EMAIL MESSAGE SENT TO
ALL MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT.
To all Members
of Government as shown above,
With respect, and,
FOR YOUR INFORMATION: The Political Party WHIPS in Parliament has no legality at all.
Legislation, Acts, Motions, and, Bills, created and
passed by parliament under the
influence of the political party WHIPS, has no legality whatsoever; and, therefore, they are, CORRUPT LAW.
Today, in this so-called 'democratic' parliament;
Acts, Motions and Bills are being created and passed in precisely the same
manner as ADOLF HITLER and the NAZIS created their own LAW. HITLER, though, had
the perfect 'legality' for doing this; for on the 23rd March 1933, Hitler
presented his "Enabling Act" to the German Democratic 'Reichstag'
(the German parliament) for its approval; and, they had passed that 'Act' 441
votes to 94.
This was the very moment the German "Third Reich" was born, with all its terrible consequences. All the horrors of NAZI GERMANY were carried out under due process of 'LAW'. The, entire 'profession of law' and, all the German people, completely abandoned the, "Rule of Law". That is why I am so terrified that this is now taking place, little by little, in my country today.
This was the very moment the German "Third Reich" was born, with all its terrible consequences. All the horrors of NAZI GERMANY were carried out under due process of 'LAW'. The, entire 'profession of law' and, all the German people, completely abandoned the, "Rule of Law". That is why I am so terrified that this is now taking place, little by little, in my country today.
The British Government and Parliament, has no such
'legality' at all; for their "Enabling Act"; "The political party WHIPS in
Parliament"; that, instruct elected Members of Parliament as to how
they must vote. This, has no legality
at all.
The political party WHIPS, in doing this; overrule
and supplant all the 'rightful influence' that might have been placed upon those
Members, by the Constituents.
This creates the, "PREJUDICE OF THE
PEOPLE"
"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE" is wholly
proscribed by the, 'precedent of law', set out in the, "Statute in Force/Bill of Rights
1689/The Said Rights Claimed".
This paragraph, "The Said Rights
Claimed", set out within the "Bill of Rights 1689", specifically
instructs parliament, that parliament may 'enact' its "SUPREMACY"
afforded by "Article 9" of that Bill; or, it may 'enact' any of the
other "PREMISES" of the Bill; but, only, by complying with the
conditions, set out in the paragraph "The Said Rights Claimed". Which,
instructs parliament, that when parliament 'enacts' any of the "PREMISES"
of the Bill; that nothing, "OUGHT
PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE".
The political party
WHIPS in parliament do, "PREJUDICE THE PEOPLE", therefore the WHIPS
in parliament is wholly unlawful. And, their political party activities, has no
legality at all.
Here is that
paragraph set out in the "Bill of Rights 1689",
“The Said Rights Claimed”:
“And they do Claime Demand and
Insist upon all and singular
The Premises as their undoubted
Rights and Liberties and that
noe Declarations Judgements
Doeings or Proceedings to the
Prejudice of the People, in any
of the said Premises, ought in
any wise to be drawne
hereafter, into Consequence or Example”
This, paragraph of the "Bill of Rights 1689", is the,
'Supreme Authority', of the entire Bill; for it states within its text, that it has the
"authority", over all the "PREMISES" of the Bill.
I, therefore assert, here and now, that the entire
British Judiciary, "Conspires to Pervert the Course of Justice". By,
their ruling:
A. That, "Parliament may not be questioned or be challenged in the Courts under any circumstances."
B. That, "Article 9', is, ABSOLUTE."
C. That, therefore by, 'LAW', this prevents any challenge.
A. That, "Parliament may not be questioned or be challenged in the Courts under any circumstances."
B. That, "Article 9', is, ABSOLUTE."
C. That, therefore by, 'LAW', this prevents any challenge.
This is sheer 'outright deceit' because, according to the
correct interpretation of that Bill', absolutely anyone has the right to test,
question, or challenge parliament in the courts; whenever parliament causes
the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE". "Article 9" is not ABSOLUTE, at all. It
is wholly dependent upon the 'conditions' set out in the paragraph, "The
Said Rights Claimed".
THE POLITICAL PARTY
WHIPS IN PARLIAMENT THEREFORE HAS NO LEGALITY AT ALL.
THE 'WHIPS' IN
PARLIAMENT, MUST BE ABOLISHED.
NOTE: As, the,
"SAID RIGHTS CLAIMED" provides the 'protection of the people'; this,
'LAW' therefore, becomes, "Written in Stone". Because, any attempt at amendment or abolishing the Bill, would result, in that 'protection of the people' being removed.
Parliament, therefore
and, thereby, can never ever amend or abolish the "Bill of Rights
1689", without causing the, "PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
Past or
present' parliaments, can never ever even present a Bill, for the approval, of
the WHIPS political party activity in parliament; without causing the,
"PREJUDICE OF THE PEOPLE".
THE, "SAID
RIGHTS CLAIMED", IS TRULY, "WRITTEN IN STONE".
CONCLUSION
Nothing now should
prevent any rightful challenge to the WHIPS, in any court of law.
The WHIPS flout and
breach the privilege of, "Article 9";
The corrupt and
rotten JUDICIARY, are now obliged to hear the case.
With respect, I suggest that all Government should
read my book "DEMOCRACY" - It is available very cheaply both as a
Kindle e-book for downloading or as a paperback. It can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1500465984
Sincerely
Gordon J Sheppard
Status: 90 years of age, retired. Not a member of
any political party.
No comments:
Post a Comment