’ refused to connect me with any responsible authority; repeatedly referring me to and phoning the number for the ‘information’ office; but, although she rang that number three times, no one answered the call. The sheer waste of my ‘valuable’ time.,

 

I remind your Majesty, that legally, I am an ‘imposed’ Subject of the Crown; and, per ‘precedent’ of English Law, I am entitled to the ‘protection’ of the Crown.

 

Madam,

 

I am entitled to the protection of the ‘Reigning Monarch’ of

 

England. Who, is obliged by ‘LAW’, to honor and comply with,

 

the, “ORIGINAL CONTRACT”; providing, the protection of the

 

People.

 

“Allegiance is given to the Liege Lord for the protection of the Liege Lord”

 

For, no other reason, does a ‘Reigning Monarch’ sit upon the British throne. Precedent of ‘LAW’ establishes that when the ‘Reigning Monarch’ ‘fails to provide that protection’; they automatically, abdicate the throne.

KING JAMES II was removed from the throne by the CONVENTION (Parliament) of 1688 for, “Breaking the Original Contract Betwixt King and People”.

 

 

Madam

 

You have repeatedly failed to honor that ‘Contract’ throughout all the years you have occupied that throne. You have repeatedly been ‘responsible’ for granting the “ROYAL ASSENT” to, CORRUPT LAW.

 

All, ‘Acts’ ‘Motions’ and ‘Bills’ created and passed by parliament ‘under the influence’ of the political party WHIPS, is wholly unlawful and corrupt; because, the WHIPS in parliament instruct elected Members of Parliament on how they should or must vote; thereby creating, the, “Prejudice of the People”.

 

PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE is wholly proscribed by the ‘precedent of law’ as set out in the, “Statute in Force/Bill of Rights 1689/The Said Rights Claimed”. This paragraph of that Bill, is the ‘Supreme’ authority of the “Bill of Rights 1689”; for it states within its text, that it is the commanding authority over all the “PREMISES” of the Bill.

 

This paragraph, “The Said Rights Claimed” specifically instructs parliament that, parliament may ‘enact’ its “Supremacy”, (afforded by “Article 9” of that Bill), or, it may ‘enact’ any of the “PREMISES’ of the Bill, providing that nothing, “OUGHT PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE”.

 

The WHIPS in parliament do ‘prejudice the people’; therefore, all legislation passed in parliament under the influence of the WHIPS; is, CORRUPT LAW. For, the WHIPS in parliament; has no legality at all.

 

 Madam

 

YOU have been directly responsible for the granting of the “ROYAL ASSENT” to corrupt ‘LAW’. Thereby, repeatedly, YOU have abdicated the throne.

 

 

Today, this, “ROYAL ASSENT” is being granted, “IN YOUR NAME” to the most important piece of legislation, of my lifetime; the Bill, authorizing government, and, Great Britain, to leave the ‘European Community’. This Bill was created and passed by parliament ‘under the influence’ of the WHIPS. The people of this country being denied all participation; and, thereby, it is corrupt, LAW.

 

MADAM

 

I hereby challenge your legal right to continue ‘sitting’ on the throne.

 

YOU have failed to honor the “ORIGINAL CONTRACT’.

YOU have failed to protect all ‘Subjects’ of the Crown.

YOU have repeatedly granted the ROYAL ASSENT to corrupt law.

YOU have failed to carry out your DUTY.

YOU have abdicated the throne.

 

The ‘Throne’ is as VACANT today, as it was, when KING JAMES II was removed from it. When, the CONVENTION established, the legal existence and validity of the “Original Contract” to be entrenched in LAW; and, when the CONVENTION determined, that in the words of the “Earl of Clarendon” that,

“The contract is a binding upon the Successor as well as it was on the Deposed if the Successor breaks the contract he too may be Deposed."

Go Madam, Go, YOU serve no purpose here. YOU, have not only failed in your DUTY; YOU, have fully established, once and for all, that when the ‘Reigning Monarch’ fails to provide the protection of the People; there is no need; nor, any legal validity; for a MONARCHY at all.

 

Sincerely

Gordon J Sheppard